Jump to content

Is Government too bureaucratic and infringing on freedom of the citizens?


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

well I think Canada is one of those societies

and I do think the bureaucrats set the example that Canadians follow

the bureaucrats are not public servants in their minds

they are Mandarins, coteries to the powerful

their role is not to serve you, but rather dictate to you the arbitrary edicts of the government in power

I've worked in the bureaucracy and know all to well what they are.

Do a little experiment. Find a burger joint full of native Canadians and rate the service. Then go to a McDonald's and rate the service. Note the accents of the servers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

I've worked in the bureaucracy and know all to well what they are.

Do a little experiment. Find a burger joint full of native Canadians and rate the service. Then go to a McDonald's and rate the service. Note the accents of the servers. 

so you are blaming the immigrants for bad service ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nationalist said:

Do the experiment. See for yourself. 

why are you dodging the question ?

if you're a nativist, why not be loud & proud about it ?

have the courage of your convictions

I for one am not a nativist

I am British

British is not a race, British is not a place

the British Empire was majority Indian, Chinese, African & Arab

we British made those people British

like the Roman Empire, we are the Roma Britannia

so long as the immigrant embraces our system of governance, they are British

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

why are you dodging the question ?

if you're a nativist, why not be loud & proud about it ?

have the courage of your convictions

I for one am not a nativist

I am British

British is not a race, British is not a place

the British Empire was majority Indian, Chinese, African & Arab

we British made those people British

like the Roman Empire, we are the Roma Britannia

so long as the immigrant embraces our system of governance, they are British

Ah...but do they embrace our system? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Ah...but do they embrace our system? 

I find that the immigrants embrace our system more than the native born

the native born are increasingly Woke : anti-Western, anti-British

if that's being imported from somewhere, it's coming from America

if there is a cultural invasion, it's being led by upper middle class college educated white women

Edited by Dougie93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

I find that the immigrants embrace our system more than the native born

the native born are increasingly Woke : anti-Western, anti-British

if that's being imported from somewhere, it's coming from America

What's that got to do with "service"?

Been to get a passport lately?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/4/2022 at 6:35 PM, Nefarious Banana said:

Justin believes his own bullshit. Many on this forum/website also believe his bullshit and defend his delusional 'emperor like' manifestations. 

Justin Trudeau . . . 1/2 leader of the smallest minority government in Canadian history. We should be so proud.

I am pretty sure that there are not "many" that defend Trudeau. There are some here that contest the blatherings of a few here that go too far in their diatribes.

I am quite certain that many here are aware of the shortcomings of Trudeau but, whether you like to say smallest minority r not, enough Canadians voted for him to be the PM.

No sitting government has had admiration by all citizens. Perhaps we should be whining that there are no real leaders in Canada, regardless of party, to lead and run this country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

so you are scapegoating immigrants for the delays at the passport office

I don't find any evidence of that

I'm not scapegoating anybody. I'm saying that "service" in many other societies, has a negative connotation and it shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

The best kind. Personal experience.

you're of course welcome to your opinion, but anecdote is not evidence in proof of argument

in terms of the McDonald's experiment, I do often get coffee at McDonald's

I can't say I've encountered rude service at any McDonald's ever

and if I ever complain at McDonald's

they are invariably very apologetic and scurry around trying to fix the problem

Edited by Dougie93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

The best kind. Personal experience.

anecdotal evidence is the not the best kind of evidence

it's the worst

especially when the person interpreting the anecdotal evidence is as biased against immigrants as you are

confirmation bias is a helluva drug

small sample size for the fail

Edited by Yzermandius19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

in terms of anecdote, my experience is that most immigrants I encounter in this context are business owners

they came here to start a business, usually a family business

they are all in, they have no safety net

so they tend to be the most business oriented, providing some of the best service

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

anecdotal evidence is the not the best kind of evidence

it's the worst

especially when the person interpreting the anecdotal evidence is as biased against immigrants as you are

confirmation bias is a helluva drug

small sample size for the fail

You can keep telling yourself that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

You can keep telling yourself that.

it's logic which dictates

anecdote is inherently fallacious

doesn't it mean it's not true, it's just not proof of anything

argument is to prove something

thus argument by anecdote is an inherently weak position

our brains are lazy by nature, trying to conserve energy

anecdote over proof is intellectual laziness, because your brain would rather do that instead of research

Edited by Dougie93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dougie93 said:

it's logic which dictates

anecdote is inherently fallacious

doesn't it mean it's not true, it's just not proof of anything

argument is to prove something

thus argument by anecdote is an inherently weak position

our brains are lazy by nature, trying to conserve energy

anecdote over proof is intellectual laziness, because your brain would rather do that instead of research

I know what my senses tell me. I'm not big on "Don't believe your eyes, believe what we tell you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,722
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    phoenyx75
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • User went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • User went up a rank
      Contributor
    • User earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Fluffypants earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...