Jump to content

Do the House Republicans set the prestige of the country above the personal loyalty to the cult?


Recommended Posts

The question is very simple now, binary: Yes; or No.

The Ukraine funding question has nothing to do with charity. In 1994 Ukraine gave up up to 1,700 nuclear warheads, the third largest nuclear arsenal at the time, for the guarantees of security and territorial integrity, signed, among the others, by the President of the United States.

This is not just another procedural deadline game. The prestige and credibility, the word of the United States of America is what the pets of the lying buffoon set off to play with these days. If it's failed on a matter of this magnitude, who will ever consider trusting it for any one thing that matters? Who would ever want to give up their nukes? There's no chance in hell itself they are so ignorant or dumb to not know. So: lying. Playing disgusting games. On a cue from the buffoon, whose else.

The pets are clearly past understanding the impact and responsibility of the matters they are playing with, all they have left is a direct feed to the throat of their Idol. But they want and work to have the stain spread over the entire party. The collective guilt that will tie it together under the Idol with no possibility of a return to normality: honesty; integrity; self-respect; and respect of the posterity. This has already happened in history. There's nothing to be naive or ignorant about here.

Will the Republicans, how many? stand for the word and prestige of their country over worshiping a cult Idol, as they pledged to the country in the oath? There's nothing to talk about or wait for: in the coming days we will see it. Nothing can be changed, explained, moved away any more by just words. And the judgement will go straight into the history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, myata said:

The question is very simple now, binary: Yes; or No.

The Ukraine funding question has nothing to do with charity. In 1994 Ukraine gave up up to 1,700 nuclear warheads, the third largest nuclear arsenal at the time, for the guarantees of security and territorial integrity, signed, among the others, by the President of the United States.

This is not just another procedural deadline game. The prestige and credibility, the word of the United States of America is what the pets of the lying buffoon set off to play with these days. If it's failed on a matter of this magnitude, who will ever consider trusting it for any one thing that matters? Who would ever want to give up their nukes? There's no chance in hell itself they are so ignorant or dumb to not know. So: lying. Playing disgusting games. On a cue from the buffoon, whose else.

The pets are clearly past understanding the impact and responsibility of the matters they are playing with, all they have left is a direct feed to the throat of their Idol. But they want and work to have the stain spread over the entire party. The collective guilt that will tie it together under the Idol with no possibility of a return to normality: honesty; integrity; self-respect; and respect of the posterity. This has already happened in history. There's nothing to be naive or ignorant about here.

Will the Republicans, how many? stand for the word and prestige of their country over worshiping a cult Idol, as they pledged to the country in the oath? There's nothing to talk about or wait for: in the coming days we will see it. Nothing can be changed, explained, moved away any more by just words. And the judgement will go straight into the history.

Uh-uh; the question is, "Do the house Republicans set the woke democrat cult agenda above the personal loyalty to the country and its constitution? 

The answer, of course, is "No". ;)

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deluge said:

Uh-uh; the question is, "Do the house Republicans set the woke democrat cult agenda above the personal loyalty to the country and its constitution? 

The answer, of course, is "No". ;)

 

What the F are you talking about?  The United States has been fully committed to the military defense of Western Europe since 1941.  Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, Bush, and Bush were all committed to the defense of Europe.  
 

MAGA means “Piece of Shlt Traitor.” 
MAGA wants Russia to conquer Europe and wants fascists to suspend elections in America and instate Trump for life, and his ldiot children after that.  MAGA is evil and stupidity wrapped all together. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Rebound said:

What the F are you talking about?  The United States has been fully committed to the military defense of Western Europe since 1941.  Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, Bush, and Bush were all committed to the defense of Europe.  
 

MAGA means “Piece of Shlt Traitor.” 
MAGA wants Russia to conquer Europe and wants fascists to suspend elections in America and instate Trump for life, and his ldiot children after that.  MAGA is evil and stupidity wrapped all together. 

News flash Tweenkie. Ukraine is NOT in Western Europe.

Quote

Eastern Europe is, as the name says, the eastern part of Europe. According to the United Nations definition, countries within Eastern Europe are Belarus, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Ukraine and the western part of the Russian Federation

Swing...an' a miss.

Oh and BTW...you happen to be a traitor. You're a liar too.

Make America Great Again.

But ya...you be you...

image.thumb.jpeg.d39d8189fe9e014803c47db704eeace4.jpeg

Edited by Nationalist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Uh-uh; the question is, "Do the house Republicans set the woke democrat cult agenda above the personal loyalty to the country and its constitutio MAGA CULT?

The answer, of course, is "No". ;)

 

ftfy....

Apparently you don't know that der leader Trump had called to TERMINATING the Constitution. 🤮

Trump's Call for 'Termination' of Constitution Draws Rebukes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, robosmith said:

ftfy....

Apparently you don't know that der leader Trump had called to TERMINATING the Constitution. 🤮

Trump's Call for 'Termination' of Constitution Draws Rebukes

You just can't resist changing people's posts and raping their thoughts, can you.

Tsk...I hope your kids learn "honour" somewhere. You certainly have none to impart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Rebound said:

What the F are you talking about?  The United States has been fully committed to the military defense of Western Europe since 1941.  Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, Bush, and Bush were all committed to the defense of Europe.  
 

MAGA means “Piece of Shlt Traitor.” 
MAGA wants Russia to conquer Europe and wants fascists to suspend elections in America and instate Trump for life, and his ldiot children after that.  MAGA is evil and stupidity wrapped all together. 

I'm sorry, leftoid, but I'm not interested in proxy wars - Ukraine has had more than enough help. If you retards really believed Putin was trying to overrun Ukraine and the rest of the planet, your illegitimate president would've lead the charge to go full scale on him.

There's too much trouble and suffering within our own country to get wrapped up in that patty cake bullsh*t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

ftfy....

Apparently you don't know that der leader Trump had called to TERMINATING the Constitution. 🤮

Trump's Call for 'Termination' of Constitution Draws Rebukes

Apparently YOU don't understand that the NYT is a left-wing rag. 

Of course Trump never called for the termination of the Constitution. If there IS any call for the termination of the Constitution it's coming from YOUR side of the political aisle - look no further than the 2nd Amendment to confirm that. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

News flash Tweenkie. Ukraine is NOT in Western Europe.

Swing...an' a miss.

Oh and BTW...you happen to be a traitor. You're a liar too.

Make America Great Again.

But ya...you be you...

 

Such a pathetic excuse. 

America signed treaties to guarantee Ukrainian autonomy in the wake of their agreement to dismantle their nuclear weapons stockpile. A ratified US treaty is “the supreme law of the land” in the United States. Further, the fall of Ukraine is a stepping stone to further Russian expansion. He won’t stop with Ukraine. 

Russia also signed treaties agreeing to Ukrainian sovereignty.  Russia is lead by an evil man who jails his political rivals and reporters. There is no freedom in Russia as we know it. Post the wrong thing on the Internet and you go to prison. You wouldn’t last two minutes over there. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

You just can't resist changing people's posts and raping their thoughts, can you.

Tsk...I hope your kids learn "honour" somewhere. You certainly have none to impart.

IF you weren't so old, out of touch, and Canadian, you would know that "ftfy..." is time honored Internet forum tradition.

Certainly in the US. Of course, as usual, I don't expect that FACT will penetrate your cognitive dissonance. LMAO

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Apparently YOU don't understand that the NYT is a left-wing rag. 

What you don't understand is that there are MANY OTHER SOURCES saying the SAME THING. Duh

 

7 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Of course Trump never called for the termination of the Constitution. If there IS any call for the termination of the Constitution it's coming from YOUR side of the political aisle - look no further than the 2nd Amendment to confirm that. ;)

Of course, as usual, you have NOTHING to back ^this up. 🤮

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, robosmith said:

What you don't understand is that there are MANY OTHER SOURCES saying the SAME THING. Duh

Of course, as usual, you have NOTHING to back ^this up. 🤮

He's not trying to terminate it, you woketard, he wants clarification on it, and I agree. 

Now, as far as you degenerates go, "termination" of the Constitution would be a very desirable option. Oh sure, you'll never come right out and admit that in public, but I'm sure most of you communists are quietly wishing for it. At the very least you want to "re-envision it" which basically means tear the current one up and spray paint some bullshit left-wing declaration on a new York inner city wall. 

Let's see check out Salon:

https://www.salon.com/2020/12/10/the-us-constitution-is-hopelessly-outdated-its-time-to-re-envision-it/

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brain-dead people, brain dead muzak: single note, direct feed to the throat of the lying buffoon. Four billion years of evolution wasted because they discovered that they can turn their brains off in a flash. Wow.

Edited by myata
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Deluge said:

He's not trying to terminate it, you woketard, he wants clarification on it, and I agree. 

Now, as far as you degenerates go, "termination" of the Constitution would be a very desirable option. Oh sure, you'll never come right out and admit that in public, but I'm sure most of you communists are quietly wishing for it. At the very least you want to "re-envision it" which basically means tear the current one up and spray paint some bullshit left-wing declaration on a new York inner city wall. 

Let's see check out Salon:

https://www.salon.com/2020/12/10/the-us-constitution-is-hopelessly-outdated-its-time-to-re-envision-it/

 

He SAID "TERMINATE." Read the "Truth." Duh 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Apparently YOU don't understand that the NYT is a left-wing rag. 

Of course Trump never called for the termination of the Constitution. If there IS any call for the termination of the Constitution it's coming from YOUR side of the political aisle - look no further than the 2nd Amendment to confirm that. ;)

The New York Times is the best newspaper in the world. 

You only think it’s “left wing” because your second grade reading level can’t understand properly written English.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

Such a pathetic excuse. 

America signed treaties to guarantee Ukrainian autonomy in the wake of their agreement to dismantle their nuclear weapons stockpile. A ratified US treaty is “the supreme law of the land” in the United States. Further, the fall of Ukraine is a stepping stone to further Russian expansion. He won’t stop with Ukraine. 

Russia also signed treaties agreeing to Ukrainian sovereignty.  Russia is lead by an evil man who jails his political rivals and reporters. There is no freedom in Russia as we know it. Post the wrong thing on the Internet and you go to prison. You wouldn’t last two minutes over there. 

"AHHH! WE ALL GONNA DIIIEEE!"

I see no evidence that Putin will go after NATO nations. None. Zero. Nada.

You can squeak away all you like but...its simply just the lies of scared limp noodles. And Russia has as much right to have the leader they want as any other country.

It must really be painful to be scared and have to lie daily. Meh...Libbies...

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

IF you weren't so old, out of touch, and Canadian, you would know that "ftfy..." is time honored Internet forum tradition.

Certainly in the US. Of course, as usual, I don't expect that FACT will penetrate your cognitive dissonance. LMAO

You have no honour.!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Johnson: "without the border the assistance bill will not be voted"

The buffoon's pet holds the nation for brainless !diots, just like his owner. Since November he blocked it insisted on tying the border to the aid to the freedom countries that has no reasonable, or any logical connection.

Then on the Idol's cue, the agreed solution was sunk. And now he wants to start it all over again?

The Republicans: this one is on you. You nourished and played with the cult; and now it is ready to swallow you whole. There will be nothing left: no independent thought; no principles; ideals; self-respect; only who didn't cheer loud enough. You were laughing at North Korea? The history laughs last.

The stain will go on the whole party. The stink and shame will last for generations. There will be no reasons and excuses this time.

Let's see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

"AHHH! WE ALL GONNA DIIIEEE!"

I see no evidence that Putin will go after NATO nations. None. Zero. Nada.

You can squeak away all you like but...its simply just the lies of scared limp noodles. And Russia has as much right to have the leader they want as any other country.

It must really be painful to be scared and have to lie daily. Meh...Libbies...

You have no honour.!

No evidence?  
You have no evidence that Putin will not invade more countries. Zero. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Rebound said:

No evidence?  
You have no evidence that Putin will not invade more countries. Zero. 

LOL...now your being ridiculous.

You have no evidence that Brandon won't invade Columbia. Zero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

LOL...now your being ridiculous.

You have no evidence that Brandon won't invade Columbia. Zero.

Sure there is evidence, you just won't acknowledge it.

The FACT is Joe got us OUT of Afghanistan. That is STRONG EVIDENCE that there would have to be AMPLE justification for Joe to order ANY invasion.

Meanwhile Putin's recent justification for invading Ukraine is citing Hitler's justification for invading Poland as told to your HERO Tucker Carlson.

Did you hear it? According to Putin, Hitler justified invading Poland because they stopped COOPERATING.

Putin cited the same justification for invading Ukraine. They were cooperating and then they STOPPED. AKA Putin's puppet Yanukovych was deposed (actually just fled the country).

In REALITY, it is you who is being ridiculously out of touch with REALITY.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Sure there is evidence, you just won't acknowledge it.

The FACT is Joe got us OUT of Afghanistan. That is STRONG EVIDENCE that there would have to be AMPLE justification for Joe to order ANY invasion.

Meanwhile Putin's recent justification for invading Ukraine is citing Hitler's justification for invading Poland as told to your HERO Tucker Carlson.

Did you hear it? According to Putin, Hitler justified invading Poland because they stopped COOPERATING.

Putin cited the same justification for invading Ukraine. They were cooperating and then they STOPPED. AKA Putin's puppet Yanukovych was deposed (actually just fled the country).

In REALITY, it is you who is being ridiculously out of touch with REALITY.

 

Dumb Diddy dumb Diddy dumb dumb dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cults always operate the same way: they begin with great (general) words; and in the end they come down to, always, take from you everything, your entire former self for unquestionable loyalty, don't even look, never to think again.

That line is now; you can stand up for what is right, and moreover for your dignity, integrity, the principles, self; or you can submit and cower. No middle ground, and nothing to be hidden: from the country; the world and the generations.

Yes, you knew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cult conditioning, live: the buffoon claims from one part of the mouth that he will support Ukraine "better than Biden" and from the other, blocks the lifeline assistance, not a charity: an obligation under the security guarantees given for relinquishing the third largest arsenal of nukes on the planet.

This is no coincidence. This is how the cults work, what they do and it will swallow you whole. Nothing will be left, nothing but a sad and disdainful shadow no surprises because this is playing out exactly as it has already happened in history.

No one is at fault. You knew exactly the kind of shame and sh*t you were stepping into: and dragging your formerly proud party, and the country. The choice is due now, and there will be no way to avoid it. The future and history are watching: you.

Edited by myata
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,752
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Dorai
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Venandi earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • CrazyCanuck89 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • DUI_Offender went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...