Canada just posted its fastest two-month immigration in history. This graph shows just how high it is.

[ExFlyer]

10 hours ago, I am Groot said:

Expressing a difference of opinion when talking about the rise of antisemitism in Canada would be something like disagreeing there is a rise of antisemitism in Canada, not laughing at the complaint.

Buddy, everything on this web site is rhetoric.

 

Ahh, there are different opinions based on how you feel about the other person statement? Seems quite discriminatory to me.

If everything is rhetoric, why do you take such exception to anything said that does not agree with you?

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Ahh, there are different opinions based on how you feel about the other person statement? Seems quite discriminatory to me.

If everything is rhetoric, why do you take such exception to anything said that does not agree with you?

Because while everything is rhetoric, not everything is stupid.  Whereas you're stupid.  Pretty simple.  Lots of people can make contrary arguments but make them well and it's easy to accept and disagree with that.  Then there's people like you -  you post ass-porn as your argument and pretty much everything else you say is dumber than a stump.  So people don't respect you and this is the result.

[I am Groot]

3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Ahh, there are different opinions based on how you feel about the other person statement? Seems quite discriminatory to me.

If everything is rhetoric, why do you take such exception to anything said that does not agree with you?

The degree of exception I take to a statement depends on my perception of the statement, or what lies behind it. Like all Nationalists, I take particular exception to statements that I see as going against my country, or the cultural identity and values represented by it. Antisemitism goes against that cultural identity and values, and is thus not to be tolerated. 

[ExFlyer]

3 hours ago, I am Groot said:

The degree of exception I take to a statement depends on my perception of the statement, or what lies behind it. Like all Nationalists, I take particular exception to statements that I see as going against my country, or the cultural identity and values represented by it. Antisemitism goes against that cultural identity and values, and is thus not to be tolerated. 

I am not sure what you see is behind my comments except perhaps your perception?

I also cannot see where my comment goes against your country.

Discrimination, against others has been part of this country since we became a country and even before that. In the beginning we did not like some of the indigenous that did not do what we wanted or did not trade with us. Before that, the indigenous themselves fought one another because they did not like each other so, discrimination, by any name has been around forever.'

Just because the jewish people have a special name (antisemitism was coined by a German) for it changes nothing, it is discrimination against a peoples.

[I am Groot]

1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

Just because the jewish people have a special name (antisemitism was coined by a German) for it changes nothing, it is discrimination against a peoples.

I'm aware of the historical nature of discrimination/prejudice/bigotry/racism and how it thrived throughout the world throughout history, and is still pretty much the norm in non-Western societies today. 

But the cultural norm of this country that I like is the absence of it. And as I wrote above, Jews are the canary in the coalmine given the long, long, long history of animus directed toward them since biblical times.

[ExFlyer]

15 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

I'm aware of the historical nature of discrimination/prejudice/bigotry/racism and how it thrived throughout the world throughout history, and is still pretty much the norm in non-Western societies today. 

But the cultural norm of this country that I like is the absence of it. And as I wrote above, Jews are the canary in the coalmine given the long, long, long history of animus directed toward them since biblical times.

The unfortunate thing is there is no and never has been an "absence of it".

Blacks have been N****rs. Indigenous have been red men, injuns and many other names. Germans have been  Nazis. Polish are polocks. Japanese have been slant eyes. All Indians have been Pakis....and on  and on.

Picking one group is being naive.

It would be nice if there is an "absence of it" but...

Edited March 24 by ExFlyer

[taxme]

On 3/22/2024 at 10:51 AM, CdnFox said:

https://www.forexlive.com/news/canada-just-posted-its-fastest-two-month-immigration-in-history-what-happens-next-20240321/

 

 

So - the bottom line is we have a growth problem.  And interestingly if you put the rise in housing prices up against this graph since 2015 they look pretty similar.

The housing problem is already severe but in 2023 housing starts went DOWN. And this immigration is going to continue at about this level for at least this year and most of next.

 

So by the end of 2024/2025 i bet we're still wrestling with serious inflation issues as well as severe shortages of housing and increasing rental rates.

It's like justin WANTS to destroy the liberal party AND canada

I thought that this liberal party was all about fighting climate change? How can the liberal party fight climate change when they keep bringing in approx. 500,000 new legal and illegal immigrants into Canada every year?

There will be more damage to the environment because of the need to build more new homes for all those new immigrants by cutting down more trees by the tens of thousands, and not to forget that there will be more roads that need to be built. There will be tens of thousands, if not more, of new vehicles on the road dosing out more carbon emissions into the air. The infrastructure in Canada will be under attack every day. 

S, just where is the logic and common sense to all of this? Well, there is no common sense and no logic being utilized in Canada anymore. You see, it was never about the environment and climate crisis change at all. It was all just plain bullshit, just like covid. If the liberal party were serious about the climate crisis, then the last thing that they would be wanting to do is bring in more new immigrants by the hundreds of thousands every year. 

And my personal conspiracy belief is that this is a part of the WEF globalists plan, with the help of WEF students Trudeau and Freeland, to eliminate as many white folk as they can here in Canada. I can believe it. Can you?  

[herbie]

[August1991]

On 3/23/2024 at 12:58 PM, CdnFox said:

No we didn't. You posted that before and i've posted information that says that's not accurate - i asked you then for your source.. Do you have one now?

Source? The federal census of 1891, 1901, 1911 and 1921.

1. Between 1890-1920, Canada received more immigrants than it has ever received in its history - both in absolute terms and in relative terms.

2. Australia is a large island. Immigrants to Canada frequently move south.

3. The larger question is how to bring humans into the modern world.  

 

[August1991]

Between 1880 and 1920, many foreigners were arriving in Canada.

But many Quebecers were moving south.

=====

Canada used to be the US immigration system. Australia is different.

[August1991]

On 3/22/2024 at 1:51 PM, CdnFox said:

....

It's like justin WANTS to destroy the liberal party AND canada

In 1896, Wilfrid Laurier was the sole francophone at the cabinet table.

But there was also Clifford Sifton. 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, August1991 said:

Source? The federal census of 1891, 1901, 1911 and 1921.

 

that doesn't seem accurate. You appear to be in error. Post a link that shows what you're looking at and we'll go from there.

 

1 hour ago, August1991 said:

Between 1880 and 1920, many foreigners were arriving in Canada.

But many Quebecers were moving south.

=====

Canada used to be the US immigration system. Australia is different.

Again - not really useful.

1 hour ago, August1991 said:

In 1896, Wilfrid Laurier was the sole francophone at the cabinet table.

But there was also Clifford Sifton. 

Yes, we know you're an 1diot, there's no need to hammer it home.

[August1991]

Canada, North America, is a large place.

Of course, federal Canada would be a different place if Clifford Sifton had never been a minister.

====

In the 1800s, while Catholic French women were having numerous children, kids looking for a better place to live, Sifton forbid them to live in western Canada.

In the US New England nowadays, western Ontario, so many Quebec family names. 

Edited March 27 by August1991

[CdnFox]

16 minutes ago, August1991 said:

Canada, North America, is a large place.

Of course, federal Canada would be a different place if Clifford Sifton had never been a minister.

====

In the 1800s, while Catholic French women were having numerous children, kids looking for a better place to live, Sifton forbid them to live in western Canada.

In the US New England nowadays, western Ontario, so many Quebec family names. 

Cool story kid.

[August1991]

On 3/27/2024 at 12:33 AM, CdnFox said:

Cool story kid.

Successful (sustainable) societies do not have a chip on the shoulder.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, August1991 said:

Successful (sustainable) societies do not have a chip on the shoulder.

Intelligent sane people do not make rambling nonsense posts as you do .

So there you go.