Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Stop splitting hairs, dummy. Why would they create the world's most extensive voter fraud org and then not use it, dummy?

We all know that they cheated in 2020, just some of us (the liars, like you) won't admit to it. The Dems are proven election cheaters and they're by far the biggest liars in the world: you'd have to be a complete ****** to even consider for a second that they didn't cheat. They have the FBI committing crimes for them all the time. 

They did use it, dummy. To prevent voter fraud. The same way a fire department fights fires. 

Produce some evidence of fraud or just STFU. You are incorrigible whiners and liars. It's pathetic.

Posted
2 hours ago, West said:

He had like 3 weeks to examine what Joe Biden called the "most extensive voter fraud organization in history". 

There's a REASON you FAILED to provide ANY EVIDENCE for ^this OPINION.

And it ain't because it's true. Duh

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-voter-fraud-organization-video-gaffe

Quote

Biden may have been referring to his campaign's massive "election protection program," which includes former Attorney General Eric Holder and hundreds of other lawyers in preparation for a legal battle in the event of a contested election.

The former vice president’s campaign told Fox News that over the past several months they have created the largest election protection program in presidential campaign history, involving integrated legal, communications and political strategies for what they anticipate to be an unprecedented election.

He left out the word "prevention," and someone managed to dupe fools like you.

2 hours ago, West said:

I believe Joe when he says he engaged in voter fraud. 

He admitted his guilt

IN FACT, HE DID NOT.

Posted
32 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Except he didn't say he had committed voter fraud

Except he DID say he assembled a voter fraud organization and should've been THOROUGHLY LOOKED INTO. Lawyers should not be faced with threats because they took Biden at his word dumb dumb

Posted

Can anyone explain how it is possible that believing the election was rigged or fraudulent or any other disbelief in the election...is illegal? I don't believe the results of that election. How is that illegal?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
39 minutes ago, Hodad said:

They did use it, dummy. To prevent voter fraud. The same way a fire department fights fires. 

Produce some evidence of fraud or just STFU. You are incorrigible whiners and liars. It's pathetic.

So how did they use their own extensive voter fraud org to prevent election cheating then, dummy? Do you have an example of how they alone took steps to combat voter fraud, and how the things they did weren't just to make it easier to cheat themselves? 

They are bona fide election cheaters. Why do you trust election cheaters to cure election fraud? Isn't that stupid AF? 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
44 minutes ago, robosmith said:

There's a REASON you FAILED to provide ANY EVIDENCE for ^this OPINION.

Does it rhyme with "The FBI has an extensive court-documented history of helping the Dems by lying, running smear campaigns against the Dems' opposition, fabricating & 'solving' their own fake GOP-voter kidnapping plots, banning factual information from social media and committing actual crimes"?

Yes, it does. That's a lot to rhyme with, hey? 

  • Haha 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
25 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Does it rhyme with "The FBI has an extensive court-documented history of helping the Dems by lying, running smear campaigns against the Dems' opposition, fabricating & 'solving' their own fake GOP-voter kidnapping plots, banning factual information from social media and committing actual crimes"?

Yes, it does. That's a lot to rhyme with, hey? 

Trump 101: Blow everything up to cover up the crimes of your leader.  

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
Just now, Rebound said:

Trump 101: Blow everything up to cover up the crimes of your leader.  

Leftard 101: Never acknowledge facts, always deflect and respond with accusations.  

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Dude, leftards have no room to call anyone "easily manipulated". You've been on the 'stooged' end of every major news story of the last ten years.

You guys are so accustomed to defending untenable positions that things like "A 3-year smear campaign based entirely on Dem/FBI lies and crimes is no big deal" just roll off your tongue and you don't even flinch.

FYI the reason that so many people thought there was election fraud is because the Dems have such an extensive history of committing voter fraud. When they're not busy cheating on another election they're pushing ridiculously fraud-friendly election reforms like "no voter ID" and "the mass-mailing of unsolicited ballots with no requirement for signature matching".

"Look mommy, another ballot arrived in the mail. This one's for a 'Mrs. Sampson'. I've never heard of her: what do we do?" 

"That's one more vote for the Bidolt, kid. We've already voted for him fifty times ?. Now get your clothes on - we're gonna take the phone book to a few different polling stations and vote with no ID. Ain't democracy grand? Thank you Nancy Pelosi!"

No, I live in a world of object fact.  
 

Objective Facts:

1) Russian government funded groups illegally hacked the email accounts of Donald Trump’s political opposition. 
2) WikiLeaks collaborated with these Russian groups to release these stolen files.  
3) Rudy Giuliani stated that he knew a release of some of these files was coming imminently, and this then occurred. 
4) Trump relished and delighted in these illegal activities, despite running for the office of President.  And he asked Russia on live television to release more of Hillary Clinton’s stolen emails and that they would be rewarded for doing so.  
 

Those are all facts. Not conspiracy theory. Not distortions. Those things happened.  

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Rebound said:

No, I live in a world of object fact.  
 

Objective Facts:1) Russian government funded groups illegally hacked the email accounts of Donald Trump’s political opposition. 

That's a lie. No one has ever proven they were hacked, Crowstrike's CEO testified to as much under oath.

Assange said the emails were leaked, and Wiki has never been proven wrong in that regard. 

Quote

2) WikiLeaks collaborated with these Russian groups to release these stolen files.  

Wikileaks just released the leaked files, period. It's what they do. No one needed Russia's help to "put files on the internet", dummy. Your grandma can do that.

Quote

3) Rudy Giuliani stated that he knew a release of some of these files was coming imminently, and this then occurred. 

Cite?

Quote

4) Trump relished and delighted in these [1.] illegal activities, despite running for the office of President.  And he [2.] asked Russia on live television to release more of Hillary Clinton’s stolen emails and that [3.] they would be rewarded for doing so.  

1 Not illegal. 

2. It was a joke, stupid.

3. Liar.

Quote

Those are all facts. Not conspiracy theory. Not distortions. Those things happened.  

They are similar to facts, they are rife with lies, distortion is far too delicate of a word to describe them. Those things only 'happened' in your dreams. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

That's a lie. No one has ever proven they were hacked, Crowstrike's CEO testified to as much under oath.

Assange said the emails were leaked, and Wiki has never been proven wrong in that regard. 

Wikileaks just released the leaked files, period. It's what they do. No one needed Russia's help to "put files on the internet", dummy. Your grandma can do that.

Cite?

1 Not illegal. 

2. It was a joke, stupid.

3. Liar.

They are similar to facts, they are rife with lies, distortion is far too delicate of a word to describe them. Those things only 'happened' in your dreams. 

 No. 
Stealing data from someone’s computer is illegal. So let’s stop there because it is clear that you are detached from reality. 
 

If you incentivize someone to steal something, and then they steal it, you are an accessory to the crime.  If two or more people even plan a crime and they don’t commit the crime, it’s still conspiracy.  This isn’t make-believe. That’s the law in the U.S., and Donald Trump broke these laws repeatedly.  

Edited by Rebound

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Can anyone explain how it is possible that believing the election was rigged or fraudulent or any other disbelief in the election...is illegal? I don't believe the results of that election. How is that illegal?

No, nobody can tell you that. It's a strawman of your own invention.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Rebound said:

 No. 
Stealing data from someone’s computer is illegal. So let’s stop there because it is clear that you are detached from reality. 

FTY the data was leaked from a DNC server, and for all you know the person who leaked it had the legal authority to disseminate that data.

Quote

If you incentivize someone to steal something, and then they steal it, you are an accessory to the crime.  

No one incentivized theft, and nothing was stolen...

Quote

If two or more people even plan a crime and they don’t commit the crime, it’s still conspiracy.  This isn’t make-believe. That’s the law in the U.S., and Donald Trump broke these laws repeatedly.  

You're like a drowning man clutching at straws now. Ultra-pathetic. 

In case you've forgotten, what was LEAKED was proof that the Dems are election cheaters. 

You seem really desperate to forget about that...

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, West said:

He had like 3 weeks to examine what Joe Biden called the "most extensive voter fraud organization in history". 

How do you survive being as stupid as you are?

It's amazing.

Edited by CrakHoBarbie
  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Rebound said:

 No. 
Stealing data from someone’s computer is illegal. So let’s stop there because it is clear that you are detached from reality. 
 

If you incentivize someone to steal something, and then they steal it, you are an accessory to the crime.  If two or more people even plan a crime and they don’t commit the crime, it’s still conspiracy.  This isn’t make-believe. That’s the law in the U.S., and Donald Trump broke these laws repeatedly.  

Why are you more concerned about how someone got the info than what the info was ?..

Why I don't take Democrats seriously

Posted
2 hours ago, West said:

Except he DID say he assembled a voter fraud organization and should've been THOROUGHLY LOOKED INTO. Lawyers should not be faced with threats because they took Biden at his word dumb dumb

Oh, my goodness. Great idea. Someone should really check into the 2020 election for voter fraud. ?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

How do you survive being as stupid as you are?

It's amazing.

People are gonna call you crazy if you don't stop talking to yourself in public. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
3 hours ago, West said:

Except he DID say he assembled a voter fraud organization and should've been THOROUGHLY LOOKED INTO. 

If it's necessary to start a 3-yr investigation into Trump because he quipped about Russia digging up Hillary's emails (if the FBI couldn't fid them, why worry if the Ruskies could find them?) then it's definitely necessary to investigate Bidolt's declarative statement. 

  • Like 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
1 hour ago, West said:

Why are you more concerned about how someone got the info than what the info was ?..

Why I don't take Democrats seriously

Hmm… well those thousands and thousands of pages were released, but Trump’s hand-picked “Lock Her Up” attorneys general failed to indict any Democrat for so much as a parking ticket.  

  • Thanks 1

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Hodad said:

No, nobody can tell you that. It's a strawman of your own invention.

Wait...this Geogia thing is happening because Trump refused to accept the election outcome. He asked Georgia officials to recount and such.

The RICO thing is ridiculous. Most of this presupposes they can prove Trump didn't/ doesn't believe there was fraud or illegal votes counted.

I'll let you in on a little semi-secret. I wish Donny hadn't carried on the way he did after the election. His story makes it harder to reintroduce America to common sense. Mostly because his very life is so obscene to you. To all Libbies. I generally find his style funny...and his policies successful. Libbies actually try to convince people that the Trump years were the worst...when the results say the exact opposite. 

I'm sort o' thinking these charges will fail. What remains to be seen is if he actually follows through with another POTUS run.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Can anyone explain how it is possible that believing the election was rigged or fraudulent or any other disbelief in the election...is illegal? I don't believe the results of that election. How is that illegal?

Read the indictment. It is explained clearly there. Duh

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Leftard 101: Never acknowledge facts, always deflect and respond with accusations.  

NOT JUST "accusations;" indictments with gobs of EVIDENCE.

Much of which you would know about if you paid attention to the Jan 6th committee SWORN TESTIMONY by WH insiders.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, West said:

Why are you more concerned about how someone got the info than what the info was ?..

Why I don't take Democrats seriously

Being Canadian you're probably unfamiliar with "the fruit of a poisonous tree." Google it.

45 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

If it's necessary to start a 3-yr investigation into Trump because he quipped about Russia digging up Hillary's emails (if the FBI couldn't fid them, why worry if the Ruskies could find them?) then it's definitely necessary to investigate Bidolt's declarative statement. 

Wrong. The investigation was started long before that event and was based on associations with Russian agents.

Posted
1 minute ago, robosmith said:

Being Canadian you're probably unfamiliar with "the fruit of a poisonous tree." Google it.

Which fruit are you robo-bot?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
20 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Wait...this Geogia thing is happening because Trump refused to accept the election outcome. He asked Georgia officials to recount and such.

The RICO thing is ridiculous. Most of this presupposes they can prove Trump didn't/ doesn't believe there was fraud or illegal votes counted.

I'll let you in on a little semi-secret. I wish Donny hadn't carried on the way he did after the election. His story makes it harder to reintroduce America to common sense. Mostly because his very life is so obscene to you. To all Libbies. I generally find his style funny...and his policies successful. Libbies actually try to convince people that the Trump years were the worst...when the results say the exact opposite. 

I'm sort o' thinking these charges will fail. What remains to be seen is if he actually follows through with another POTUS run.

No, no one is in legal jeopardy for asking for a recount. Read the indictments--or a news article--so you know what the legal issues are. 

  • Thanks 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,024
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    portman123
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...