West Posted March 11, 2023 Report Posted March 11, 2023 Liberal MP Mary Ng seems to think that criticizing the Supreme leader is racist Quote
Moonlight Graham Posted March 11, 2023 Report Posted March 11, 2023 (edited) Virtually any Chinese-Canadian with loved ones still in China can be intimidated and blackmailed whether they like it or not. It's a major national security concern. This is a fact and its unfortunate, but a fact that isn't politically correct doesn't make it less true. I have no idea how they should deal with this problem. We need to be fair to people and do our best not to racially stereotype, but also recognize risks where they exist. That's a tough line to straddle. Edited March 11, 2023 by Moonlight Graham 1 Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
myata Posted March 11, 2023 Report Posted March 11, 2023 Anything can be anything in Canada for a simple reason: because they can. Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
CdnFox Posted March 11, 2023 Report Posted March 11, 2023 It's racists if the question annoys the liberals. Otherwise it's fine. 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
myata Posted March 11, 2023 Report Posted March 11, 2023 O China North, glorious and free Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
myata Posted March 11, 2023 Report Posted March 11, 2023 5 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said: It's a major national security concern. Yeah weren't governments supposed to evaluate those before taking major decisions like opening up immigration floodgates, like where is a mystery, the great secret here? But that was in another galaxy far, far away. 1 Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
ironstone Posted March 11, 2023 Report Posted March 11, 2023 It's not racist in any way and it's a sad attempt by Mary Ng and Trudeau to deflect attention. Clearly she does not want to offend China in any way. 1 1 Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
Guest Posted March 11, 2023 Report Posted March 11, 2023 If you're going to accuse something of racism, shouldn't you have to validate the statement with proof? Quote
myata Posted March 11, 2023 Report Posted March 11, 2023 5 minutes ago, Perspektiv said: shouldn't you have to validate the statement with proof? Why would you, if you can (not)? What would be the consequence of saying, or doing anything without validating it? In a Canadian majority government, I mean. Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
CdnFox Posted March 11, 2023 Report Posted March 11, 2023 2 hours ago, myata said: O China North, glorious and free Well.... glorious anyway. Well.... north anyway. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
CdnFox Posted March 11, 2023 Report Posted March 11, 2023 41 minutes ago, Perspektiv said: If you're going to accuse something of racism, shouldn't you have to validate the statement with proof? Yeah - it's been at least 20 years since that was a thing Math is racist now. Once the bar has been set that low basically everything is unless it's the liberals doing it. Remember when it was RRRRRRRRRRAAAAACCIST to suggest shutting down the border to china at the beginning of the pandemic? Remember when the gov't did it a year later during a later outbreak and suddenly it was perfectly normal? 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
I am Groot Posted March 11, 2023 Report Posted March 11, 2023 1 hour ago, Perspektiv said: If you're going to accuse something of racism, shouldn't you have to validate the statement with proof? It's white fragility to ask that! /s 1 Quote "A civilization is not destroyed by wicked men; it is destroyed by weak men who cannot defend what is good.” — G. K. Chesterton
myata Posted March 11, 2023 Report Posted March 11, 2023 (edited) "Have to support China here", as the saying went. But look, if you never had to explain plain common sense of what you're saying ("travel from Wuhan not a problem here") wouldn't you end up one fine morning speaking gibberish abracadabra, mostly or only? Why wouldn't you, if you can? Edited March 11, 2023 by myata Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.