The Woke Mind Virus

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, Deluge said:

Conservatives welcome opinions and debate, but not at the expense of their core values.

I'd argue that conservatives usually stay in polite debate mode for too long. 

Leftists know that they can tell blatant lies without getting directly called out as liars, so they do it constantly.

Quote

Your problem is that you're trying to be civil with wild animals.

It's much worse than that. At various times he's a rabid supporter, enabler, sycophant, apologist, or just turns a blind eye to their dirty dealings.  

If he's a conservative, I'm from Pluto. 

[Deluge]

4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I'd argue that conservatives usually stay in polite debate mode for too long. 

Leftists know that they can tell blatant lies without getting directly called out as liars, so they do it constantly.

 

It's much worse than that. At various times he's a rabid supporter, enabler, sycophant, apologist, or just turns a blind eye to their dirty dealings.  

If he's a conservative, I'm from Pluto. 

It's true, isn't it. Look at the two fat ass DA's dogging Trump: They talk all kinds of shit, in PUBLIC mind you, and they still get away with it. 

You know Mike better than I do, but I can easily take your word for it. Sometimes I think he's just another roboshill trying to dupe conservatives. 

[Deluge]

55 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Guess Wokeness hasn’t died after all. 

You must be relieved. 

It is on a downturn though, as more and more companies are pulling their heads out of the left's ass. 

[Michael Hardner]

55 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

1. They are filth.

2. It is going well. DeSantis is the undisputed governor of Florida.

1. Filth is to be removed, not kept.  This is why such language is the trademark of the intolerant.

2. Just like he wanted to be? Or... 🤔

[Nationalist]

2 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. Filth is to be removed, not kept.  This is why such language is the trademark of the intolerant.

2. Just like he wanted to be? Or... 🤔

1. Yes filth is to be removed...from being given any credibility what so ever.

2. Yes. Just like he wants to be...for now.

[Michael Hardner]

30 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

1. Yet you've supported Trudeau when he was hate mongering conservatives and the unvaxed.

2. How much further left can you be than to participate in/support hate-mongering?

1. 2. I didn't.

I just spent 10 minutes searching and JFC... You and I actually had this conversation last May! 

And I condemned Trudeau in front of your face. 

 Are you going to make the same mistake next year and say I supported him again? Please bookmark my quote here, and add it to your browser. Quick links.

 

 

40 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Yet you've supported Trudeau when he was hate mongering conservatives and the unvaxed. How much further left can you be than to participate in/support hate-mongering?

And let the records show, that your post here is liked TWICE 😂

[Michael Hardner]

40 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Conservatives welcome opinions and debate, but not at the expense of their core values. Your problem is that you're trying to be civil with those wild animals. You probably think they are superior and you want their respect. 

I tell it like it is, Mike; you tell it like the left wants to hear ...

Opinions and debate are my core values. 

Calling people, animals and filth... Not conservative. At least now you're saying that I'm speaking to the left, and I'm not left myself.

9 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

1. Yes filth is to be removed...from being given any credibility what so ever.

2. Yes. Just like he wants to be...for now.

1. That's not conservative, that's fascist. 

2. Then why did he run for president? Why did he lose by trying to ban ideas? Because America actually is conservative is why.

[Nationalist]

2 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Opinions and debate are my core values. 

Calling people, animals and filth... Not conservative. At least now you're saying that I'm speaking to the left, and I'm not left myself.

1. That's not conservative, that's fascist. 

2. Then why did he run for president? Why did he lose by trying to ban ideas? Because America actually is conservative is why.

1. How is that fascist? For just about ever, society ignored the loons of the population. Gave them no coverage. No credibility.  That wasn't fascist it was common sense.

2. Why did he run? You'd have to ask him. I'd say it was to be a backstop incase Garland manages to disqualify Trump. And some ideas need controlling. Or should Hustler magazine be put in the libraries of schools?

[Deluge]

2 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. Opinions and debate are my core values. 

2. Calling people, animals and filth... Not conservative.

3. At least now you're saying that I'm speaking to the left, and I'm not left myself.

1. Then your core values are out of whack. This is a battle for beliefs and ideas, not a high school competition. 

2. Sure it is; it's aggressive conservatism, and leftoids hate it. I tell the truth and I "put some stank on it". It's effective, but you can't be a **** about it.

3. No, I'm actually beginning to think that you're a left-wing shill. 

 

 

[Michael Hardner]

40 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

1. How is that fascist? For just about ever, society ignored the loons of the population. Gave them no coverage. No credibility.  That wasn't fascist it was common sense.

2. Why did he run? You'd have to ask him.

3. Or should Hustler magazine be put in the libraries of schools?

1. Because filth is never respectable.  The metaphor is not to paint your discussion partner as debatable but as someone to be stopped.  Calling so-called loons "filth" and human garbage isn't civilized.

2. Because he wanted to win is why.

3. Is Hustler filth?  If so, should it just be destroyed?

[Michael Hardner]

32 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. Then your core values are out of whack.  

2. Sure it is; it's aggressive conservatism, and leftoids hate it. I tell the truth and I "put some stank on it". It's effective, but you can't be a **** about it.

3. No, I'm actually beginning to think that you're a left-wing shill. 

 

 

1. 2. Opinions are protected by Western Constitutional basics.  Good to see where you stand.

3. You didn't say why you're not imprisoning and killing the filth.

[Deluge]

3 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. 2. Opinions are protected by Western Constitutional basics.  Good to see where you stand.

3. You didn't say why you're not imprisoning and killing the filth.

1 & 2. And we both know that you stand on the left with your opinions.  

3. Yes I did. But like a true leftoid, you only took in what you wanted to take in if you took in any of that post at all. 

[WestCanMan]

57 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. 2. I didn't.

I just spent 10 minutes searching and JFC... You and I actually had this conversation last May! 

And I condemned Trudeau in front of your face. 

 Are you going to make the same mistake next year and say I supported him again? Please bookmark my quote here, and add it to your browser. Quick links.

 

 

And let the records show, that your post here is liked TWICE 😂

Mike, you and I have had lengthy conversations about whether or not there were a bunch of confederate and Nazi flags at the convoy, or whether or not the MSM was just gaslighting us. 

If you want to contend that that wasn't you, then for sure I've tried to corner you into admitting that it was hate speech by Trudeau when he went to categorize the unvaxed as "very often racists and misogynists" but you wouldn't. 

Would you like to speak for the record now?

1. Was our MSM was completely bogus in their attempts to categorize the Freedom Convoy as rowdy, disrespectful, destructive, racists"?
2. Was it a complete joke for Trudeau to pretend that our own Feedom Convoy were a bunch of reprobates who were beyond contemptible, but BLM supporetrs were the kinds of people we should all respect and admire? 
3. Was it hate-mongering for Trudeau to say that the unvaxed were very often racists and misgynists? 

[Michael Hardner]

14 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1 & 2. And we both know that you stand on the left with your opinions.  

3. Yes I did. But like a true leftoid, you only took in what you wanted to take in if you took in any of that post at all. 

1. TIL that constitutions are leftist.

3. I guess I missed it.

Ok, back to ignore now... night night... 😴

[Michael Hardner]

15 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Mike, you and I have had lengthy conversations about whether or not there were a bunch of confederate and Nazi flags at the convoy, or whether or not the MSM was just gaslighting us. 

 

Would you like to speak for the record now?

Did you read this post?  I already did that I'm pretty sure.

Here are my words again for the last time:

"But shame on him [Trudeau] for using the type of logic I decry on here ... translation "The antivax people are often... mysogynist, racist" Mr. Trudeau does not address people who have specific complaints and legitimate ones also"

[Deluge]

7 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. TIL that constitutions are leftist.

3. I guess I missed it.

Ok, back to ignore now... night night... 😴

Sleep well, and please be safe in your wokeness approved safety space.  

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I'd argue that conservatives usually stay in polite debate mode for too long. 

No one can accuse YOU of ^this. Your responses OFTEN resort to "stupid" in the first sentence.

[Deluge]

22 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No one can accuse YOU of ^this. Your responses OFTEN resort to "stupid" in the first sentence.

robowoke thinks the truth is stupid. Now there's a surprise...

[Deluge]

Woke bullshit from nobody's friend, the Human Rights Campaign:

https://www.hrc.org/resources/get-the-facts-on-gender-affirming-care

[Deluge]

"Everyone deserves to be treated with dignity and respect. But across the country, politicians desperate to gain power and their allies in the media are attacking LGBTQ+ people and making it impossible, particularly for transgender and non-binary youth, to be their authentic selves."

1. Define "attacking". 

2. "Their authentic selves". This one's tricky because adults are all over this shit right now, so it's hard to determine which kids have been influenced/pressured by these hardened leftists and which truly have some kind of brain disorder. 

 

[Nationalist]

22 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. Because filth is never respectable.  The metaphor is not to paint your discussion partner as debatable but as someone to be stopped.  Calling so-called loons "filth" and human garbage isn't civilized.

2. Because he wanted to win is why.

3. Is Hustler filth?  If so, should it just be destroyed?

1. And chuds is? 

2. You say that like you know...which I doubt you do.

3. It was destroyed already by internet porn. But your attempt to warp what I said ain'-a-work. I said it doesn't belong in schools. 

You like to think yourself intelligent...yet when pressed you go for the same old Libbie warping of reality in hopes nobody notices.

Mike...lots of us notice.

[Michael Hardner]

17 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

1. And chuds is? 

2. You say that like you know...which I doubt you do.

3. You like to think yourself intelligent... 

1. "Chuds" is like "clowns" or "idi0ts".  It's an insult but not calling someone inhuman.  The language of fascism has specific markers.
2. So... let's get this straight: DeSantis ran for president... but DIDN'T want to win ?  And you have created this rationale why again ?  Oh, because you're stubbornly refusing to admit that DeSantis' agenda failed him.   Ok, let's move on... your rationale makes no sense to me but you will clearly go to the ends of the earth to defend it.
3. Who said so ?  I sure didn't.  I like to think of myself is learning - which is why I try to figure out what your thinking is, in case I missed something.  But as with point 2, I find out that you will never concede a point because you want to "win" a discussion.  I don't see things that way here...

I lost, you won... moving on.

[Nationalist]

44 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. "Chuds" is like "clowns" or "idi0ts".  It's an insult but not calling someone inhuman.  The language of fascism has specific markers.
2. So... let's get this straight: DeSantis ran for president... but DIDN'T want to win ?  And you have created this rationale why again ?  Oh, because you're stubbornly refusing to admit that DeSantis' agenda failed him.   Ok, let's move on... your rationale makes no sense to me but you will clearly go to the ends of the earth to defend it.
3. Who said so ?  I sure didn't.  I like to think of myself is learning - which is why I try to figure out what your thinking is, in case I missed something.  But as with point 2, I find out that you will never concede a point because you want to "win" a discussion.  I don't see things that way here...

I lost, you won... moving on.

Mike...

1. I never said "inhuman". You're warping reality again.

2. I said I think he may have gotten in to the race as a form of insurance. You're warping reality again.

3. Concede what point Mike? That you continuously warp reality? You may get away with this crap with dullards, but when matched with intellect, you crumble and fall back on warping reality in order to what? Pat yourself on the back, block the nasty person who called you on your BS, and proceed with an undeserved aire of superiority?

Buddy...you just ain't that sharp. You're...IMO...an ideologue caught up in the very culture war you profess to abhore.

[Michael Hardner]

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

 

1. I never said "inhuman". You're warping reality again.

2. I said I think he may have gotten in to the race as a form of insurance. You're warping reality again.

3. Concede what point Mike? That you continuously warp reality? 

4...  proceed with an undeserved aire of superiority?

5. Buddy...you just ain't that sharp. You're...IMO...an ideologue caught up in the very culture war you profess to abhore.

1. "Vermin" IS inhuman.  Calling people scum, animals, vermin... is saying they're not people.
2. How am *I* warping reality when you think that somebody put that much money and reputation on the line as "a form of insurance".... my god you are stubborn
3. Reality like.... DeSantis ran for President as "insurance" ?  
4. I only have an aire [sic] over my spelling prowess.
5. Once again - dullard - I JUST SAID that I never said I was sharp.  btw all those red squiggly lines in your browser are misspelt words...
 

[Michael Hardner]

I just Googled "Why did Ron DeSantis run for president ?" insurance

Zero hits.

Nobody on the whole internet has suggested this crazy idea.

None.

But I am warping reality folks.

And I'm doing it because I think I'm smart.