Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Nefarious Banana said:

CdnFox / ExFlyer . . . any chance you two can 'kiss and make up/out?

Asking for a friend . . .

Well your friend can pay for my therapy to get that image out of my mind now :) 

I'm not actually fighting :P  I just reply to his weird little cries for help. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

I have actually offered that I would stop many times. I said if he quits, so will I but ,as you can see, confoux seems to relish in being an a$$hole and embarrassed so, I keep feeding him.

He is this way with everyone so... cannot expect him to cold turkey into a reasonable person LOL

LOL no you haven't - go back in this thread and show me where you said that' :) 

And you can stop anytime, you don't need my permission to do that. 

And all i do is point and laugh when you make a joke of yourself. Stop making a joke of yourself and problem solved :)  But your dumb isn't my fault :)  

Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOL no you haven't - go back in this thread and show me where you said that' :) 

And you can stop anytime, you don't need my permission to do that. 

And all i do is point and laugh when you make a joke of yourself. Stop making a joke of yourself and problem solved :)  But your dumb isn't my fault :)  

You stop I stop, as i have asked before a number of times. Read the pasts instead of looking at the pictures LOL

Oh and asking for someone to pay for your therapy is a scream for help for sure LOL LOL LOL

So, again, here is the offer you stop and I will stop.

image.jpeg.c850834a85184d47a9a3d794f3a5d0b4.jpeg

image.jpeg.57ef7ed742e2b4f4db10ffea74d162c7.jpeg

 

Edited by ExFlyer

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said:

"Mi Dad's tougher than your Dad."

"no, he's not."

"yes, he is."

"no, he's not."

etc.

etc. 

etc.

 

Yup...

Fun Eh??

Edited by ExFlyer
  • Downvote 1

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
10 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Fine. Stop. 

Done.

Tout Est Fini

  • Downvote 1

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted

 

7 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said:

"Mi Dad's tougher than your Dad."

"no, he's not."

"yes, he is."

"no, he's not."

etc.

etc. 

etc.

 

 

Well ... more like 

Mi dad....

Ok.

Yes he is

Fine. - really weird you keep going on about it...

I"m telling you he is!

Ok

 LOL - i just like making him react. I know - it's a little silly but it takes no effort and his replies are always amusing ;) It's like playing with the cat with a laser pointer :) 

Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

 

 

Well ... more like 

Mi dad....

Ok.

Yes he is

Fine. - really weird you keep going on about it...

I"m telling you he is!

Ok

 LOL - i just like making him react. I know - it's a little silly but it takes no effort and his replies are always amusing ;) It's like playing with the cat with a laser pointer :) 

Cannot stop eh???

I gave my word but it seems you cannot keep yours.

Now everyone can see what a pr ick you really are.

Edited by ExFlyer
  • Downvote 1

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

Cannot stop eh???

Wasn't responding to you, Looks like you're the one who's having trouble in that department. 

Quote

I gave my word but it seems you cannot keep yours.

You literally just broke it.  You're now quoting me talking to someone else in response to one of their comments - a comment you yourself replied to  -- and pretending i was continuing our conversation?

Nope. You broke your word. big surprise. 

So the pr ick here would be you. But people saw that a long time ago. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said:

"What we have here is failure to communicate" . . . .  often mistaken for "boring and childish"

I don't think we do.  I think he's just struggling to let it go.  Blaming  a reply to  you for his continuing isn't a real thing. 

I'll confess that it's a little childish - like i said, making the cat dance to the laser pointer is kind of a childish pleasure. But honestly this probably goes on no matter what i do. He's like this every single time. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Wasn't responding to you, Looks like you're the one who's having trouble in that department. 

You literally just broke it.  You're now quoting me talking to someone else in response to one of their comments - a comment you yourself replied to  -- and pretending i was continuing our conversation?

Nope. You broke your word. big surprise. 

So the pr ick here would be you. But people saw that a long time ago. 

 

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I don't think we do.  I think he's just struggling to let it go.  Blaming  a reply to  you for his continuing isn't a real thing. 

I'll confess that it's a little childish - like i said, making the cat dance to the laser pointer is kind of a childish pleasure. But honestly this probably goes on no matter what i do. He's like this every single time. 

When you speak about me, you broke your word, regardless who you are speaking with.

As well know now you and your word are shit,

 

image.jpeg.16621fea5ebb14f5ec522cf15e5e2843.jpeg

  • Downvote 1

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I never promised not to speak about you at all. 

Liar. 

Yup, expected that from a piece of shit. It is easy to talk behind someone sback and pretend it is not continuing. LOL

And everyone now knows you are a.....

image.jpeg.2594cc4ed2a814b2256eadade0d9050c.jpeg

with no honour.

Edited by ExFlyer
  • Downvote 1

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

Yup, expected that from a piece of shit. . It is easy to talk behind someone sback and pretend it is not continuing.

It was not behind your back and you replied to him as well :) 

So was it doing it behind my back when you did it?

Kid - don't blame me for you breaking your own word. I stopped replying to you and that should have been more than enough. 

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

It was not behind your back and you replied to him as well :) 

So was it doing it behind my back when you did it?

Kid - don't blame me for you breaking your own word. I stopped replying to you and that should have been more than enough. 

So, to avoid speaking to me, you speak about me??

No honour, a man that cannot keep his word is the worst kind on man.

Edited by ExFlyer
  • Downvote 1

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

So, to avoid speaking to me, you speak about me??

No honour, a man that cannot keep his word is the worst kind on man.

Just another example of muppet-logic, from the biggest no-life this forum has ever seen.  

image.png.275c579a6d810588f6c39111ac83c3c0.png

image.thumb.png.b22971a399fce66ebd65681b89e41cbf.png

Edited by Moonbox
  • Haha 1

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

So, to avoid speaking to me, you speak about me??

 

No, i just stopped speaking to you. That's it.  That seemed to be what you wanted, you needed my permission for some reason to stop your weird childish posts. So fine.  but that doesn't mean i'm going to stop discussing you at all if someone else posts something to me about you -  something that YOU YOURSELF replied to. 

Look kid -you don't need my permission.  If you think this is some sort of weird game then you're playing it by yourself. There isn't  a 'cease fire', there isn't some sort of bizarre peace agreement.  You said you wanted to stop doing the weird little 'angry kindergartener' post and you wanted me to stop replying to them  so i said fine, whatever you need. That's it. 

Did you think i'd never reply to you again anywhere? or someone else if they brought you up? Are you in preschool?

Do what you want kid. I'll reply to whatever i like. I find your childishness mildly amusing so it's really no skin off my bones what you do. I get that you're very disruptive to threads so out of respect for others i gave you what you said you needed to stop your sillyness but somehow that's not enough now and there's some ineffible set of rules somewhere that only you know that you're playing by. 

Do what you like, You claim to be a grown ass man, which is looking more doubtful by the minute. So if you don't like what other people are saying just ignore it and move on. You don't need my permission and i have NO way of knowing what insane twisted rules you've got in that pre-pubescent brain of yours so it's not likely i'm gong to be able to follow them. Is it. 

  • Downvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Moonbox said:

Just another example of muppet-logic, from the biggest no-life this forum has ever seen.  

image.png.275c579a6d810588f6c39111ac83c3c0.png

image.thumb.png.b22971a399fce66ebd65681b89e41cbf.png

Ohhh yeaahhh - i forgot you wound up looking stupid in one of our discussions recently and would be following me around butthurt :)    

Never change moonpie  :)  Stay classy :) 

Posted
1 minute ago, impartialobserver said:

If I was in control of the US senate and house of representatives.. I would impose term limits. 2 terms in the Senate and 4 for the House. Career politicians do not get better with age. Job experience does not help them. They get worse with age. 

all you'd be doing is leaving the entire control of the gov't in the hands of the bureaucrats and what some more dramatic people call the 'deep state' 

You've probably never seen the british tv series "yes minister" which was followed by "yes prime minister", but it's a fantastic glimpse into that world in a comedy setting - and actually true to life enough that the show was almost banned becasue it was seen as disrespectful to the gov't. It's one thing to mock the gov't, or satire the gov't, or parody it but you're not supposed to actually point out it's real flaws :)

But at the end of the day you see very clearly that until they get experienced newer politicians are very easy to lead around by the nose by the public servants and beurocracy who control information and advise them.  

What you want is a career politician who is afraid of the public and recognizes that doing the right thing is to their advantage.  And to get that you need a public willing to punish harshly those who step out of line eithically, vote out those who fail to deliver real results and who are clear in what they want and what the gov't should be trying to achieve. 

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Ohhh yeaahhh - i forgot you wound up looking stupid in one of our discussions recently and would be following me around butthurt :)   

Is this what you're talking about?

image.thumb.png.8c7d0d68334efd51bbaed012d91de9dd.png

You're a treasure trove of truly retarded statements.

🤣

  • Haha 1

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
7 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Is this what you're talking about?

image.thumb.png.8c7d0d68334efd51bbaed012d91de9dd.png

You're a treasure trove of truly retarded statements.

🤣

Oh you mean where i made a typo and you decided that was sufficent grounds to declare victory?

LOL - well now that you mention it, it DOES make you look pretty damn stupid to try to be proud over THAT!! LOLOL

Holy shit you even took the time to take a screen shot of my typo to admire it later :)   Yeah, that doesn't make you look desperate and obsessed at all. :)  Is there  a little room where you post all of those up in a little shrine with candles and all?

Wasn't that the thread where you tried to claim that a term in office wasn't between 4 and 5 years and claimed the elections act didn't exist?

Well that's still better than the time when you tried to claim 100-50 wasn't 50 :)  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,858
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    onegroupholiday
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • A Freeman went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Tony Eveland earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dick Green earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...