Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't even think Trump got this much attention running the first time.

God forbid he beats this case. You have just given him free advertising for months.

He literally is living rent free inside your head.

News outlets know this is what sells so they are pushing it, heavily.

Posted
7 hours ago, robosmith said:

Who told you ^this? Thanks for proving ONCE AGAIN you don't understand US LAW.

LOL - i undersatnd it better than you :)  ANd your opinion IS useless without PROOF!!!

 

Quote

ROFMAO - thanks for proving me right :)   LOL wow you screwed that one up :)  

Quote

^More BULLSHIT from you. Biden returned all the documents he had WHEN DISCOVERED, almost all BEFORE "ordered."

They are instructed to turn them in the day they leave office.  Thats WHY he was in such a tizzy to turn them back in the moment they were discovered.

 

Quote

There's plenty of EVIDENCE outlined in the indictment that PROVES Trump knew he had classified documents.

Including several that were squirreled away in Trump's personal desk.

Sure - but anything outside the indictment  is meaningless.  You can't convict on it.

Two things can be true at the same time -  Trump can be guilty of a crime, and Trump could defeat the charges and the DOJ could fail to prove he was guilty.

There's no significant doubt in my mind he broke laws. But that doesn't mean he's going to get convicted of it. There's no doubt in my mind hillary broke the laws just as badly and she skated .

 

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
13 hours ago, Rebound said:

False.

The National Archives did not know that Trump took Classified information from the White House. They only knew that he took Presidential Records. When they first asked him to return ALL of the records, he sent some boxes back (by mail, I think) and the Archives staff found Classified information in the boxes he returned.  That’s what kicked off the FBI investigation, which lead to a subpoena, and then to the search warrant. 

I was just going by what you said, and you said in no uncertain terms that they requested that specific document. From your Doc19 thread:

Quote

 Trump had this document at Mar-a-Lago, he was asked to return it, then he was ordered to return it, then it was discovered at his home after a search warrant was executed. 

FYI "it" is "the definite article", which always refers to one specific thing.

When you say: "They asked for 'it'" that means that they specifically asked for that document. 

If they just knew that he had docs at his place and they just demanded all classified docs in general then you should have said that. 

You're the one who's making all of the accusations, and you're the one who specifically said that they were specifically asking for "it", ie doc 19. 

At the very best your reply should start with "My bad, I posted the wrong info", not "false". 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I was just going by what you said, and you said in no uncertain terms that they requested that specific document. From your Doc19 thread:

FYI "it" is "the definite article", which always refers to one specific thing.

When you say: "They asked for 'it'" that means that they specifically asked for that document. 

If they just knew that he had docs at his place and they just demanded all classified docs in general then you should have said that. 

You're the one who's making all of the accusations, and you're the one who specifically said that they were specifically asking for "it", ie doc 19. 

At the very best your reply should start with "My bad, I posted the wrong info", not "false". 

FBI knew he had Classified-marked materials because they subpoenaed surveillance footage of Mar-a-Lago and saw Walt moving the boxes around, plus they interviewed the staff and the SS guys and learned that he had not returned all the documents. 
 

Trump was interviewed on Fox yesterday and they asked him why didn’t he just return everything when he was subpoenaed. Trump said he had other things in the boxes, like golf shirts and shorts, and he didn’t have time to go through it all. Unfortunately for Trump, this pathetic defense of his turns out to be an admission that he withheld Classified material despite signing an affidavit swearing that all Classified materials had been returned.  Big lie from Trump!  

Edited by Rebound

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Rebound said:

FBI knew he had Classified-marked materials because they subpoenaed surveillance footage of Mar-a-Lago and saw Walt moving the boxes around, plus they interviewed the staff and the SS guys and learned that he had not returned all the documents. 

IMO doc 19 is just "meh".

I personally had access to secret material as a Naval Weapons Tech. Basically, I was aware that we had weapons at our ship's disposal that weren't listed in Jane's. That was "secret". OOH BOY!

If I tried to "sell" that "secret info" to Russians they'd laugh their asses off. They wouldn't give a rat's ass what weapons we had on our ship. What we were having for dinner would be equally important. 

7 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Trump was interviewed on Fox yesterday and they asked him why didn’t he just return everything when he was subpoenaed. Trump said he had other things in the boxes, like golf shirts and shorts, and he didn’t have time to go through it all. Unfortunately for Trump, this pathetic defense of his turns out to be an admission that he withheld Classified material despite signing an affidavit swearing that all Classified materials had been returned.  Big lie from Trump!  

?

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

IMO doc 19 is just "meh".

I personally had access to secret material as a Naval Weapons Tech. Basically, I was aware that we had weapons at our ship's disposal that weren't listed in Jane's. That was "secret". OOH BOY!

If I tried to "sell" that "secret info" to Russians they'd laugh their asses off. They wouldn't give a rat's ass what weapons we had on our ship. What we were having for dinner would be equally important. 

?

As you know, he claims that he declassified all of the documents.  But under Federal law, a President cannot declassify a classified nuclear secret. 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted

Part of me wants Trump to win his case, just so I can antagonize the OP, and ask him every post:

"When is Trump going to jail?" And follow up daily, "he just had a speech in the white house. Maybe they arrest him, today?"

"Maybe in 4 years?"

I don't even like Trump and this would be satisfying. 

It would humble the far left. Stop p****ng people off. Listen to your constituents. 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

Part of me wants Trump to win his case, just so I can antagonize the OP, and ask him every post:

"When is Trump going to jail?" And follow up daily, "he just had a speech in the white house. Maybe they arrest him, today?"

"Maybe in 4 years?"

I don't even like Trump and this would be satisfying. 

It would humble the far left. Stop p****ng people off. Listen to your constituents. 

 

I am my own constituent. 
 

Trump should go to prison for this because anyone else who did the exact same thing would go to prison for it. 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Trump should

Should and will are vastly different. A lot of things should happen in life.

Death eventually will happen. 

The fact you're so angry at the guy, is unhealthy. 

Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

The fact you're so angry at the guy, is unhealthy. 

What's actually unhealthy is the way these people try to bend reality to suit their confirmation bias.

Right at the beginning of the Trump saga the MSM tripped all over themselves lying about Trump when they really didn't have to. They could have told the truth and it would have been enough.

For example, the fact that he said (about Meghan Kelly): "She really didn't like me. She had blood coming out of her eyes and her, whatever" was so gross that it was impossible for people to take him seriously. I don't think there's anyone who supports Trump's ability as a president who wouldn't admit that he's one of the very few people who's so crass that he could be fired from bouncing at a dive bar. 

Instead of focusing on that, and the other things that he actually said and did, they kept trying to nail him on things that were ostensibly false. Russian collusion, honestly? Then after he was elected there was raindropgate, banning visitors from China is racist, etc. Then the FBI committed crimes trying to nail him... WTF? How did Trump wind up being the good guy and the FBI the bad guys? It's actually mind-blowing. 

Trump sucks at humaning but he's such a me-first guy with such a massive ego that he really did put his country way ahead of all others. Other prezzies who were far better at being humans were far worse at leading the USA.

"A friend to all is a friend to none" and Trump really only cares about the US. I think that other presidents put their own priorities way ahead of the country. For Obama it was domestic politics, for Biden it's family money, Dubya was the Christian cowboy, etc. Clinton was the only other decent (lol) president going back 20 years. Maybe Trump and Clinton put their dicks and the country first. 

Edited by WestCanMan

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
46 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

The fact you're so angry at the guy, is unhealthy. 

Poor fellow is ill. He's got a classic case of "Trump Derangment Syndrome". 
:blink:  :wacko:

Posted
13 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Maybe Trump and Clinton put their dicks and the country first. 

Now the country is one to be ashamed of, and dicks can be discarded o_O

#Have a Bud Light. 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Perspektiv said:

Now the country is one to be ashamed of, and dicks can be discarded o_O

Canada is a country to be ashamed of as well and we never had Trump or Clinton.

Lorena Bobbit was a trailblazer, who knew?

Quote

#Have a Bud Light. 

A beer with a side of progressive politics? No thanks. I'm not much of a beer drinker anyways. I drink maybe 36 beers a year. 

  • Haha 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
37 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

Ditto. You get what you give.

Look in the mirror. 

You’re the one who started attacking me. All I did was point it out.  

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
17 hours ago, Rebound said:

As you know, he claims that he declassified all of the documents.  But under Federal law, a President cannot declassify a classified nuclear secret. 

 Doesn't need to.  He just has to prove that he thought he did.   Hillary's case changed the burden of proof to requiring mens rea - a guilty mind.  So if he genuinely thought the documents were NOT classified then he didn't intentionally keep classified documents.

You're trying to CSI Jr this thing  and it's far more simple than you think.  He's not going to go to jail over having the documents.  Period.  He will go to jail for either a) distributing the documents to people he shouldn't have,  b) KEEPING the documents knowingly and with intent specifically to do so after being told to give them back,  and/or c) colluding to keep the evidence from the authorities, which is obstruction of justice.

The rest is just political porn you're exciting yourself with  :)    Seriously.

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, CdnFox said:

 Doesn't need to.  He just has to prove that he thought he did.   Hillary's case changed the burden of proof to requiring mens rea - a guilty mind.  So if he genuinely thought the documents were NOT classified then he didn't intentionally keep classified documents.

You're trying to CSI Jr this thing  and it's far more simple than you think.  He's not going to go to jail over having the documents.  Period.  He will go to jail for either a) distributing the documents to people he shouldn't have,  b) KEEPING the documents knowingly and with intent specifically to do so after being told to give them back,  and/or c) colluding to keep the evidence from the authorities, which is obstruction of justice.

The rest is just political porn you're exciting yourself with  :)    Seriously.

No, BS. Read the law.

1) The documents were labeled Classified. 
2) Mens rea is very evident in Trump’s case: Move the boxes. Tell the lawyer about only some of the boxes. Tell the lawyer you handed over all the documents when you know you haven’t. 
 

Trump was on Fox a day or two ago and they asked him why didn’t he give everything back when they asked. Trump’s answer proved his guilt! Trump said he had things like golf shirts and shorts in those boxes and he wanted to go through them, but he was too busy.  Instead of asking for more time, he directed his lawyers to sign an affidavit affirming that he had turned everything over.  Deep Doo Doo. 
 

Hillary didn’t have our nuclear weapons secrets sitting in a box. 

Edited by Rebound

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
37 minutes ago, Rebound said:

No, BS. Read the law.
 

I've read the law kid.

Quote

1) The documents were labeled Classified. 

Did he know that? Did he even know that he still had those documents? You have to be able to prove that.  So what i said was correct.


 

Quote

2) Mens rea is very evident in Trump’s case: Move the boxes.

He didn't mean THOSE boxes - the aide misunderstood.  Also he thought those ones only had momentos left in them and no classified documents. Also he never looked inside them so how did he know they were labeled classified? Also someone else obivously reorganized his boxes on him at some point. Also....

You see how that works?

Quote

Tell the lawyer about only some of the boxes. Tell the lawyer you handed over all the documents when you know you haven’t. 

Well i just addressed that of course.  "I was sure all those boxes were still there, the aide moved the wrong ones", etc etc etc.  Pretty simple.

Quote

Trump was on Fox a day or two ago and they asked him why didn’t he give everything back when they asked. Trump’s answer proved his guilt! Trump said he had things like golf shirts and shorts in those boxes and he wanted to go through them, but he was too busy.  Instead of asking for more time, he directed his lawyers to sign an affidavit affirming that he had turned everything over.  Deep Doo Doo. 

Not really. Whats' said in court matters. It sounds like what he MEANT was that he didn't think there were any classified docs in those ones.

It's super easy to create doubt. And that's all he needs.
 

Quote

Hillary didn’t have our nuclear weapons secrets sitting in a box. 

Hillary had tonnes of classified documents and LIED about having them, and then tried to destroy them to hide that she'd had them. Swore up and down she didn't mean to have the records destroyed but it was ok because none were classified - but we now know that tonnes were.

And if anthony weiner had them - who else did.

She's 100 percent every bit as guilty as trump.  Lets not pretend otherwise.

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
21 hours ago, Rebound said:

You seem pretty obsessed.  

He just gave an accurate critique of you and you clapped back like  an angry toddler. 

  • Haha 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
On 6/21/2023 at 10:32 AM, Rebound said:

You’re the one who started attacking me. All I did was point it out.  

Meh. You're just whining now

cause you got hoisted

by your own petard.

;) 

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

Meh. You're just whining now

cause you got hoisted

by your own petard.

;) 

I thought it would be interesting  to create a thread which simply focused on the facts of the legal case, but everything here always has to devolve into somebody insulting someone else. 

Edited by Rebound

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Rebound said:

I thought it would be interesting  to create a thread which simply focused on the facts of the legal case, but everything here always has to devolve into somebody insulting someone else. 

No it doesn't you butthead!!! :)

 

(note - this parody post was for comic relief and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the poster.  No Buttheads were harmed in the making of this post.)

  • Haha 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,017
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    taylor66
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Canadaisintrouble earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • AlizyMalik earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...