Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Obama likes Trudeau and Obama knows Canadian like them some Obama, so Obama endorsing Trudeau will help him get re-elected and overcome the blackface sh*t if Canada's favorite living black politician still likes him. Pretty straight forward.

Edited by Yzermandius19
  • Like 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

Obama likes Trudeau and Obama knows Canadian like them some Obama, so Obama endorsing Trudeau will help him get re-elected and overcome the blackface sh*t if Canada's favorite living black politician still likes him. Pretty straight forward.

 

Seems like that if it happened to Trump, certain folks would be screaming about election meddling.

:rolleyes:

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

Seems like that if it happened to Trump, certain folks would be screaming about election meddling.

:rolleyes:

Oh Indeed. The Trump Haters will grasp at any straw they can to try and hurt Trump, no matter how dumb it makes them look, they won't notice with their massive blinders preventing them from seeing an obvious double standard.

Edited by Yzermandius19
  • Like 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said:

A 'do-nothing' President endorsing a 'dip-shit' PM . . . . . are they blood relatives ?

Anything is possible! A brother from a different mother?

Posted
1 minute ago, Yzermandius19 said:

Oh Indeed. The Trump Haters will grasp at any straw they can to try and hurt Trump, no matter how dumb it makes them look especially when they look the other way when someone they like does it instead.

 

Can you imagine the headline? "President of Ukraine endorses Trump's re-election bid."

Not without several references to being a traitor and needing impeachment thrown-in, you can't!

:lol:

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

Can you imagine the headline? "President of Ukraine endorses Trump's re-election bid."

Not without several references to being a traitor and needing impeachment thrown-in, you can't!

:lol:

Collusion! Collusion! Collusion!

Keep playing into Trump's hands and giving him free press to chase the page clicks and views by pushing sensationalist bullsh*t that Trump has been a master of handling ever since he became famous, silly lamestream media. 

More lulz in my life for the win.

Edited by Yzermandius19
Posted

Obama isn't president anymore, so it's not an issue. Private citizens are free to say what they want.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

Obama isn't president anymore, so it's not an issue. Private citizens are free to say what they want.

Free speech is not only for people who aren't POTUS. The POTUS can say what he wants too.
/shrugs

Stop with the double standards already. If Obama was still POTUS, you wouldn't care, and would see the double standard. You only use that lame excuse because Trump is currently POTUS and you are reaching for an angle to attack him. If a politician you liked was in office, you would see the hypocrisy of his haters claiming the POTUS doesn't have free speech and everyone else does.

Edited by Yzermandius19
Posted
1 minute ago, BubberMiley said:

Obama isn't president anymore, so it's not an issue. Private citizens are free to say what they want.

Well I know that but it is still odd ? I am thinking this will backfire. It seems desperate.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

It would backfire if Canadians didn't like Obama, but they do, so it will help Trudeau.

Well we will know the answer in 4 more days :)

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Teena said:

Well we will know the answer in 4 more days :)

Trudeau will win. The Anything But Conservative Vote will back the Liberals out of fear Scheer will win, especially with the polls as close as they are. If they don't though, that would be hilarious.

Edited by Yzermandius19
Posted
12 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

Headline: "Ex-President of Ukraine endorses Trump for second term."

We all know what CNN would do...

No you don't. After the whole collusion narrative, you never understood what was going on deeply enough to know there's a difference between foreign citizens and foreign governments? 

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

No you don't. After the whole collusion narrative, you never understood what was going on deeply enough to know there's a difference between foreign citizens and foreign governments? 

The whole collusion narrative was bullsh*t, all we learned is that the media doesn't know what collusion is, and will grasp at straws to claim any innocuous thing is collusion, when collusion isn't even a crime.

Womp Womp.

Edited by Yzermandius19
  • Like 2
Posted

I think it's clear you don't know what collusion is if you don't know the relevance of whether someone is a foreign citizen or a foreign government.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

I think it's clear you don't know what collusion is if you don't know the relevance of whether someone is a foreign citizen or a foreign government.

Collusion isn't a crime.

Free speech is not collusion.

Foreign government officials are foreign citizens. 

Grasp at some more straws.

Edited by Yzermandius19
Posted

Working with foreign citizens who are foreign government officials to influence an election is a crime. A foreign private citizen standing on his own soil and saying who he would like to win a foreign election is not a crime.

Amazing I just have to state basic, obvious information to win these debates. It takes no effort at all. :lol:

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted
2 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

Working with foreign citizens who are foreign government officials to influence an election is a crime. A foreign private citizen standing on his own soil and saying who he would like to win a foreign election is not a crime.

Amazing I just have to state basic, obvious information to win these debates. It takes no effort at all. :lol:

Influencing an election isn't a crime. Only certain kinds of influence on a foreign election are a crime, and that crime isn't collusion, because collusion isn't a crime. You thinking you are winning is causing you to double down on derp, keep the lulz coming.

Posted

I'll say it again because it remains true: Working with foreign citizens who are foreign government officials to influence an election is a crime. 

 

  • Sad 1
"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

I'll say it again because it remains true: Working with foreign citizens who are foreign government officials to influence an election is a crime. 

 

Not necessarily. Depends on what you mean by "influence". Getting oppo research on your political opponents is not a crime.

Edited by Yzermandius19
  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

I'll say it again because it remains true: Working with foreign citizens who are foreign government officials to influence an election is a crime. 

 

Under what statute?  Chapter and verse, quote it for us.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...