Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
45 minutes ago, West said:

Democrats take another step toward turning the United States into Sudan by referring a political opponent for prosecution

Are you trying to say you believe Trump is ABOVE THE LAW? ?

There is reams of evidence he broke the law and EVERYONE in that circumstance should be prosecuted.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, robosmith said:

Are you trying to say you believe Trump is ABOVE THE LAW? ?

There is reams of evidence he broke the law and EVERYONE in that circumstance should be prosecuted.

Surely you can see the lefties aren't well upstairs

Posted
29 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No, but it's OBVIOUS YOU ARE NOT. The committee has evidence and all you have is your unsubstantiated OPINIONS.

The committee is made up of largely far left loons and a few RINOs. 

Why should I take their "evidence" seriously? 

These people are clearly not well

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, herbie said:

What for? You won't believe it anyway. Once a dupe always a dupe.You can convince some people all of the time.

None then. 

No evidence of an actual crime. No sense in trying to BS me. I speak Prog.

Doesn't matter anyway. No Republican can get a fair trial in Washington DC. 

 

Edited by Infidel Dog
  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, West said:

The committee is made up of largely far left loons and a few RINOs. 

Why should I take their "evidence" seriously? 

These people are clearly not well

Because they have EVIDENCE and TESTIMONY UNDER OATH.

Which far better than the Trump BS you believe.

Posted
41 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

What? You mean like Cassidy (heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend who...) Hutchinson?

No. There was far more than what you're scraping up from the bottom of the barrel.

Are you delusional enough to characterize ALL of the testimony by the few hearsay recountings?

Meanwhile YOU'RE citing a bullshit document from Trump which is NOT even under OATH. IOW, just toilet paper.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I gave you one example just to show you I was paying attention. Your turn Evidence Man.

How about Ray Epps. Can you show me some Ray Epps evidence? No? Why not?

How about those hundreds of hours of video evidence they have but won't show anybody. Prove me wrong. Show me that.

No? What can you show me. Nothing, right? Figures. Lots of claims of evidence but no actual evidence.

You sure you're not Adam Shifty Schiff?

Edited by Infidel Dog
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

I gave you one example just to show you I was paying attention. Your turn Evidence Man.

How about Ray Epps. Can you show me some Ray Epps evidence? No? Why not?

How about those hundreds of hours of video evidence they have but won't show anybody. Prove me wrong. Show me that.

No? What can you show me. Nothing, right? Figures. Lots of claims of evidence but no actual evidence.

You sure you're not Adam Shifty Schiff?

It's the same story as it's been for several years now. No real evidence. Just a bunch of butt-hurt Libbies stroking each other's hatred for Trump.

Edited by Nationalist
  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
7 hours ago, robosmith said:

Because they have EVIDENCE and TESTIMONY UNDER OATH.

Which far better than the Trump BS you believe.

Nonsense.. even the Washington Post is saying this isn't going anywhere. Though that lunatic garland will try

Posted
15 hours ago, West said:

The committee is made up of largely far left loons and a few RINOs. 

Why should I take their "evidence" seriously? 

These people are clearly not well

Maybe you'll take it more seriously when/if Donald gets indicted.....

Posted
11 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

What? You mean like Cassidy (heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend who...) Hutchinson?

There were many more from his inner circle who testified and several others who plead the fifth. But you wouldn't know that because you never watched them.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, West said:

Nonsense.. even the Washington Post is saying this isn't going anywhere. Though that lunatic garland will try

If charges are pressed, everyone will have to testify under oath. They will not be able to plead the fifth and they can go to jail if they lie. Including Trump.

Posted
11 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

I gave you one example just to show you I was paying attention. Your turn Evidence Man.

How about Ray Epps. Can you show me some Ray Epps evidence? No? Why not?

How about those hundreds of hours of video evidence they have but won't show anybody. Prove me wrong. Show me that.

No? What can you show me. Nothing, right? Figures. Lots of claims of evidence but no actual evidence.

You sure you're not Adam Shifty Schiff?

The full report will be out this week. I'll give you the link when I see it.

Not that I expect you to lift a finger to read it cause you've already demonstrated you don't really care by failing to view the hearings.

Posted
10 hours ago, Nationalist said:

It's the same story as it's been for several years now. No real evidence. Just a bunch of butt-hurt Libbies stroking each other's hatred for Trump.

Have you watched the presentations of UNDER OATH TESTIMONY from REPUBLICANS working in Trump's WH?

I didn't think so. Cause you want to ignore the real evidence.

Posted
5 hours ago, West said:

Nonsense.. even the Washington Post is saying this isn't going anywhere. Though that lunatic garland will try

They didn't say that. They said the DoJ is under no obligation to do anything about the referral.

Doesn't mean they WON'T. Sorry.

Posted
30 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The full report will be out this week. I'll give you the link when I see it.

Not that I expect you to lift a finger to read it cause you've already demonstrated you don't really care by failing to view the hearings.

But you seemed to think you knew about all this evidence you say there is right now. I called you on it and it turned out you didn't. Stop whining about it. 

But yeah, put on your big boy pants and come see me when you've actually got something. I'll check it out.

Posted
46 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

But you seemed to think you knew about all this evidence you say there is right now. I called you on it and it turned out you didn't. Stop whining about it. 

But yeah, put on your big boy pants and come see me when you've actually got something. I'll check it out.

Much of the evidence (sworn testimony) has been presented on TV. YOU FAILED to look at it. That is ON YOU.

Unless it just wasn't available in Canada.

Here is: Read an executive summary of the Jan. 6 committee's final report

IF you read any of it to prove you actually care about evidence, I will post the link to the full report.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,025
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Jameslive
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • maro ay earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • maro ay earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Longley earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...