85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

[CdnFox]

11 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You're talking about people being bamboozled now? 🤣

That's pretty rich coming from a little snake-oil addict like yourself.

LOL!

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, Goddess said:

Doctors often prescribe medications for "off-label" use, you dingleberry.

For instance, birth control pills are often prescribed for things like acute acne.

Well sure but like 1 pill a day for a parasite and 100 a day for COVID.

In the meantime people still need vaccine to prevent having to take...100 pills a day.

How many 100's do you need to cure you?

[Goddess]

There is a movie coming about about the technology, here's the trailer:

 It’s a real David & Goliath story about a whistleblower revealing Merck’s decades of fraud with the MMR vaccine. It’s been buried in the courts for the last 14 years but an appeal in June may kick it up to the Supreme Court. 

Based on real-life events, comes the corporate thriller, Protocol 7. Alexis Koprowski, a devoted mother and small-town family lawyer, Adrian Jay, a renegade doctor exiled from the medical profession, and Steve Schilling, a virologist at a prominent vaccine laboratory turned corporate whistleblower, work together to hold a large pharmaceutical corporation accountable for allegedly fraudulent test results behind a failing mumps vaccine.

Protocol 7 takes us behind the corporate curtain, exposing a chain of command that devolves responsibility, prioritizes profits over people, and fosters an amoral mindset of “just following orders.”

 

 

[Goddess]

11 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Well sure but like 1 pill a day for a parasite and 100 a day for COVID.

In the meantime people still need vaccine to prevent having to take...100 pills a day.

How many 100's do you need to cure you?

Cite on IVM dosages, please.

Sorry, but I'm beyond sick and tired of you shit-posting garbage with no links.

[Michael Hardner]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Cite on IVM dosages, please.

There should be a rule here that you need to provide cites before asking for one IMO. 🤨

[Goddess]

26 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

There should be a rule here that you need to provide cites before asking for one IMO. 🤨

You want a cite from me about IVM?

I've been posting them for years now in the Trickle thread.

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Cite on IVM dosages, please.

Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures.3 However, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies suggest that achieving the plasma concentrations necessary for the antiviral efficacy detected in vitro would require administration of doses up to 100-fold higher than those approved for use in humans.4,5

https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/miscellaneous-drugs/ivermectin/

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Sorry, but I'm beyond sick and tired of you shit-posting garbage with no links.

Speaking of which, how's that search for your evidence of a global conspiracy to kill millions so big Pharma could earn billions?

Edited May 24, 2024 by eyeball

[Goddess]

8 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures.3 However, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies suggest that achieving the plasma concentrations necessary for the antiviral efficacy detected in vitro would require administration of doses up to 100-fold higher than those approved for use in humans.4,5

https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/miscellaneous-drugs/ivermectin/

Here's why you should pay more attention to me:

From your link:

Quote

See the FDA webpage Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19 for more information.

When you click on the link, you get this:

The reason the link (and your article) is "not correct or out-of-date" is because AS I TOLD YOU AND LINKED YOU TO - the FDA and CDC recently lost a court case against the FLCCC Frontline doctors who sued them over their misinformation about Ivermectin and won.  

The FDA and CDC were ordered to remove the misinformation.

That article was also debunked in my Trickle thread.

[Michael Hardner]

11 minutes ago, Goddess said:

You want a cite from me about IVM?

No... in our last discussion I asked you for a couple of cites but you didn't come forward.  You could also just say you withdraw the claim.

I had to show my own cites for your post that I didn't care for the Convoy folks or whatever.

I don't have any kind of grudge against you, you know.  I think you do post from the heart. 

You said about me (and eyeball)

"You claim it is virtuous to blindly obey and believe anything the government or its departments tell you."

And...

"I dont' remember you speaking up about much or expressing any kind of sympathy at all and I see you raising long debunked  nonsense about what happened during the Convoy,"

The second one is pretty objectionable, and tells me you don't know me at all.  I think you just fill in the gaps based on my snarkiness and refusal to accept broad and emotional claims about the system/the government/institutions ... but I resent the implication that I would not care about people involved in a grass roots movement.

Anyway, if you don't want to give me the satisfaction that's fine.  I'll move on.  But it's pretty noticeable for you to make claims about me and then go silent... only to ask others for cites.

Anyway, have a nice day sincerely.

 

[Goddess]

@eyeball  The NIH, run by Fauci, is also currently under fire in the US Subcommittee for lying to Congress about all things covid.

You might want to consider that.

[Goddess]

2 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

"You claim it is virtuous to blindly obey and believe anything the government or its departments tell you."

I really don't know how to find specific posts on here.  But I do remember you often commenting that governments and authorities should be trusted and obeyed and you have denigrated posters who don't blindly trust them.

 

4 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

but I resent the implication that I would not care about people involved in a grass roots movement.

I'm sorry you resent it, but that is my impression of you.  I don't think I've seen a post where you don't support gov't and encourage others to.

 

7 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Anyway, have a nice day sincerely.

You as well. 🙂

8 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

But it's pretty noticeable for you to make claims about me and then go silent.

It's just the impressions I get from you and your posts.

[Michael Hardner]

32 minutes ago, Goddess said:

1. I really don't know how to find specific posts on here.  But I do remember you often commenting that governments and authorities should be trusted and obeyed and you have denigrated posters who don't blindly trust them.

2. I'm sorry you resent it, but that is my impression of you.  I don't think I've seen a post where you don't support gov't and encourage others to.

3. It's just the impressions I get from you and your posts.

4. You as well. 🙂

 

1. Ok - so if you can't find cites, then you should at least admit to having a faulty memory sometimes right ?  I found you 3 posts where I expressed sympathy for the Convoy members.
2. 3. Ok.  Well I already found some cites showing a memory gap, and as such I can only ask that you keep an open mind as to your impressions.  I'm not going to go find cites to convince you, though.  You seem nice enough, so I am holding out hope that people on here can disagree and - very occasionally - not need to fill in gaps with negative memories/impressions just because.
4. I hear it's nice outside but I have been in my basement office all day  I should go out... maybe I will.  Cheers.
 

[Goddess]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

Speaking of which, how's that search for your evidence of a global conspiracy to kill millions so big Pharma could earn billions?

Someone else already beat me to it:

COVID-19 and the Global Predators is much more than an analysis of the current exploitation of humanity under cover of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. It discloses for the first time the actual blueprint and master plan that that was ten years in the making by global predators before the pandemic: a plan to reorganize the world in the name of public health. Billionaires, government agencies, giant funds, and major industries collaborated years ahead of time to lay the groundwork for what would become Operation Warp Speed and the Great Reset in 2020. All this is disclosed, individuals and groups are named, and their plans for the future are documented.

 

You should read it and pick it apart.

Edited May 24, 2024 by Goddess

[WestCanMan]

4 hours ago, Goddess said:

@eyeball  The NIH, run by Fauci, is also currently under fire in the US Subcommittee for lying to Congress about all things covid.

You might want to consider that.

I honestly have no clue what year that guy gets his info from.

The only thing that makes sense is that his confirmation bias is akin to a little islamic state within his 'brain', eradicating unwanted info, leaving his brain stuck in limbo somewhere between Jan 2020 and about Nov 2021. 

Nothing new is ever gonna stick, because it's all bad for him. 

[WestCanMan]

5 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

 ... but I resent the implication that I would not care about people involved in a grass roots movement.

You're shameless. 

[Michael Hardner]

9 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

You're shameless. 

? Well I posted THREE examples of expressing sympathy. 

I know that some get frustrated when people don't behave tribally on here.  Like when I call out ridiculous anti-Trudeau comments I get told that I LIKE him 😂

Like when I am hopeful about PP, while still thinking some of his tactics are silly, and that there's hypocrisy in some of his anti woke stuff.

People really can't understand that for some reason.

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

People really can't understand that for some reason.

Sure they can, they just don't want to.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

? Well I posted THREE examples of expressing sympathy. 

I know that some get frustrated when people don't behave tribally on here.  Like when I call out ridiculous anti-Trudeau comments I get told that I LIKE him 😂

Like when I am hopeful about PP, while still thinking some of his tactics are silly, and that there's hypocrisy in some of his anti woke stuff.

People really can't understand that for some reason.

I was going to let this go - but i think i've had enough. 

@Goddess was not far off the mark. 

You called them 'babies' here and say they only have themselves to blame for getting locked up

"Ridiculous. Convoy babies who couldn't work with their lawyers to get sprung on bail have themselves to blame."

 

babies

You frequently suggested that the convoy lacked principles 

"Meh... the 'truckers' demand a change in government based on 17% support of their vague cause. What exactly is the principle here ? I like popular uprisings, but principled ones..."

no principles

And thst was  a very common theme for your posts - "I like popular uprisings but this isn't popular so..." 

And you did in fact support the cbc's refering to the convoy as racisst. When people said you an't say the convoy is racist you would say that the leader sure is soooo is it really unfair for cbc to suggest others are? 

And i would guess that's where her impression comes from. You were pretty ok with the convoy being falsely accused of a lot of things from the looks of it 

To be completely fair I didn't see anywhere where you actually personally called them Nazis. Or racist or the like even though you kind of came close a few times. And you certainly spoke disparagingly of them on numerous occasions. But disparaging is not the same as accusing them of being Nazis or racists.

If you're going to do things like defend the CBC as labeling the entire Convoy as racist or suggesting that a large percentage of them might be then you are going to have to accept that people are going to believe that you agree with that assessment.

 

Quote

I know that some get frustrated when people don't behave tribally on here.  Like when I call out ridiculous anti-Trudeau comments I get told that I LIKE him

You frequently defend Trudeau when the comments against him are perfectly reasonable and utterly defended. And when you can't defend him you turn to the old "Why are we even talking about this" routine. 

 

Here's the thing Mike. It doesn't and dozens of people wind up having the same impression about you then it's probably not them, it's you.

[WestCanMan]

4 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

? Well I posted THREE examples of expressing sympathy. 

I know that some get frustrated when people don't behave tribally on here. 

FYI downplaying the fact that the PM denigrated/slandered a large group of people is the epitome of tribalism.

The fact that all of those people were slandered by Trudeau and the MSM over and over never phased you. You pretended to be aware of the symbols all over the crowd but you couldn't find any photos of the emperor's new clothes to back your claim.

If PP came out and made a broad accusation of racism against all women who got abortions or some such, I'd never pretend that it wasn't absurd and disgraceful, or to have some hidden knowledge that it's true.

[Michael Hardner]

7 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

1. FYI downplaying the fact that the PM denigrated/slandered a large group of people is the epitome of 

1. Hey buddy.   We went through this at least twice.  I called him out for this after I saw your clip.

[WestCanMan]

On 5/25/2024 at 9:00 AM, Michael Hardner said:

1. Hey buddy.   We went through this at least twice.  I called him out for this after I saw your clip.

Hey buddy, you were Trudeau's toadie when he was name-calling and hatemongering. Here ya go:

You were the first person to comment on that post - in defence of Trudeau - then you came back on P5 to downplay his hate speech against on p5 multiple times.

FWIW that disgusting little piece of shit has still never even apologized for it. 

Edited May 27, 2024 by WestCanMan

[Michael Hardner]

7 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Hey buddy, you were Trudeau's toadie when he was name-calling and hatemongering. Here ya go:

You were the first person to comment on that post - in defence of Trudeau - then you came back on P5 to downplay his hate speech against on p5 multiple times.

FWIW that disgusting little piece of shit has still never even apologized for it. 

Your memory fails you. We talked about it since then.

[eyeball]

On 5/24/2024 at 1:12 PM, Goddess said:

@eyeball  The NIH, run by Fauci, is also currently under fire in the US Subcommittee for lying to Congress about all things covid.

You might want to consider that.

Get back to me when Fauci has been charged with mass murder.

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Your memory fails you. We talked about it since then.

Your quote tells.

8 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Get back to me when Fauci has been charged with mass murder.

He has a fall guy, remember? Peter Daszak. 

He's the Kevin Clinesmith/Bill Morneau of covid.

Fauci will get charged when senior members of the FBI get charged. 

[Michael Hardner]

25 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

1. Your quote tells.

2. Fauci will get charged when senior members of the FBI get charged. 

1. The quote is from 2022.  8 think we talked about it THIS year.  Unless my memory is bad.

2. Is that a real prediction?  You made some about the 2020 election...

Edited May 27, 2024 by Michael Hardner