PROVEN: Republicans Actually DO Shoot Puppies in the Face

[Aristides]

On 5/1/2024 at 7:13 PM, Nationalist said:

Oh get a grip on your wee self.

Even I've seen my uncle shoot a dog, and drown barnyard kittens.

Gawd ur such a dweeb.

Ah, so that means it is OK.

[Aristides]

Maybe the dog wasn't cut out to be a working dog. Lots of failed working dogs still become great pets. The woman obviously feels animals are a commodity to  be disposed of as they see fit.

[robosmith]

On 5/1/2024 at 4:55 AM, Nationalist said:

Noem definitely made a mistake talking about this. Meh...she'll learn. At least she's not butt-ugly and cackles like a witch...

The Libbies have jumped on this like locusts to a grain field. Yet...they are saddled with Brandon and Witchie-poo so...

MANY cons here have said Noam is TOAST for VP, your speculation notwithstanding.

One thing Trump rejects is a political liability TO HIM.

On 5/1/2024 at 7:40 AM, lahr said:

Democrats are not honest about much of anything.  Their ideology is based on lies.  

You're talking about the pathological LIAR Trump. Who has thoroughly CONNED YOU.

[robosmith]

On 5/1/2024 at 8:05 AM, WestCanMan said:

"Run Toto, run! It's Hunter Biden coming to rape us, just because he's a democrat and he knows he can get away with it!"

That's Trump, "When you're a star, they let you do it." 🤮

[robosmith]

On 5/1/2024 at 3:56 PM, BeaverFever said:

LMAO they only liar here is you, you internet kook

 

You LIE that the dog bit her or anyone else 

 

You LIE that a dog going after chickens especially an adolescent hunting dog she trained to go after pheasants is unusual 

You are such a rabid internet kook you will say anything to defend your cult members from even the most heinous Actually that that the majority of society including republicans condemn 

 

Ps I love being called “low-IQ” by a low-income high school dropout liek you whose shown repeatedly his mental capacity has never evolved past his early adolescent years  You’re a hilarious joke  

 

Noam ONLY SAID the dog TRIED to bite her.

[User]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

She certainly WAS NOT forced to kill it. There are many ASPCA who would take it off her hands.

LOL, the ASPCA has killed far more dogs. They hoard their money in investments and offshore bank accounts. There have been numerous stories on how they have hundreds of millions in money hoarded away, they pay hundreds of their employees 6 figure salaries while giving 2% to 7%  to animal shelters. 

The ASPCA. LOL

What next, PETA? They kill dogs like they were Hitler enacting a final solution. 

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, User said:

LOL, the ASPCA has killed far more dogs. They hoard their money in investments and offshore bank accounts. There have been numerous stories on how they have hundreds of millions in money hoarded away, they pay hundreds of their employees 6 figure salaries while giving 2% to 7%  to animal shelters. 

The ASPCA. LOL

What next, PETA? They kill dogs like they were Hitler enacting a final solution. 

I'm sure there is a REASON why you post NO EVIDENCE for your BS.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

I'm sure there is a REASON why you post NO EVIDENCE for your BS.

LOL @User  -  all they have is sealioning   

 

[Nationalist]

10 hours ago, Aristides said:

Ah, so that means it is OK.

It means it's something that has to be done. Not everything needs to be pleasant. 

[User]

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

I'm sure there is a REASON why you post NO EVIDENCE for your BS.

Its not that you question me and ask for a source... the fact that you assert it is BS is the problem. That is no longer just you wondering if its true or not, or if I can back it up or not. No, that is you asserting it is false too. 

Something so easy to google or know if you pay any attention at all to these things. As you have already learned from me, I bring the receipts... and then you run away. 

ASPCA spending may not be what donors expect, CBS News investigation finds

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/aspca-spending-donor-cbs-news-investigation/

Public outcry follows ASPCA decision to euthanize Oreo, ‘miracle’ dog who survived six-story fall

https://www.latimes.com/archives/blogs/la-unleashed/story/2009-11-18/public-outcry-follows-aspca-decision-to-euthanize-oreo-miracle-dog-who-survived-six-story-fall

PETA's Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad History of Killing Animals

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/03/petas-terrible-horrible-no-good-very-bad-history-of-killing-animals/254130/

[WestCanMan]

20 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

Bullshit once again you prove you know nothing.  

In fact Golden Retrievers rank #3 in the number of dog bite incidents Look it upl Not because they’re vicious breed but because they’re popular and all dogs bite if they aren’t properly looked after an any breed can produce a dog who’s just naturally disposed to agression

 

My Brother in Law had a golden with a biting problem with multiple people having to get stitches over the years especially as he got on in. They finally took him to a vet and put him down. Not shot in the face.

You claim you know the difference between a nip and a bite but since Noem doesn’t provide any description of the dog biting anyone there’s no way you could tell.  As Ive said many times and as you keep ignoring, she describes in detail the chickens, which is natural dog behaviour especially for a hunting dog, and the embarrassing behaviour on the hunting trip but sh barely mentions its aggression or biting towards humans other than a sentence fragment to state that it happened. Any intelligent person could tell that she’s bullshitting and since you are clearly not an intelligent person it’s no surprise that’s lost on you. 
 

Lastly she says herself she “hated that dog”. Most people don’t ”hate” their dogs even if they’re aggressive or poorly behaved. They simply decide the dog is not right for them. She hated the puppy because it embarrassed her and she had to pay for the chickens (never come between a Republican and their money).  So she shot it in the face. Any claim of hers that she killed it for safety or it’s aggression towards humans is clearly lacking evidence in the book, and there is no explanation for why it had to be killed instead of given away which is what normal nom-psycho people do. 

So by your own admission:

• some dogs just need to be put down. 
• She had the dog for 14 months, and was intimately aware of its demeanour & history of violence, compared to all of her other dogs who were well-behaved in the exact same situations, and she made a decision. 

This wasn't a situation where the dog went on an exuberant romp and then got shot in the face.

 

You're such a small partisan chump and such a liar that you chose to mischaracterize her whole story and post your fabrication here instead of just sitting in your mom's basement stroking your little hate boner, as usual. 

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, User said:

Its not that you question me and ask for a source... the fact that you assert it is BS is the problem. That is no longer just you wondering if its true or not, or if I can back it up or not. No, that is you asserting it is false too. 

Something so easy to google or know if you pay any attention at all to these things. As you have already learned from me, I bring the receipts... and then you run away. 

ASPCA spending may not be what donors expect, CBS News investigation finds

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/aspca-spending-donor-cbs-news-investigation/

Public outcry follows ASPCA decision to euthanize Oreo, ‘miracle’ dog who survived six-story fall

https://www.latimes.com/archives/blogs/la-unleashed/story/2009-11-18/public-outcry-follows-aspca-decision-to-euthanize-oreo-miracle-dog-who-survived-six-story-fall

PETA's Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad History of Killing Animals

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/03/petas-terrible-horrible-no-good-very-bad-history-of-killing-animals/254130/

well,  now that you've gone through that effort i'm SURE he'll be right back here any minute now to acknowledge you were absolutely right and apologize for not having taken the time to look it  up himself. and will concede that your point was valid.

He's probably just thinking about how best to show his appreciation for your efforts. Won't take a sec. 

Aaaaaanny  minute now...    (cricket!)