Artificial Intelligence: Professional Liar Bots. Are They Here at Repolitics?

[ExFlyer]

14 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I saw what you did there

I don't really agree with the post, but i'm giving you an upvote just for the sheer punnery of it

Thanks

You do not agree that Fox got caught in their lies and had to settle and pay 3/4 of a billion dollars?

And that there is another company suing Fox for the same thing except for more money?

[Nationalist]

9 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

AI has the ability to learn. Theoretically, upon being told to do so, two AI computers invented their own language. 

Dr J Peterson tasked Chat GPT to write an essay on the 13th rule for Beyond Order, written in the style that's a mixture of the King James Bible and the Tao Te Ching, based on two of his books: Beyond Order and 12 Rules for life. He said that it generated 4 pages in 3 seconds and that he wouldn't be able to tell that he didn't write it himself.

If an AI chat site can do a 4-page Jordan Peterson essay in 3 seconds then it can generate 4 billion poopy leftard posts based on CNN douche-baggery in half a second. 

I'm not kidding.

Basically all you have to do is tell it: "When posed any question which, answered honestly, answer will result in admitting that something a leftist politician did was wrong/immoral/illegal, or admitting that you don't have any facts or stats to support your argument, always use this format: "If you don't think that [insert opinion here] is awesome then [choose one of the following: you're a racist, you are anti-science, you are stoopid]." Never stray from the script."

You could replace half a dozen posters here just with that sentence and no one would notice.

"If you don't think that the vaccine is completely safe and will prevent you from dying of covid then you are anti-science."

"If you don't think that Jan 6th was as bad as Pearl Harbour then you're a racist."

"If you don't think that Hillary won the 2106 election then you're a racist."

"If you don't think that Trump said "All immigrants are animals" then you're stoopid." 

If the "poster" has a name like JunkYardDawg use some vulgar insults. If the name is Dr Everything then use some words that are 6 letters long (don't get crazy and use 8 letter words or people will know that it's not really a leftist posting).

Once you've seen it, you can't un-see it. It's hard to not believe that some of our resident leftists are bots.  

Agreed. But the computer responses are programmed. The bias is programmed. It doesn't get an opportunity to explore opposing opinions because that's not the response its programmed to give.

Edited April 21, 2023 by Nationalist

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

Thanks

You do not agree that Fox got caught in their lies and had to settle and pay 3/4 of a billion dollars?

And that there is another company suing Fox for the same thing except for more money?

Gee...sounds a lot like Nick Sandmann.

Don't get your flag out and start waving. The Libbie media is just as crooked.

More so IMO. They openly lie daily.

[ExFlyer]

12 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Gee...sounds a lot like Nick Sandmann.

Don't get your flag out and start waving. The Libbie media is just as crooked.

More so IMO. They openly lie daily.

Don't be so obtuse.

Sandman lost his case...are you trying to say something? Fox is like Sandman?

Not waving  a flag, just making a Fox groupie own it. 

I simply responded to your statement that  "I don't really agree with the post" which had 2 statements.

1. "Fox got caught in their lies... and now have to pay"  and,

2. "Oh wait, another company is suing too....how much will they settle on with them? "

What is it you do to not agree with?

Edited April 21, 2023 by ExFlyer

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Thanks

You do not agree that Fox got caught in their lies and had to settle and pay 3/4 of a billion dollars?

And that there is another company suing Fox for the same thing except for more money?

I more disagreed with your tone and this:

he only total shit of the political spectrum is the trump and Fox followers. Get it, you losers LOL

Fox lied and got caught. All the other media have lied and got caught and had to pay settlements too.  I don't see any difference really and i'm not sure it's appropriate to suggest that somehow it's ONLY the people who watch the liars YOU disapprove of that are 'total shit"  instead of the ones who watch the liars you do approve of.

But the joke was hilarious

[ExFlyer]

8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I more disagreed with your tone and this:

he only total shit of the political spectrum is the trump and Fox followers. Get it, you losers LOL

Fox lied and got caught. All the other media have lied and got caught and had to pay settlements too.  I don't see any difference really and i'm not sure it's appropriate to suggest that somehow it's ONLY the people who watch the liars YOU disapprove of that are 'total shit"  instead of the ones who watch the liars you do approve of.

But the joke was hilarious

Tone is in the receiver.

If offended, sorry.

Was only quoting another poster. In my opinion, he is deluginal The discussion and other posters defence if to Fox.

[CdnFox]

22 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Tone is in the receiver.

LOL - oh please    The writer sets the tone.

Or are you claiming that when you called fox viewers "shit" you meant it in the positive, friendly way and are just being misinterpreted

Please. A man owns what he did and the tone there was pretty specific

 

22 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

If offended, sorry.

No offense - i just didn't agree with it.

22 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Was only quoting another poster. In my opinion, he is deluginal The discussion and other posters defence if to Fox.

And that was hilarious But - that's why i didn't want to associate myself with the rest of the post, but wanted to acknowledge the very clever joke

[ExFlyer]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

LOL - oh please    The writer sets the tone.

Or are you claiming that when you called fox viewers "shit" you meant it in the positive, friendly way and are just being misinterpreted

Please. A man owns what he did and the tone there was pretty specific

 

No offense - i just didn't agree with it.

And that was hilarious But - that's why i didn't want to associate myself with the rest of the post, but wanted to acknowledge the very clever joke

Only regurgitating the posters words.

Anyway, Fox sucked back before the superior court could adjudicate and Fox still has more to come.

[CdnFox]

14 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Only regurgitating the posters words.

Fair enough - but regardless of whether they are yours or a repeat of someone else's I wasn't interested in suggesting i approve of it.

14 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Anyway, Fox sucked back before the superior court could adjudicate and Fox still has more to come.

And always will. Fox don't care. CNN don't care - they've lost some doozies as well. NBC don't care.

What they care about is ratings and their ratings have gone way up. I'm sure they'll work harder in the future to hide the evidence better but they'll always be pushing the line and getting sued. sometimes successfully and sometimes not. They all will.

Which i think is terrible - They do the deed, they get insurance to pay most of the fine and they move on  to do it again, and the public has no honest sources of information.

Mark twain said: "if you don't read the paper, you're uninformed. If you DO read the paper you're misinformed".  Even more true 130 years later.

[Nationalist]

8 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Don't be so obtuse.

Sandman lost his case...are you trying to say something? Fox is like Sandman?

Not waving  a flag, just making a Fox groupie own it. 

I simply responded to your statement that  "I don't really agree with the post" which had 2 statements.

1. "Fox got caught in their lies... and now have to pay"  and,

2. "Oh wait, another company is suing too....how much will they settle on with them? "

What is it you do to not agree with?

Actually, WAPO and CNN settled.  Not really losing.

I don't agree with the lawsuits. Nor the one settlement. 

[ExFlyer]

18 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Actually, WAPO and CNN settled.  Not really losing.

I don't agree with the lawsuits. Nor the one settlement. 

Welcome to the USA, probably the most litigious country in the world. A society that thrives on settlements.

Oh and "settling" outside of court is admission of guilt and losing, afraid of waiting to see and hear the potential judgment.

Edited April 22, 2023 by ExFlyer

[CdnFox]

20 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Welcome to the USA, probably the most litigious country in the world. A society that thrives on settlements.

it's like that old american saying  - "I'm NOT a litigious man. But my lawyer is. "

[Deluge]

On 4/20/2023 at 2:10 PM, ExFlyer said:

AHa HA HA...so deluginale.

Fox got caught in their lies... and now have to pay, oh, did you hear, 3/4 of a billion dollars that they offered to pay LOL  Better to pay than get fully embarrassed in superior court.

Oh wait, another company is suing too....how much will they settle on with them?

the only total shit of the political spectrum is the trump and Fox followers. Get it, you losers LOL

"deluginale".... that's pretty good for a bedwetter. Did you and your boyfriend think up that one all by yourselves? 

Let's see, Dominion voting is a piece of shit outfit that was founded in Venezuela to rig elections for Hugo Chavez. Of course, woke liars will tell you that it was founded by John Poulos and that the software runs clean elections, but we all know that's horse shit.  

Fox was right to question the cheaters at Dominion. it's just that they lacked the fortitude to fight back.

Still, they're better than the rest of the news outlets, so there is that. 

I'm right and you're wrong - and you're also gay.  

Edited April 22, 2023 by Deluge

[ExFlyer]

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

"deluginale".... that's pretty good for a bedwetter. Did you and your boyfriend think up that one all by yourselves? 

Let's see, Dominion voting is a piece of shit outfit that was founded in Venezuela to rig elections for Hugo Chavez. Of course, woke liars will tell you that it was founded by John Poulos and that the software runs clean elections, but we all know that's horse shit.  

Fox was right to question the cheaters at Dominion. it's just that they lacked the fortitude to fight back.

Still, they're better than the rest of the news outlets, so there is that. 

I'm right and you're wrong - and you're also gay.  

A loser fighting a losing battle and still hanging with Fox BS,a real trooper...uh, I mean trumper LOL.

Bedwetter? Gay? Got no defence, caught and stuck in lies so you resort to name calling, like all trumpers and fox groupies. LOL

The bandwagon has lots of room because everyone is jumping off.

Edited April 22, 2023 by ExFlyer

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

"deluginale".... that's pretty good for a bedwetter.

DUDE! He gave you 'deluginale' and you bring back ... "bedwetter"??!?!?!! 

Damn man - step it up. The bar's been set!  At least make an effort - like "ex-fuguer" or  SOMETHING.

Also - dominion was actually started in the US and is a US company and always has been.

[CdnFox]

14 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

I don't see MAGA and their name-calling shenanigans can cut it this time around. It's not like back in 2016 when insults could get you elected. 

Dude , it's exactly like 2016 when insults could get you elected. If anything it's more so.

14 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

I get why the Dems would prefer MAGA as an opponent for ol' Joe, unless the economy tanks and makes folks mad enough to consider Trump, that would be the only way, for him to come in and offer himself as a solution if things are bad.

Well you have to understand how us politics works a bit. Voter turn out plays a huge roll, and momentum does too.

Polling shows that people are deeply disappointed in biden. So that won't be the problem - and there's no indication he'll get better.

But the one thing trump needs to do is present a vision for the future - not just 'i'm trump, vote orange'.  The last time 'make america great again' really resonated with people. I"m not sure you can just recycle that 8 years later and hope for a win. And you can't get by with promises here and there , it has to be a coherent picture.

If he fails,  it will be because he forgot about that. You can have insults but if you don't have a vision then nothing works.

[ExFlyer]

4 hours ago, Contrarian said:

I can agree that his slogan of 'Make America Great Again' was a powerful message in 2016, also people had enough of the mockery on the Jimmy Kimmel type of shows, lots of people that said did not vote for Trump, voted for Trump as a slap to the arrogance of the establishment, etc, but do you think that same message will have the same impact now, 8 years later, after all the friction and scandals? What new ideas or policies do you think Trump can offer to convince voters that he has a somewhat picture for the future? What can he do to offer/sell to resonate with the American people, you think? 

Well, going back to the topic, trump can use ChatGTP and Bard AI to get a new message out.

Pump out a new AI message at every whistle stop and get the folks back on board. LOL

thing is, he needs learn how to spell it

Edited April 22, 2023 by ExFlyer

[ExFlyer]

48 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

No, I think he will wait for Elon Musk's version, apparently the above 2 might be too soft for his needs. ?

Wait, Elon Musks version is supposed to be the truth only.

Trump cannot use that!!  ?

[CdnFox]

28 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

but do you think that same message will have the same impact now, 8 years later, after all the friction and scandals?

Well as i just said in the section you quoted, no probably not You never know - it certainly has been used before - kennedy ran on 'make america great' and regan ran on 'lets make america great again'.  But i think it's too soon to dust it off for this go around. 

 

29 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

What new ideas or policies do you think Trump can offer to convince voters that he has a somewhat picture for the future?

Well that's the million dollar question. It has to be simple and it has to resonate.

But pretty much every candidate runs against the incumbent with a message of change.  Clinton was 'for people for change"  Obama was 'change we can believe in"  and 'Yes we can".

So maybe something like 'America Back on Track" or something like that - "america was doing great the last time i was president, now after four years of sleepy joe everything's ruined. Let's get america back on track".  Then pitch the same things as last time - better paying jobs, better reputation internationally, bring the enemy to heel, focus on giving opportunity to the people.

You know - all the good republican things

If he was smart (which he really isn't) - he'd hammer home how people like what sleepy joe says - but not what he does.  Whereas with trump you may not like what he says, but you like what he does (better economy etc). - ties into the  'back on track' motif.

 

[blackbird]

Yes, I sometimes think there are a few liar-BOTS on here too.  They seem to be programmed by the Devil himself.  Best thing is to ignore them.

[Hodad]

On 4/17/2023 at 8:35 PM, bcsapper said:

How can you both be afraid of being lied to and watch Tucker Carlson?

It does not compute.

He's not afraid of lying. He's just afraid that technology can do it so much faster that it will "take his job."

[WestCanMan]

16 hours ago, blackbird said:

Yes, I sometimes think there are a few liar-BOTS on here too.  They seem to be programmed by the Devil himself.  Best thing is to ignore them.

Maybe we should have to do one of those re-captcha things every time we log in. Humans are theoretically still better than AI bots at figuring those out.

[Deluge]

On 4/22/2023 at 9:00 AM, ExFlyer said:

A loser fighting a losing battle and still hanging with Fox BS,a real trooper...uh, I mean trumper LOL.

Bedwetter? Gay? Got no defence, caught and stuck in lies so you resort to name calling, like all trumpers and fox groupies. LOL

The bandwagon has lots of room because everyone is jumping off.

Did you know that the CIA rigged elections in Eastern Europe using Dominion? Wow, what a bunch of cheating shitbags. 

Dominion acquired the vote-rigging software when it purchased Sequoia Voting Systems from Smartmatic (or Cheatmatic?) which originally developed the software.

Here's the non-compete: 

https://thenationalpulse.com/2020/11/21/dominion-smartmatic-are-not-actually-competitors/

Well, it's no surprise that you would defend a bunch of f*cking cheats - you are a democrat after all,

 

 

 

[Deluge]

On 4/22/2023 at 9:50 AM, CdnFox said:

DUDE! He gave you 'deluginale' and you bring back ... "bedwetter"??!?!?!! 

Damn man - step it up. The bar's been set!  At least make an effort - like "ex-fuguer" or  SOMETHING.

Also - dominion was actually started in the US and is a US company and always has been.

What can I say? It was pretty good.

Here's what's funny. I gave the bedwetter his props, yet YOU want more. As if YOU live YOUR life vicariously through ExFlyer. Do you eat the same foods he eats, or dress the same way he does? Do you both go out in drag on Friday nights? lol

Edited April 24, 2023 by Deluge

[ExFlyer]

23 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Did you know that the CIA rigged elections in Eastern Europe using Dominion? Wow, what a bunch of cheating shitbags. 

Dominion acquired the vote-rigging software when it purchased Sequoia Voting Systems from Smartmatic (or Cheatmatic?) which originally developed the software.

Here's the non-compete: 

https://thenationalpulse.com/2020/11/21/dominion-smartmatic-are-not-actually-competitors/

Well, it's no surprise that you would defend a bunch of f*cking cheats - you are a democrat after all,

 

 

 

Frack man, you are so deep in conspiracy theory that you should have trouble breathing fresh air LOL

You are not even funny anymore, you are a sad individual.

 

BTW, your man Carlson "agreed" to depart Fox (agree to depart means get lost or be embarrassed by being fired LOL)

Who is next on the Fox cut list??