Merrick Garland's cowardice on display, targets 75 year old lady for federal prison time over a protest

[West]

https://www.foxnews.com/media/judge-tells-elderly-pro-life-activist-concerned-dying-prison-make-every-effort-remain-alive

Goes after a 75 year old lady for peacefully protesting murdering infants in the womb

Edited June 14, 2024 by West

[robosmith]

Merrick Garland is neither prosecuting, nor rendering sentencing in this case.

IOW, you're lying pathetically.

[West]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Merrick Garland is neither prosecuting, nor rendering sentencing in this case.

IOW, you're lying pathetically.

He represents the DOJ... DUH

[robosmith]

19 minutes ago, West said:

He represents the DOJ... DUH

The DoJ is huge. You're delusional if you believe the AG micromanages at that level.

Judges are not even part of the DoJ

No, they do not. The federal judiciary and the United States Department of Justice are COMPLETELY separate from each other. They belong to two different branches of government.Sep 11, 2022

 

In the United States, do courts belong to the Department of ...

Edited June 14, 2024 by robosmith

[West]

11 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The DoJ is huge. You're delusional if you believe the AG micromanages at that level.

Judges are not even part of the DoJ

No, they do not. The federal judiciary and the United States Department of Justice are COMPLETELY separate from each other. They belong to two different branches of government.Sep 11, 2022

 

In the United States, do courts belong to the Department of ...

Well then this crazy guy needs to reign in all these political prosecutions. 

Going at a 75 year old lady for protesting is vile

[Rebound]

1 hour ago, West said:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/judge-tells-elderly-pro-life-activist-concerned-dying-prison-make-every-effort-remain-alive

Goes after a 75 year old lady for peacefully protesting murdering infants in the womb

BULLSH1T!  You freaking liar. 

She wasn’t “peacefully protesting”, she was physically blocking access to a healthcare facility. That’s illegal, she knew it was illegal, they asked her over and over and over and over again and again again to remove herself. She wanted to get arrested and “prove her point,” so… FINE. If you want to get yourself arrested to “prove your point,” then don’t complain about the repercussions. 

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, West said:

Well then this crazy guy needs to reign in all these political prosecutions. 

Going at a 75 year old lady for protesting is vile

The judge and/or jury found her guilty of blocking access, not the prosecutor.

[User]

We need to do away with the FACE Act. 

The same damn people on this thread cheering on putting her in prison for blocking movement into an abortion clinic are the same people cheering on Hamas protestors blocking people on roads and schools. 

 

[Hodad]

As Republicans are so fond of saying (when it's convenient) "If you can't do the time, don't do the crime."

I have zero sympathy for zealots who go out of their way to harass women seeking health care. This is functionally the same principle as violating a restraining order.

The only thing you have to do to follow this law is to be a decent person and leave the poor women alone. It's not an accidental slip-up. You have to go out of your way to deliberately break this law. Well, she got what she wanted. Probably should have thought about her husband's feelings before she made that choice.

[West]

4 hours ago, Rebound said:

BULLSH1T!  You freaking liar. 

She wasn’t “peacefully protesting”, she was physically blocking access to a healthcare facility. That’s illegal, she knew it was illegal, they asked her over and over and over and over again and again again to remove herself. She wanted to get arrested and “prove her point,” so… FINE. If you want to get yourself arrested to “prove your point,” then don’t complain about the repercussions. 

You are a f'ing joke supporting this messed up nazi regime. 

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, West said:

You are a f'ing joke supporting this messed up nazi regime. 

You got NO REASON for ^this infantile outburst. Every society has laws and enforcing them doesn't make it "nazi regime."

Pretending that your preferences are superior to elected government, just makes YOU the Nazi FASCIST.

[Nationalist]

A 75 year old lady.

Garland, the DOJ, and all the soulless Tweenkies who support those sort of garbage, are deplorable little fcks who deserve all the ridicule and more, that can be dished out.

[reason10]

17 hours ago, West said:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/judge-tells-elderly-pro-life-activist-concerned-dying-prison-make-every-effort-remain-alive

Goes after a 75 year old lady for peacefully protesting murdering infants in the womb

America REALLY dodged a bullet when the Senate refused to allow Saddam Hussein  Obama to replace Justice Scalia with this Nazi.

[Rebound]

13 hours ago, User said:

We need to do away with the FACE Act. 

The same damn people on this thread cheering on putting her in prison for blocking movement into an abortion clinic are the same people cheering on Hamas protestors blocking people on roads and schools. 

 

I am proof that your claim is untrue. 
The terrorist supporters who want to get themselves arrested are succeeding at getting themselves arrested.  Then, like you, they protest the fact that they managed to get themselves arrested.  

[West]

1 hour ago, reason10 said:

America REALLY dodged a bullet when the Senate refused to allow Saddam Hussein  Obama to replace Justice Scalia with this Nazi.

This man is as evil as they come

7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

A 75 year old lady.

Garland, the DOJ, and all the soulless Tweenkies who support those sort of garbage, are deplorable little fcks who deserve all the ridicule and more, that can be dished out.

A 75 year old lady with health issues is not a public safety threat. This is straight up nazism where they target the elderly first because they can't fight back

It's sick

[Hodad]

7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

A 75 year old lady.

Garland, the DOJ, and all the soulless Tweenkies who support those sort of garbage, are deplorable little fcks who deserve all the ridicule and more, that can be dished out.

Yes, everyone knows that when you turn 70 laws don't apply anymore.🙄

It's a free pass. You should try it.

[User]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

I am proof that your claim is untrue. 
The terrorist supporters who want to get themselves arrested are succeeding at getting themselves arrested.  Then, like you, they protest the fact that they managed to get themselves arrested.  

There are exceptions to every rule. 

 

2 hours ago, Hodad said:

Yes, everyone knows that when you turn 70 laws don't apply anymore.🙄

It's a free pass. You should try it.

Being old was a free pass for Biden. 

[West]

4 hours ago, Hodad said:

Yes, everyone knows that when you turn 70 laws don't apply anymore.🙄

It's a free pass. You should try it.

Her religious beliefs are the only reason she was jailed. A clear violation of her civil rights.. just as the Nazis did during the 1930s and 40s

[robosmith]

16 minutes ago, West said:

Her religious beliefs are the only reason she was jailed. A clear violation of her civil rights.. just as the Nazis did during the 1930s and 40s

Why do you believe anyone outside of the MAGA CULT would believe ^this raving lunacy over the top officials of the US government who are just enforcing the law?

[Legato]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Why do you believe anyone outside of the MAGA CULT would believe ^this raving lunacy over the top officials of the US government who are just enforcing the law?

....only when it suits them.

[robosmith]

45 minutes ago, Legato said:

....only when it suits them.

Prosecutorial DISCRETION is commonly accepted privilege, unlike ^these opinions of random interwebz whack jobs.

[West]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Why do you believe anyone outside of the MAGA CULT would believe ^this raving lunacy over the top officials of the US government who are just enforcing the law?

The guy who refuses to adhere to a subpoena and only targets people based on politics and religion much like the Nazis.. 

It's sad to see how democrats will no longer stand for civil rights. 

[robosmith]

4 minutes ago, West said:

The guy who refuses to adhere to a subpoena and only targets people based on politics and religion much like the Nazis.. 

It's sad to see how democrats will no longer stand for civil rights. 

The woman violated the law by blocking access, lunatic.

[Hodad]

2 hours ago, West said:

Her religious beliefs are the only reason she was jailed. A clear violation of her civil rights.. just as the Nazis did during the 1930s and 40s

You are a liar.

Obviously, she was not arrested for her beliefs. She is welcome to believe whatever absurd shit she wants. She was arrested for her actions--actions taken against other people in violation of their rights. 

[West]

19 hours ago, Hodad said:

You are a liar.

Obviously, she was not arrested for her beliefs. She is welcome to believe whatever absurd shit she wants. She was arrested for her actions--actions taken against other people in violation of their rights. 

Yeah she was. 

Democrats are going full out nazi now against anyone who opposes civil rights abuses