West Posted June 14 Report Share Posted June 14 (edited) https://www.foxnews.com/media/judge-tells-elderly-pro-life-activist-concerned-dying-prison-make-every-effort-remain-alive Goes after a 75 year old lady for peacefully protesting murdering infants in the womb Edited June 14 by West Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 14 Report Share Posted June 14 Merrick Garland is neither prosecuting, nor rendering sentencing in this case. IOW, you're lying pathetically. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted June 14 Author Report Share Posted June 14 3 minutes ago, robosmith said: Merrick Garland is neither prosecuting, nor rendering sentencing in this case. IOW, you're lying pathetically. He represents the DOJ... DUH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 14 Report Share Posted June 14 (edited) 19 minutes ago, West said: He represents the DOJ... DUH The DoJ is huge. You're delusional if you believe the AG micromanages at that level. Judges are not even part of the DoJ No, they do not. The federal judiciary and the United States Department of Justice are COMPLETELY separate from each other. They belong to two different branches of government.Sep 11, 2022 In the United States, do courts belong to the Department of ... Edited June 14 by robosmith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted June 14 Author Report Share Posted June 14 11 minutes ago, robosmith said: The DoJ is huge. You're delusional if you believe the AG micromanages at that level. Judges are not even part of the DoJ No, they do not. The federal judiciary and the United States Department of Justice are COMPLETELY separate from each other. They belong to two different branches of government.Sep 11, 2022 In the United States, do courts belong to the Department of ... Well then this crazy guy needs to reign in all these political prosecutions. Going at a 75 year old lady for protesting is vile 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted June 14 Report Share Posted June 14 1 hour ago, West said: https://www.foxnews.com/media/judge-tells-elderly-pro-life-activist-concerned-dying-prison-make-every-effort-remain-alive Goes after a 75 year old lady for peacefully protesting murdering infants in the womb BULLSH1T! You freaking liar. She wasn’t “peacefully protesting”, she was physically blocking access to a healthcare facility. That’s illegal, she knew it was illegal, they asked her over and over and over and over again and again again to remove herself. She wanted to get arrested and “prove her point,” so… FINE. If you want to get yourself arrested to “prove your point,” then don’t complain about the repercussions. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 15 Report Share Posted June 15 4 hours ago, West said: Well then this crazy guy needs to reign in all these political prosecutions. Going at a 75 year old lady for protesting is vile The judge and/or jury found her guilty of blocking access, not the prosecutor. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted June 15 Report Share Posted June 15 We need to do away with the FACE Act. The same damn people on this thread cheering on putting her in prison for blocking movement into an abortion clinic are the same people cheering on Hamas protestors blocking people on roads and schools. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodad Posted June 15 Report Share Posted June 15 As Republicans are so fond of saying (when it's convenient) "If you can't do the time, don't do the crime." I have zero sympathy for zealots who go out of their way to harass women seeking health care. This is functionally the same principle as violating a restraining order. The only thing you have to do to follow this law is to be a decent person and leave the poor women alone. It's not an accidental slip-up. You have to go out of your way to deliberately break this law. Well, she got what she wanted. Probably should have thought about her husband's feelings before she made that choice. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted June 15 Author Report Share Posted June 15 4 hours ago, Rebound said: BULLSH1T! You freaking liar. She wasn’t “peacefully protesting”, she was physically blocking access to a healthcare facility. That’s illegal, she knew it was illegal, they asked her over and over and over and over again and again again to remove herself. She wanted to get arrested and “prove her point,” so… FINE. If you want to get yourself arrested to “prove your point,” then don’t complain about the repercussions. You are a f'ing joke supporting this messed up nazi regime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 15 Report Share Posted June 15 2 hours ago, West said: You are a f'ing joke supporting this messed up nazi regime. You got NO REASON for ^this infantile outburst. Every society has laws and enforcing them doesn't make it "nazi regime." Pretending that your preferences are superior to elected government, just makes YOU the Nazi FASCIST. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted June 15 Report Share Posted June 15 A 75 year old lady. Garland, the DOJ, and all the soulless Tweenkies who support those sort of garbage, are deplorable little fcks who deserve all the ridicule and more, that can be dished out. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reason10 Posted June 15 Report Share Posted June 15 17 hours ago, West said: https://www.foxnews.com/media/judge-tells-elderly-pro-life-activist-concerned-dying-prison-make-every-effort-remain-alive Goes after a 75 year old lady for peacefully protesting murdering infants in the womb America REALLY dodged a bullet when the Senate refused to allow Saddam Hussein Obama to replace Justice Scalia with this Nazi. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted June 15 Report Share Posted June 15 13 hours ago, User said: We need to do away with the FACE Act. The same damn people on this thread cheering on putting her in prison for blocking movement into an abortion clinic are the same people cheering on Hamas protestors blocking people on roads and schools. I am proof that your claim is untrue. The terrorist supporters who want to get themselves arrested are succeeding at getting themselves arrested. Then, like you, they protest the fact that they managed to get themselves arrested. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted June 15 Author Report Share Posted June 15 1 hour ago, reason10 said: America REALLY dodged a bullet when the Senate refused to allow Saddam Hussein Obama to replace Justice Scalia with this Nazi. This man is as evil as they come 7 hours ago, Nationalist said: A 75 year old lady. Garland, the DOJ, and all the soulless Tweenkies who support those sort of garbage, are deplorable little fcks who deserve all the ridicule and more, that can be dished out. A 75 year old lady with health issues is not a public safety threat. This is straight up nazism where they target the elderly first because they can't fight back It's sick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodad Posted June 15 Report Share Posted June 15 7 hours ago, Nationalist said: A 75 year old lady. Garland, the DOJ, and all the soulless Tweenkies who support those sort of garbage, are deplorable little fcks who deserve all the ridicule and more, that can be dished out. Yes, everyone knows that when you turn 70 laws don't apply anymore.🙄 It's a free pass. You should try it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted June 15 Report Share Posted June 15 2 hours ago, Rebound said: I am proof that your claim is untrue. The terrorist supporters who want to get themselves arrested are succeeding at getting themselves arrested. Then, like you, they protest the fact that they managed to get themselves arrested. There are exceptions to every rule. 2 hours ago, Hodad said: Yes, everyone knows that when you turn 70 laws don't apply anymore.🙄 It's a free pass. You should try it. Being old was a free pass for Biden. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted June 15 Author Report Share Posted June 15 4 hours ago, Hodad said: Yes, everyone knows that when you turn 70 laws don't apply anymore.🙄 It's a free pass. You should try it. Her religious beliefs are the only reason she was jailed. A clear violation of her civil rights.. just as the Nazis did during the 1930s and 40s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 15 Report Share Posted June 15 16 minutes ago, West said: Her religious beliefs are the only reason she was jailed. A clear violation of her civil rights.. just as the Nazis did during the 1930s and 40s Why do you believe anyone outside of the MAGA CULT would believe ^this raving lunacy over the top officials of the US government who are just enforcing the law? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legato Posted June 15 Report Share Posted June 15 4 minutes ago, robosmith said: Why do you believe anyone outside of the MAGA CULT would believe ^this raving lunacy over the top officials of the US government who are just enforcing the law? ....only when it suits them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 15 Report Share Posted June 15 45 minutes ago, Legato said: ....only when it suits them. Prosecutorial DISCRETION is commonly accepted privilege, unlike ^these opinions of random interwebz whack jobs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted June 15 Author Report Share Posted June 15 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Why do you believe anyone outside of the MAGA CULT would believe ^this raving lunacy over the top officials of the US government who are just enforcing the law? The guy who refuses to adhere to a subpoena and only targets people based on politics and religion much like the Nazis.. It's sad to see how democrats will no longer stand for civil rights. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted June 15 Report Share Posted June 15 4 minutes ago, West said: The guy who refuses to adhere to a subpoena and only targets people based on politics and religion much like the Nazis.. It's sad to see how democrats will no longer stand for civil rights. The woman violated the law by blocking access, lunatic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodad Posted June 15 Report Share Posted June 15 2 hours ago, West said: Her religious beliefs are the only reason she was jailed. A clear violation of her civil rights.. just as the Nazis did during the 1930s and 40s You are a liar. Obviously, she was not arrested for her beliefs. She is welcome to believe whatever absurd shit she wants. She was arrested for her actions--actions taken against other people in violation of their rights. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted June 16 Author Report Share Posted June 16 19 hours ago, Hodad said: You are a liar. Obviously, she was not arrested for her beliefs. She is welcome to believe whatever absurd shit she wants. She was arrested for her actions--actions taken against other people in violation of their rights. Yeah she was. Democrats are going full out nazi now against anyone who opposes civil rights abuses Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.