blackbird Posted January 13 Author Report Share Posted January 13 If this fella started a Go-Fund Me campaign for his legal defence, I'm sure a fortune would be contributed across Canada. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 He would still lose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 10 hours ago, Zeitgeist said: Canadians are only allowed to have one political perspective. If they criticize the government they lose their jobs or are disciplined and forced to make apologies. Free speech is dead in Canada. The recent court orders compelling speech are straight out of Stalin’s USSR. Nonsense, I criticize the government all the time and I still have my job. I even require official government certification for my job too so it would be really easy to cancel me. Why haven't they? Here I'll even do it again...Trudeau is a silly little dilettante and the Liberal Party is as corrupt as the day is long. $10 bucks says I'll still have my job in the morning. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contrarian Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 (edited) 6 hours ago, blackbird said: If this fella started a Go-Fund Me campaign for his legal defence, I'm sure a fortune would be contributed across Canada. This is your idea about good agents in federal police/intelligence? The only requirement is to not like a politician? Double the points for being a buffoon on the internet? Do you know this agent, his history? You are willing to follow blindly haha. Now you know why people like you can never come close to a position of power, puts state security at risk. Why would he start a GoFund? He can leave his career, it seems he does not have respect for his profession anyways, and then start a radio, tv show. I think he will do a great job, capitalism rewards people with original ideas such as his with his church. Edited January 13 by Contrarian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackbird Posted January 13 Author Report Share Posted January 13 (edited) 3 hours ago, Contrarian said: The only requirement is to not like a politician? Congratulations! Did you finally figure out political preferences is matter of choosing the least evil? Seems to me Trudeau doesn't like his opposition. He often smears them. So how is that any different? Sounds hypocritical to say he doesn't like a politician. That's how most politicians operate. Exactly the same. That's politics in the real world. 3 hours ago, Contrarian said: Double the points for being a buffoon on the internet? Pretty clever buffoon. He is brilliant. That's why the liberals won't like him. He knows how to be most effective. Whatever occupation he is in, he is a brilliant asset. Very clever. He likely has a lot of respect for his occupation or profession. Would you rather have a dumb puppet who can't think for himself and won't say a word about what is going on in the world or a brilliant thinker like him? I would pick him. He gets five stars for his originality. Edited January 13 by blackbird Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contrarian Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 (edited) 8 minutes ago, blackbird said: 1. Pretty clever buffoon. He is brilliant. That's why the liberals won't like him. He knows how to be most effective. 2. Whatever occupation he is in, he is a brilliant asset. Very clever. He likely has a lot of respect for his occupation or profession. 3. Would you rather have a dumb puppet who can't think for himself and won't say a word about what is going on in the world or a brilliant thinker like him? I would pick him. He gets five stars for his originality. 1. Yes, this is why I am saying for his cause he can do better in efficiency by emerging himself into trolling liberals daily. He will get followers and spread the message. 2. He is an asset because you are an ideologue and he happened to critiqued Trudeau. If another agent critiques a Conservative leader, you would call him a "traitor". Boring idealism 101. 3. At the end of the day the RCMP is a federal agency, in any profession nobody says to love the system that pays you as in communism, but ethics says you don't bite the hand that feeds you. A certain professionalism, ESPECIALLY in law enforcement, this is not even the private industry, if you ever have been involved in business, it tells you to not bite the hand that feeds you. There's the wife, friends, a therapist one can vent to, but once you turn it into a circus online based on an obsession for a politician, clearly RCMP is not for you, but that is my opinion. Trolling on the radio and he will make big $. Nothing illegal, just an amateur that does not value his career. Edited January 13 by Contrarian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackbird Posted January 13 Author Report Share Posted January 13 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Contrarian said: but ethics says you don't bite the hand that feeds you How is he biting the hand that feeds him? He would have to be talking about the RCMP which he isn't. He is talking about politicians just like everyone else does. That's his right under the basic fundamental freedom of expression, which you scoff at and reject. How about Trudeau and the liberals show some respect for the police by not letting dangerous criminals out onto the streets repeatedly to take the lives of innocent policemen? Edited January 13 by blackbird Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contrarian Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 (edited) 22 minutes ago, blackbird said: How about Trudeau and the liberals show some respect for the police by not letting dangerous criminals out onto the streets repeatedly to take the lives of innocent policemen? I don't agree with letting dangerous criminals out onto the streets. The rest is just your idealism talking again. If it was the story of an officer speaking his mind about Conservative leaders you would call him a communist. but because this "officer" from the RCMP happened to critiqued your obsession too, then he is a hero. See you in another discussion. We are going around circles. Edited January 13 by Contrarian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonbox Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 13 hours ago, blackbird said: If this fella started a Go-Fund Me campaign for his legal defence, I'm sure a fortune would be contributed across Canada. Yes, and dumdums all over would probably still contribute, even though there are no legal charges against him, nor (as far as I can see), even any formal discipline. So far all that's happened is that someone pointed it out, and the community is questioning how appropriate it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nefarious Banana Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 1 hour ago, Moonbox said: Yes, and dumdums all over would probably still contribute, even though there are no legal charges against him, nor (as far as I can see), even any formal discipline. Frozen bank accounts be appropriate then? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeitgeist Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 13 hours ago, eyeball said: Nonsense, I criticize the government all the time and I still have my job. I even require official government certification for my job too so it would be really easy to cancel me. Why haven't they? Here I'll even do it again...Trudeau is a silly little dilettante and the Liberal Party is as corrupt as the day is long. $10 bucks says I'll still have my job in the morning. No one knows who the [email protected] Eyeball is. Besides, you’re a communist, so you get full party protection. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 14 hours ago, eyeball said: Nonsense, I criticize the government all the time and I still have my job. I even require official government certification for my job too so it would be really easy to cancel me. Why haven't they? Here I'll even do it again...Trudeau is a silly little dilettante and the Liberal Party is as corrupt as the day is long. $10 bucks says I'll still have my job in the morning. You don’t work for government in a position where you have authority over public citizens. You aren’t a civil servant. In my job I knew I would be subject to discipline if my actions were seen to harm my company’s image or reputation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 33 minutes ago, Aristides said: You don’t work for government in a position where you have authority over public citizens. You aren’t a civil servant. In my job I knew I would be subject to discipline if my actions were seen to harm my company’s image or reputation. I'm subject to that at work too. Note however the way Zeitgeist worded the post I responded too. He specified Canadians in the context of Stalin - presumably he means every Canadian is subject to being fired. His back-peddling comment No one knows who the [email protected] Eyeball is does not cut it given how he's associated Stalin with things. The Stalinesque dictatorships Zeitgeist constantly refers throughout this forum make a very express point of knowing who the [email protected] everyone is and especially when they're criticizing them. This is not just unthinking hyperbole Zeitgeist is engaging in - call him out a little and he'll back-peddle a little but it's very difficult to not think on some level it's all very real to him. It's bad enough when posters read stuff that was never said in between lines of posts they respond to but does that mean I'm supposed to read a bunch of benefit-of-doubt into theirs or worse do their back-peddling for them? If this is just a sloppy off-hand imprecise way of talking or joking that shouldn't be taken seriously put sarcasm/off at the end of it or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxme Posted January 13 Report Share Posted January 13 23 hours ago, PIK said: He has a right to do what he wants, i guess. But being a police officer, he should have known better, that's the problem. I am pretty sure that the majority of cops out there do vote during election time. And I am pretty sure that many will vote for either the CPC, lefty Liberals or NDP communists. Maybe cops should not be allowed to vote anymore just in case many of them may decide to vote for the CPC. If that cop had of made fun of Pierre Poilevre nothing would be done about it. To mock and attack the sacred cow of liberalism is now seen as blasphemy. This present day WEF Marxist globalist buffoon in Ottawa that is running and ruining this once great British/European country should be criticized and made fun of because he is just one big freakin joke. 🙃 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxme Posted January 14 Report Share Posted January 14 8 hours ago, Nefarious Banana said: Frozen bank accounts be appropriate then? Indeed. Freeze his bank account. That should shut him up and teach him a lesson that he should not criticize our dear leader Marxist in Ottawa ever again. It's very hard to believe that we have a buffoon as leader of this country who likes to freeze bank accounts on his enemies. The freezing of bank accounts in Canada is just another step towards Canada becoming a communist country one day. And just wait until WEF globalist social credit digital currency kicks in and we become a cashless society. The Marxist government in Ottawa will have a field day when that day gets here. Say something that the government does not like to hear, and bingo, your bank account may become frozen. Hey, we never know, eh? PS: I try and pay cash as much as possible. The least the government knows about where my money goes the better. I have been in one store that refused to take money. Is this just the beginning of this tyranny? We must wait and see. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackbird Posted January 15 Author Report Share Posted January 15 (edited) "Simply put, it is not a matter of one’s professional competence or ethics to hold and express opinions regarding public figures. It is not an erosion of public trust that a member of an order strongly holds an opinion. Rather, this exercise of authority by the College of Psychologists of Ontario against Dr. Jordan Peterson appears arbitrary, and as such shows a capricious disregard for the discretion that all professional orders must exercise. In taking this action, the CPO is effecting reputational harm on itself. Worse yet, it is suggesting that it is within the bounds of a professional order’s purview to police the private views of its members." This involves a well-known defender of freedom of expression, Jordan Peterson. The persecution of Jordan Peterson is relevant. We should all be concerned about this kind of thing. Letters: Canadians shouldn't be complacent about the persecution of Jordan Peterson (msn.com) Edited January 15 by blackbird 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suds Posted January 15 Report Share Posted January 15 Our Charter clearly states that Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the rule of law. In other words, every individual is equal before and under the law. Police officers along with judges are seen as main arbiters of the law and are expected to be impartial. On the other hand our Charter allows us fundamental freedoms such as 'freedom of thought, belief, opinions, and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication.' And sometimes the rule of law and free speech conflict with one another. From what I understand this particular RCMP officer wasn't doing anything wrong until outed by the CBC. The moment that occurred, his actions may have put into question the integrity and impartiality of the force as a whole with a number of individuals. Any reprimand in this case should be..... take it down and don't do it again. But i'm not so sure of that either. We'll see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Army Guy Posted January 16 Report Share Posted January 16 On 1/12/2023 at 5:01 PM, blackbird said: Trudeau's progressive multiculturalism no one may question. Where did you get a picture of my sister, ok half sister, she looks better with make up, and some jewelry...and when she was young she got hit in the face with a hockey puck, it can get messy when she takes it out and eats popcorn...keeps falling through her lips... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.