165 Bite-Marks on Biden's Pillow Now, 3 US Soldiers Killed

[WestCanMan]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/3-american-troops-killed-25-injured-attack-jordan-base-near-syria-border

US forces have been reeling since day 1 of the Biden administration.

First Russian troops started gathering on the Ukrainian border on day 1 of his presidency, then Americans abandoned their allies and scrambled to get out of Afghanistan in complete disarray (13 US solders were killed by terrorists, some of whom were let out of Bagram prison by Biden, and Biden's only response was to drone-strike a family), now US soldiers on the ground in the ME are the subject of daily attacks from Iranian-based/funded militias: there have been 165 since Oct 7th.

Now what?

Should the US retaliate, or should they just sit back and wait it out, hoping for a regime change in the US so that their military can regain some hope?

[WestCanMan]

When I said "daily attacks" above I wasn't exaggerating, it's quite the opposite.

There were 165 attacks in only 115 days: that's actually 1.4 attacks daily.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

When I said "daily attacks" above I wasn't exaggerating, it's quite the opposite.

There were 165 attacks in only 115 days: that's actually 1.4 attacks daily.

Show us where you complained about US troop deaths under Trump or just admit YOUR PARTISAN HACKERY.

Quote

But how do Trump's claims stand up in terms of safeguarding U.S. troops?

Some 65 American service members died in combat while serving Trump during his time in the White House office from January 2017 to January 2021. There were fatalities every year of his presidency, according to the "hostile action" records compiled by the Defense Casualty Analysis System (DCAS), which is maintained by a government defense agency.

War is a tragic business and we should all be grateful there are citizens willing to put their lives on the line for our freedom.

 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/3-american-troops-killed-25-injured-attack-jordan-base-near-syria-border

US forces have been reeling since day 1 of the Biden administration.

First Russian troops started gathering on the Ukrainian border on day 1 of his presidency, then Americans abandoned their allies and scrambled to get out of Afghanistan in complete disarray (13 US solders were killed by terrorists, some of whom were let out of Bagram prison by Biden, and Biden's only response was to drone-strike a family), now US soldiers on the ground in the ME are the subject of daily attacks from Iranian-based/funded militias: there have been 165 since Oct 7th.

Now what?

Should the US retaliate, or should they just sit back and wait it out, hoping for a regime change in the US so that their military can regain some hope?

Honestly - i think they'd be better off to wait to see if trump gets in and let him handle it - he's hardly a military expert but he'd be better than biden and because you NEVER know what he'll do his enemies would be far more cautious,

[WestCanMan]

21 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Honestly - i think they'd be better off to wait to see if trump gets in and let him handle it - he's hardly a military expert but he'd be better than biden and because you NEVER know what he'll do his enemies would be far more cautious,

Even Nikki Haley, or (God forbid) Gavin Newsom would be a vast improvement. 

They don't even have to be any better than Biden, they just need to have the appearance of being better. Biden's weakness and stupidity are visible from outer space, and America's enemies know exactly what they'll get.

At the very least there will be a brief period of learning about the next leader before America's enemies initiate the next phase of "Operation Dismantle America". Ideally Haley or Newsom are at least 'average' as far as US presidents go.

[Rebound]

22 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/3-american-troops-killed-25-injured-attack-jordan-base-near-syria-border

US forces have been reeling since day 1 of the Biden administration.

First Russian troops started gathering on the Ukrainian border on day 1 of his presidency, then Americans abandoned their allies and scrambled to get out of Afghanistan in complete disarray (13 US solders were killed by terrorists, some of whom were let out of Bagram prison by Biden, and Biden's only response was to drone-strike a family), now US soldiers on the ground in the ME are the subject of daily attacks from Iranian-based/funded militias: there have been 165 since Oct 7th.

Now what?

Should the US retaliate, or should they just sit back and wait it out, hoping for a regime change in the US so that their military can regain some hope?

You people are so full of shlt. Sorry… no other words for it. 

Sixty-five American soldiers died in combat during the Trump Administration. So far, 16 service members died in combat under Biden. So Trump’s record is far worse. Where’s your outrage?

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-biden-troops-killed-soldier-deaths-record-1864956#:~:text=Some 65 American service members,January 2017 to January 2021.

Edited January 31, 2024 by Rebound

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

You people are so full of shlt. Sorry… no other words for it. 

Sixty-five American soldiers died in combat during the Trump Administration. So far, 16 service members died in combat under Biden. So Trump’s record is far worse. Where’s your outrage?

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-biden-troops-killed-soldier-deaths-record-1864956#:~:text=Some 65 American service members,January 2017 to January 2021.

🤣 I saw Jessica Tarlov pimping that BS hard yesterday. It's funny how quickly the memo gets out: "EVERYONE SWITCH THE TOPIC TO THIS!"

Buddy, Trump inherited two wars: islamic state and Afghanistan. When he was elected, it was inevitable that no small number of servicemen were going to die. US forces were even attacked by a large group of Russian mercenaries while they were fighting islamic state. Those guys all died.

For Trump to come out on the other end of a 4-yr term that started with two wars and only lose 65 servicemen was an incredible achievement, and it's revolting that you're trying to use those dead bodies as props for the Biden campaign. 

At best you're a troll, so you've got no lofty standards to maintain, but you sunk to a new low there, maggot.  

Biden inherited peace and strength. War, chaos and inflation ensued. 

This isn't about the fact that 3 servicemen died, it's about the fact that 3 servicemen died because America's enemies are having a hay-day while the US remains rudderless. 

The 65 servicemen who died while Trump was president didn't die because of Trump's fecklessness and stupidity. 

Edited January 31, 2024 by WestCanMan

[Rebound]

4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

🤣 I saw Jessica Tarlov pimping that BS hard yesterday. It's funny how quickly the memo gets out: "EVERYONE SWITCH THE TOPIC TO THIS!"

Buddy, Trump inherited two wars: islamic state and Afghanistan. When he was elected, it was inevitable that no small number of servicemen were going to die. US forces were even attacked by a large group of Russian mercenaries while they were fighting islamic state. Those guys all died.

For Trump to come out on the other end of a 4-yr term that started with two wars and only lose 65 servicemen was an incredible achievement, and it's revolting that you're trying to use those dead bodies as props for the Biden campaign. 

At best you're a troll, so you've got no lofty standards to maintain, but you sunk to a new low there, maggot.  

Biden inherited peace and strength. War, chaos and inflation ensued. 

This isn't about the fact that 3 servicemen died, it's about the fact that 3 servicemen died because America's enemies are having a hay-day while the US remains rudderless. 

The 65 servicemen who died while Trump was president didn't die because of Trump's fecklessness and stupidity. 

You’re the one bringing up the body count.

If we don’t include service members killed in Afghanistan, Biden still fares better. If you’ll recall (and you probably won’t), Trump lost four service members in Sudan within a month of taking office.  Yeah, Sudan. You probably can’t find it on a map and heaven knows what our soldiers were doing there.

Edited January 31, 2024 by Rebound

[WestCanMan]

Just now, Rebound said:

You’re the one bringing up the body count.

No, I'm bringing up the "only died because the president was a feckless dolt" body count. 

[Hodad]

11 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

🤣 I saw Jessica Tarlov pimping that BS hard yesterday. It's funny how quickly the memo gets out: "EVERYONE SWITCH THE TOPIC TO THIS!"

Buddy, Trump inherited two wars: islamic state and Afghanistan. When he was elected, it was inevitable that no small number of servicemen were going to die. US forces were even attacked by a large group of Russian mercenaries while they were fighting islamic state. Those guys all died.

For Trump to come out on the other end of a 4-yr term that started with two wars and only lose 65 servicemen was an incredible achievement, and it's revolting that you're trying to use those dead bodies as props for the Biden campaign. 

At best you're a troll, so you've got no lofty standards to maintain, but you sunk to a new low there, maggot.  

Biden inherited peace and strength. War, chaos and inflation ensued. 

This isn't about the fact that 3 servicemen died, it's about the fact that 3 servicemen died because America's enemies are having a hay-day while the US remains rudderless. 

The 65 servicemen who died while Trump was president didn't die because of Trump's fecklessness and stupidity. 

Uses dead soldiers as a political talking point. Pretends to be super disgusted when a reply refers to dead soldiers in a way that debunks the talking point. 

Cynical and disgusting. Typical and expected. 

[robosmith]

23 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

🤣 I saw Jessica Tarlov pimping that BS hard yesterday. It's funny how quickly the memo gets out: "EVERYONE SWITCH THE TOPIC TO THIS!"

Buddy, Trump inherited two wars: islamic state and Afghanistan. When he was elected, it was inevitable that no small number of servicemen were going to die. US forces were even attacked by a large group of Russian mercenaries while they were fighting islamic state. Those guys all died.

For Trump to come out on the other end of a 4-yr term that started with two wars and only lose 65 servicemen was an incredible achievement, and it's revolting that you're trying to use those dead bodies as props for the Biden campaign. 

At best you're a troll, so you've got no lofty standards to maintain, but you sunk to a new low there, maggot.  

Biden inherited peace and strength. War, chaos and inflation ensued. 

This isn't about the fact that 3 servicemen died, it's about the fact that 3 servicemen died because America's enemies are having a hay-day while the US remains rudderless. 

The 65 servicemen who died while Trump was president didn't die because of Trump's fecklessness and stupidity. 

By ^YOUR STANDARD, you can wipe the 13 soldiers killed in Afghanistan from Biden's tally, because HE inherited that war, too.

Entirely due to Trump's FAILURE to withdraw the US from Afghanistan AFTER negotiating our surrender to the Taliban.

[WestCanMan]

Just keep proving how stupid you are Hodad, robo. 

I don't even need to reply to those posts. Literally everyone here knows what's up. 

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Just keep proving how stupid you are Hodad, robo. 

I don't even need to reply to those posts. Literally everyone here knows what's up. 

Thanks for your confirmation of the FACTS. 

[Legato]

20 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Uses dead soldiers as a political talking point. Pretends to be super disgusted when a reply refers to dead soldiers in a way that debunks the talking point. 

Cynical and disgusting. Typical and expected. 

Not really. The talking point is the frailty of the inept in the Biden administration. When the secretary of defense is immobilized and no one knew for a week. Along with Biden's lack of action with over 150 attacks on American baes. 

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, Legato said:

Not really. The talking point is the frailty of the inept in the Biden administration. When the secretary of defense is immobilized and no one knew for a week. Along with Biden's lack of action with over 150 attacks on American baes. 

Just cause you're completely IGNORANT does not mean "Biden's lack of action." Duh

[Hodad]

2 hours ago, Legato said:

Not really. The talking point is the frailty of the inept in the Biden administration. When the secretary of defense is immobilized and no one knew for a week. Along with Biden's lack of action with over 150 attacks on American baes. 

Let's get real, there's not really a "point" other than "anything Biden does (or doesn't do) is wrong). 
 

The MAGA contingent will, in one post flame blame Biden for starting "wars" that we're not even engaged in, in another post call him a "warmonger" and in yet another post complain that Biden isn't prosecuting a new, expanded war in the ME. 

There's not really any logic to it nor a desired policy outcome. And their best theory of geopolitics is that Trump is better because he's so erratic and unpredictable that no one knows what he will do.🙄

Edited January 31, 2024 by Hodad

[WestCanMan]

54 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Uses dead soldiers as a political talking point. Pretends to be super disgusted when a reply refers to dead soldiers in a way that debunks the talking point. 

Cynical and disgusting. Typical and expected. 

It's the "only died because the president was a feckless dolt" body count. 

Don't you think it's important to notice when the president is getting people killed?

33 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for your confirmation of the FACTS. 

Try to stay on the topic of the "only died because the president was a feckless dolt" body count. 

Edited January 31, 2024 by WestCanMan

[Hodad]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

It's the "only died because the president was a feckless dolt" body count. 

It's the Don't you think it's important to notice when the president is getting people killed?

No, I rather think you're the feckless character in this story. Because if/when Biden escalates this conflict and soldiers inevitably die you'll blame him for those deaths as well. Don't deny it. If Biden had signed off on one of the counterstrike missions that are surely on his table and it went "Blackhawk Down" you'd be the first to blame Biden for that. Because blaming Biden is what you actually care about.

You don't care a whit about dead American soldiers or their cynical use as political props. You have regularly parroted Trump's lie about no soldiers being killed during the last 18-ish months of his administration. You're totally cool with covering up those bodies with lies and using those soldiers as political props. 

[WestCanMan]

14 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Let's get real, there's not really a "point" other than "anything Biden does (or doesn't do) is wrong). 

If you can't even notice Biden's most blatant flaws, and you're just going to whine when other people point them out, maybe just go to a forum about football or something that you understand.

We're not here to babysit you. 

Quote

The MAGA contingent will, in one post flame blame Biden for starting "wars" that we're not even engaged in, in another post call him a "warmonger" and in yet another post complain that Biden isn't persecuting a new, expanded war in the ME. 

What you're saying just amounts to: "these things are too complicated and they hurt your feelings."

So move on...

Quote

There's not really any logic to it nor a desired policy outcome. And their best theory of geopolitics is that Trump is better because he's so erratic and unpredictable that no one knows what he will do.🙄

Trump is better because.... his outcomes are always better. 

It's not rocket science. 

You don't like Trump's methods, but the outcome was always success.

You love Biden's methods, but the outcome is always failure. 

This is a just case of your lack of foresight aligning with his. Look at the border... Biden's policies were an abject failure, but you loved them from the start. Now he's building walls lol. 

Edited January 31, 2024 by WestCanMan

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

You’re the one bringing up the body count.

If we don’t include service members killed in Afghanistan, Biden still fares better. If you’ll recall (and you probably won’t), Trump lost four service members in Sudan within a month of taking office.  Yeah, Sudan. You probably can’t find it on a map and heaven knows what our soldiers were doing there.

The body count for wars he didn't start don't really belong to him.

[Legato]

25 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Let's get real, there's not really a "point" other than "anything Biden does (or doesn't do) is wrong). 
 

The MAGA contingent will, in one post flame blame Biden for starting "wars" that we're not even engaged in, in another post call him a "warmonger" and in yet another post complain that Biden isn't persecuting a new, expanded war in the ME. 

There's not really any logic to it nor a desired policy outcome. And their best theory of geopolitics is that Trump is better because he's so erratic and unpredictable that no one knows what he will do.🙄

The reality is exactly what I posted. Spin it as you will, it does not alters the facts.

[Rebound]

52 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

The body count for wars he didn't start don't really belong to him.

But more service members died under Trump than under Biden, even after subtracting American service members killed in Afghanistan while Trump was President and NOT making the same deduction on Biden’s part.  
 

So your measurement of a President’s quality shows that Joe Biden is a better Commander in Chief.   
 

Don’t you get tired of being so wrong all the time? 

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, Rebound said:

But more service members died under Trump than under Biden, even after subtracting American service members killed in Afghanistan while Trump was President and NOT making the same deduction on Biden’s part.  
 

The service men who died in Afghanistan for a war trump inhereted can't realy be counted against him unless you can show how is actions or inactions contributed to that. That was all i said.

Quote

So your measurement of a President’s quality shows that Joe Biden is a better Commander in Chief.   

No - i've never made that claim or any claim similar. At all.  I've never even heard of that being used as a measure. It really doesn't make sense to me. But it was worth commenting on your one point that suggested that trump hold the bag for  a war he inherited and all i said was that you can't really dump that body count on him.
 

Quote

Don’t you get tired of being so wrong all the time? 

LOL - i get mildly exhausted by YOU being wrong all the time   Nice try twinkie but what i said was correct. All the rest of your crap was stuff you pretended i said which i never did. 

[WestCanMan]

24 minutes ago, Rebound said:

But more service members died under Trump than under Biden, even after subtracting American service members killed in Afghanistan while Trump was President and NOT making the same deduction on Biden’s part.  
 

So your measurement of a President’s quality shows that Joe Biden is a better Commander in Chief.   
 

Don’t you get tired of being so wrong all the time? 

Do you have an example of troops being killed due to Trump's incompetence?

I know of 16 servicemen killed directly because of Biden's incompetence.

When Biden let terrorists out of the Bagram prison, they promptly killed 13 servicemen. 

When Biden allowed Iranian-backed militias to attack US bases 164 times with no reprisals, they attempted a 165th attack, successfully killing 3. 

[robosmith]

47 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Do you have an example of troops being killed due to Trump's incompetence?

Yeah, the total SINCE he negotiated our surrender in Afghanistan to the Taliban without the Afghan government's involvement.

47 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I know of 16 servicemen killed directly because of Biden's incompetence. 

You "know" crap. Do you even have experience in the military?

The 13 were killed by ISIS. The 3 were killed by Iranian proxies.

47 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

When Biden let terrorists out of the Bagram prison, they promptly killed 13 servicemen. 

Biden never set foot in the Bagram prison. Your imagination is playing tricks on your mind.

47 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

When Biden allowed Iranian-backed militias to attack US bases 164 times with no reprisals, they attempted a 165th attack, successfully killing 3. 

Stop LYING. There were numerous reprisals.