Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Arms companies are as bad as the drug dealers. Congress and the SCOTUS have been their biggest enablers.

Why can't we just leave guns to police states and gangbangers? 

-- The Left

Posted
1 minute ago, Aristides said:

You give them to the gangbangers, that’s why Mexico is suing.

They do? Talk more about that. 

How are we "giving" guns to the gangbangers? Talk about the meetings and the actual transactions. How do they go down? 

 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Deluge said:

They do? Talk more about that. 

How are we "giving" guns to the gangbangers? Talk about the meetings and the actual transactions. How do they go down? 

 

Wait and see at the trial.

You  basically let anyone have a gun. Almost every mass murderer and school shooter got their guns legally.

 

When Covid first hit it was probably easier for an American to buy a gun than toilet paper.

Edited by Aristides
  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Wait and see at the trial.

You  basically let anyone have a gun. Almost every mass murderer and school shooter got their guns legally.

So what? Drunk drivers kill people with their cars all the time. 

The point is, you can't blame inanimate objects for people's wrong behaviors. You ALWAYS go after the people, first - that way you don't f*ck with responsible owners' freedoms. 

Posted (edited)
45 minutes ago, Deluge said:

So what? Drunk drivers kill people with their cars all the time. 

The point is, you can't blame inanimate objects for people's wrong behaviors. You ALWAYS go after the people, first - that way you don't f*ck with responsible owners' freedoms. 

Exactly, so why do you give them to just anyone?

More Americans are killed by firearms every year than by motor vehicles. At least you need to pass a test and get a license to drive a car. It's a privilege, not a right.

Edited by Aristides
Posted

They're not giving guns to gangbangers. They're selllng guns to gangbangers. That's completely different. Communists would give them guns. That makes the gun manufacturers good guys !

Posted
5 minutes ago, Aristides said:

1. Exactly, so why do you give them to just anyone?

2. More Americans are killed by firearms every year than by motor vehicles.

3. At least you need to pass a test and get a license to drive a car. It's a privilege, not a right.

1. Because they paid for it. Now, if you're a dealer that knowingly supplies terrorists & criminals with firearms then that's a different story. 

2. That doesn't change the fact that you woketards ALWAYS go after firearms first. The trigger puller is virtually nonexistent in your stoopid crusades. 

3. Responsible gun ownership is what's most important here, and getting in the way of that is un-American. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Aristides said:

Wait and see at the trial.

You  basically let anyone have a gun. Almost every mass murderer and school shooter got their guns legally.

 

When Covid first hit it was probably easier for an American to buy a gun than toilet paper.

If that's the claim they should sue the us gov't - they're the ones who are responsible for restricting sales of goods and such.

THat argument goes nowhere.  Its dumb.

What the Mexicans are arguing is that us gun makers are deliberately setting things up to skirt the laws with the intent of selling to the bad guys. That's different.

30 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Exactly, so why do you give them to just anyone?

 

Ask the gov't. They're the ones in charge of that. Not the gun makers.

Quote

More Americans are killed by firearms every year than by motor vehicles. At least you need to pass a test and get a license to drive a car. It's a privilege, not a right.

and the vast vast vast majority of that is by criminals who did not get their guns legally.

And it's literally a right.

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, herbie said:

They're not giving guns to gangbangers. They're selllng guns to gangbangers. That's completely different. Communists would give them guns. That makes the gun manufacturers good guys !

 

 

Sad but true for many of the i--ots here.

Makes them no different from drug dealers.

58 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOL no it wont :)  

 

Why not if Mexico wins?  We have the same issues with illegal US guns entering the country.

Edited by Aristides
Posted (edited)
41 minutes ago, Aristides said:

 

 

Why not if Mexico wins?  We have the same issues with illegal US guns entering the country.

No, it's not the same issue at all.  Mexico's claims are being made based on very specific grounds that don't apply here.

You want to demonize gun manufactures for misuse, but that's not ok.  Just like you can't sue car companies successfully because there's drunk drivers. Guns don't inherently cause crime. And the guns here used in crime are almost 100 percent smuggled against the law, or otherwise illegally obtained. The number of criminal shootings by lawful gun owners averages to something like 3 a year.

But in mexico they're alleging that the gun companies are setting things up specifically to allow guns to be sold to the cartels and criminal gangs bypassing the laws and doing so knowingly that this is where they'll end up.

To go back to the car analogy - it's the difference between ford selling a car and someone driving drunk and ford selling a car deliberatly to alcoholics with suspended licenses as a target market :)  

Nobody's making that allegation in canada.

Edited by CdnFox

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted (edited)

Dang.

The lawsuits are gonna come Fast and Furious.

ScreenShot2024-01-24at3_29_39PM.thumb.png.aaeebd1210c4a760ef7a7aa2392b31fb.png

Obama to US SCJ's: "Before we                 uh          come to any                                                        rush                                judgement                                       we uh             need to           think long and hard on                               this."                 

Edited by WestCanMan

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
7 hours ago, Aristides said:

Arms companies are as bad as the drug dealers. Congress and the SCOTUS have been their biggest enablers.

Right up there with these guys. Guns don't kill...

image.jpeg.eb2f55ee4488b20b7c3a3addd27d0449.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
11 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Right up there with these guys. Guns don't kill...

image.jpeg.eb2f55ee4488b20b7c3a3addd27d0449.jpeg

Umm - bill clinton was president in 1994 and organized that. You know - from the people who brought you 'i didn't have sexual relations with that woman".  :)      

 Guns kill people in the same way spoons make people fat.

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Umm - bill clinton was president in 1994 and organized that.

So, WTF has does that have to do with anything?

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
Just now, eyeball said:

So, WTF has does that have to do with anything?

About as much as nicotine has to do with guns :) 

but  you seemed to be referencing people who made false statements.  That would have been the democrats. So just don't let democrats buy guns and we're fine! B)

 

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

but  you seemed to be referencing people who made false statements.

No, I was referencing their enablers. Which includes Democrats too of course.

Edited by eyeball
  • Like 1

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted

 

 

41 minutes ago, eyeball said:

No, I was referencing their enablers. Which includes Democrats too of course.

riiiiiight.....

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
43 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Ya right, the gun lobby owns Democrats as well.

The gun lobby doesn't own anyone. Their political contributions aren't that much at all.

What politicians in the us fear is the gun owners themselves, not the lobby.

But that's neither here nor there as far as things go with mexico

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,025
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Jameslive
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • maro ay earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • maro ay earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Longley earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...