Colorado Supreme Court rules insurrectionist Trump ineligible

[impartialobserver]

probably not going to be all that impactful. Trump was not going to win Colorado 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

ftfy....

Your denial will not change the laws that Trump violated.

Oh look -  the socailist has to change what i said to try to come up with an argyument

Here:

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Sorry  everyone - i knew i was wrong but i'm so upset that trump will probably win the next election that rather than be honest i felt the need to pretend the truth was different so that i could sleep at night.  Please be kind given my mental fragility!

That seems more accurate, seeing as we're putting words in people's mouths now

First time in like a week you work up the courage to actually say something to me and it was this garbage. LOL you contributed more when you were silent  

[Deluge]

On 12/28/2023 at 5:38 PM, robosmith said:

Your cite is not credible until you PROVE it's credible. 

Then by that stupid logic, neither are yours, so that would mean that I beat your brains out strictly with logic and sound reasoning, which would be fine with me. 

Of course, I'm going to keep posting the way I always do because you're an insect and it's fun to stomp on you.

Edited December 30, 2023 by Deluge

[Deluge]

On 12/28/2023 at 7:55 PM, Hodad said:

Also now ineligible and off the ballot in Maine.

Not for long.

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Deluge said:

Then by that stupid logic, neither are yours, so that would mean that I beat your brains out strictly with logic and sound reasoning, which would be fine with me. 

Of course, I'm going to keep posting the way I always do because you're an insect and it's fun to stomp on you.

I cite major news organizations and there is NOTHING MORE CREDIBLE than THAT except for JUDGES on US LAW.

Your conservastupidy cite is no better than a BLOG cause ANYONE can post there. Duh

The FACT that you can't admit that, just completely destroys what little credibility you have left.

[CdnFox]

55 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I cite major news organizations and there is NOTHING MORE CREDIBLE than THAT except for JUDGES on US LAW.

Your conservastupidy cite is no better than a BLOG cause ANYONE can post there. Duh

The FACT that you can't admit that, just completely destroys what little credibility you have left.

None of that is true sadly, you almost never cite your positions and half the time when you do your cite actually proves you're wrong,  and the other half it doesn't say what you thought it did either way - and you frequently dismiss what media sources say if you don't like it.

The only part of the news paper we could associate you with accurately is the funny pages  

[Aristides]

On 12/26/2023 at 8:54 PM, CdnFox said:

LOL - it is not up to the person to prove the source is credible - if a source has been provided and evidence given it would be up to you to prove the source and information is inaccurate.

 

Ya, actually it is. 

[Deluge]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

I cite major news organizations and there is NOTHING MORE CREDIBLE than THAT except for JUDGES on US LAW.

Your conservastupidy cite is no better than a BLOG cause ANYONE can post there. Duh

The FACT that you can't admit that, just completely destroys what little credibility you have left.

You cite major left-wing propaganda organizations and they're the least credible of all. Why do you think so many people don't trust the media anymore? You have to depend on Independent outlets to help you with your research. 

You and your sources are not to be trusted, roboliar....ever. 

[Deluge]

On 12/29/2023 at 9:42 AM, impartialobserver said:

probably not going to be all that impactful. Trump was not going to win Colorado 

Leave it to a left-leaning centrist to make a comment like this. 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

Ya, actually it is. 

No it actually isn't.  I realize that bites badly into the lefts favorite tactic, sea lioning, but if you disagree with a source it is up to YOU to demonstrate why it should not be trusted or is inaccurate.

THe lefties love to play that game -  "Cite".  "Here's the cite." "Not good enough - different cite"  "What's wrong with this one?"  " Doesn't matter - go get me more because i say so and can't refute your point".

It's pathetic.   IF you believe something is wrong or inaccurate it is DEFINITELY up to you to provide evidence to that effect or you're just admitting you were wrong in the first place and can't prove otherwise.

[impartialobserver]

On 12/30/2023 at 8:25 PM, Deluge said:

Leave it to a left-leaning centrist to make a comment like this. 

Its called being realistic.. Give it a try. 

[Deluge]

24 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Its called being realistic.. Give it a try. 

No, it's called a nod of approval to left-wing radicals. 

The day one of these banana courts get the green light to remove candidates they don't like, is the day we wave bye-bye to our election system. 

[impartialobserver]

Just now, Deluge said:

No, it's called a nod of approval to left-wing radicals. 

The day one of these banana courts get the green light to remove candidates they don't like, is the day we wave bye-bye to our election system. 

Simple Question... when did Colorado last have a Republican Presidential candidate win the majority of its votes? On the ballot or not.. he is not going to win Colorado. 

If I was in charge (which I am not), I would keep Trump on the ballot. I have zero respect for him but I say let the voting populace decide.

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Simple Question... when did Colorado last have a Republican Presidential candidate win the majority of its votes?

Are you serious? You're actually suggesting that's a reason to put an end to democracy? "Oh they haven't voted republican in a while so it's fine if we take their choice away?

I thought you were a pretty decent person  - what the hell kind of bullshit nazi crap are you spouting there?

[impartialobserver]

Just now, CdnFox said:

Are you serious? You're actually suggesting that's a reason to put an end to democracy? "Oh they haven't voted republican in a while so it's fine if we take their choice away?

I thought you were a pretty decent person  - what the hell kind of bullshit nazi crap are you spouting there?

Its a statement of how impactful it would be. My guess is that Trump wins and yet does not win Colorado (on the ballot or not). I think that would demonstrate just how silly this is. 

[Deluge]

7 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Simple Question... when did Colorado last have a Republican Presidential candidate win the majority of its votes? On the ballot or not.. he is not going to win Colorado. 

If I was in charge (which I am not), I would keep Trump on the ballot. I have zero respect for him but I say let the voting populace decide.

You answered your own question, so why even bring it up? 

[impartialobserver]

Just now, Deluge said:

You answered your own question, so why even bring it up? 

😄

[robosmith]

On 12/30/2023 at 11:19 PM, Deluge said:

You cite major left-wing propaganda organizations and they're the least credible of all. Why do you think so many people don't trust the media anymore? You have to depend on Independent outlets to help you with your research. 

You and your sources are not to be trusted, roboliar....ever. 

The MAGA CULT doesn't trust news sources cause they believe HUGE LIAR Trump calling it "fake news." Duh

Thanks for providing more EVIDENCE of your membership in the MAGA CULT. LMAO

[robosmith]

53 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Simple Question... when did Colorado last have a Republican Presidential candidate win the majority of its votes? On the ballot or not.. he is not going to win Colorado. 

If I was in charge (which I am not), I would keep Trump on the ballot. I have zero respect for him but I say let the voting populace decide.

Should ANYONE who fails to qualify under the Constitution be allowed on the ballot?

We had an election like that for governor of CA after Gray Davis was recalled. The ballot was a clown car.

[Deluge]

43 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The MAGA CULT doesn't trust news sources cause they believe HUGE LIAR Trump calling it "fake news." Duh

Thanks for providing more EVIDENCE of your membership in the MAGA CULT. LMAO

roboshill wants us to believe that all his radical left-wing sources aren't really radically left. lol

42 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Should ANYONE who fails to qualify under the Constitution be allowed on the ballot?

We had an election like that for governor of CA after Gray Davis was recalled. The ballot was a clown car.

Trump qualifies under the Constitution, so I don't know why your diapers are so heavy. 

Either way, go change, please.

[Rebound]

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

roboshill wants us to believe that all his radical left-wing sources aren't really radically left. lol

Trump qualifies under the Constitution, so I don't know why your diapers are so heavy. 

Either way, go change, please.

Anyone who denies that Trump participated in an insurrection is an enemy of the United States.  You’re probably a Russian or Chinese plant, or you’ve been conned by one.  
 

I saw the Jan 6 attacks live on TV. I know they happened. I know they were doing it to try to keep Trump in power. You and your ilk hate our great Constitutional democracy. 

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, impartialobserver said:

Its a statement of how impactful it would be. My guess is that Trump wins and yet does not win Colorado (on the ballot or not). I think that would demonstrate just how silly this is. 

The impact of removing democracy is severe.

what if we just remove the voting rights of anyone living in a state that hasn't changed who won in 2 elections, would that be ok? Only swing states are allowed to vote anymore.

When you take away people's right to choose who to vote for, you are doing irreprable damage.  It is NOT an ok thing to say 'meh - you weren't using your democracy anyway right?"

You are SEVERELY downplaying the 'effect' of removing democracy from people.  Democracy is important, EVEN IF people keep making the same choice the right and ability to MAKE that choice is a VERY big deal.

39 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Anyone who denies that Trump participated in an insurrection is an enemy of the United States.  

That is a dumb thing to say - and frankly worse than anything trump said.  Anyone who dares question your narrative is an 'enemy of the state'?  Can i get you a nice little set of jackboots and a gas chamber to go with that attitude?

 

[Deluge]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

1. Anyone who denies that Trump participated in an insurrection is an enemy of the United States.  You’re probably a Russian or Chinese plant, or you’ve been conned by one.  
 

2. I saw the Jan 6 attacks live on TV. I know they happened. I know they were doing it to try to keep Trump in power. You and your ilk hate our great Constitutional democracy. 

1. I like your passion for left-wing propaganda, but it's irrelevant to freedom. You really do need to pack your sh*t and move to more wokeness friendly countries like Ukaraine. It's going to get ugly here. 

2. What you "saw" and what actually happened are two different things. You snowflakes really need to come to grips with reality. There's no room for your left-wing bullshit in a free country. 

[robosmith]

20 hours ago, Deluge said:

roboshill wants us to believe that all his radical left-wing sources aren't really radically left. lol

Your cult leader Trump calling ANYTHING fake news ONLY means he wants to keep YOU IGNORANT of the FACTS.

AKA, neither fake NOR "radical left-wing." You've been CONNED.

20 hours ago, Deluge said:

Trump qualifies under the Constitution

The 14th A says he's NOT QUALIFIED, no matter how much you want to ignore inconvenient FACTS cause der leader told you not to believe them.

Edited January 3, 2024 by robosmith

[robosmith]

16 hours ago, Deluge said:

1. I like your passion for left-wing propaganda, but it's irrelevant to freedom. You really do need to pack your sh*t and move to more wokeness friendly countries like Ukaraine. It's going to get ugly here. 

You're already "ugly here." But go out and try to steal another election and see how you like JAIL.

Of course Trump won't be in power to pardon you like he's promised.

One thing you don't understand is that Trump could have pardoned his goons after Jan 6th BUT DID NOT.

16 hours ago, Deluge said:

2. What you "saw" and what actually happened are two different things. You snowflakes really need to come to grips with reality. There's no room for your left-wing bullshit in a free country. 

Pure ^projection. You're describing YOURSELF cause YOU'RE DELUGINAL.