Jump to content

Americans are frightened


Recommended Posts

American analysts are anxiously watching the strengthening of the forces of the Russian army, which has been happening in recent years. The Russian fleet got at its disposal the «Caliber» cruise missile, which confirmed its capabilities during real combat firing at terrorist targets in Syria. Also the new «Zircon» hypersonic anti-ship missile, which can be used from launchers for «Onyx and Caliber» complexes, is going to appear in the fleet service. The National Interest, also, noted the power of the Russian «Poseidon» project of an unmanned underwater vehicle with a nuclear power plant on board. All this, along with the expansion of the geopolitical influence of Moscow, forces the Pentagon and the White House administration to closely monitor changes in the military sphere of Russia. For more details: https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/russias-military-transforming-and-getting-stronger-right-our-eyes-67907

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Zircon is a long way from being in service, if ever.

Mr. Ivan doesn't have the cash to produce any of these new Wunderwaffen in any quantity.

Zircon at this juncture remains and experimental prototype and totally unproven therein.

3M-54 Kalibr is nothing special, basically a Russian TLAM

P-800 Oniks is more formidable, but the old Soviet P-700 Granit remains the most formidable anti-shipping missile on earth.

Mach 1.5 - 3.0 out to 380 nautical miles, can deliver 1600 lbs of high explosive, or be fitted with a 500 kiloton thermonuclear warhead.

In terms of underwater, like Zircon, Status-6 Oceanic Multipurpose System 'Poseidon" remains experimental.

None the less, Ivan has been capable of delivering nuclear torpedoes against coastal targets since 1958.

Fact is, the Balance of Terror is a stalemate in terms of firepower, so Ivan really only has one card to play in terms of intimidation.

It's called Escalation Dominance.  Escalating beyond the point where NATO would wish to go.

I would suggest an all out invasion of east Ukraine to the Dnepr while securing the flank with the 1st Guards Tank Army into Belarus on the Suwalki Gap.

Deploy INF in situ under battlefield command, for nuclear deescalation.

In terms of spooking the Americans, send ballistic missile submarines to park off the CONUS in a counterforce launch profile and conduct missile drills.

Back that up by resuming live fire nuclear tests, just to demonstrate resolve,  and that the current warheads are fully functioning.

Operation Crazy Ivan, stage up through a series of reckless wanton escalations towards the brink of war without warning nor explanation.

Edited by Dougie93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, J4L said:

America is the only military superpower.  It would annihilate Russia if the two were to go to war. 

There's only one civilization and it would be annihilated if the two engaged in a nuclear war.

Quote

America is NOT scared of Russia.

That's scary.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, eyeball said:

There's only one civilization and it would be annihilated if the two engaged in a nuclear war.

Nah, there's not that many weapons on alert anymore, back in 1983 at the peak, with 25,000 warheads on alert, that would have been a civilization destroying event.

At this juncture, the Russians and Americans only have a combined 4000 or so warheads on alert. 

So it would be devastating in the northern hemisphere, but civilization would carry on.

By my calculations,  the optimal place to be, in terms of remote from the war zone,  yet civilized with ample resources, and safe from fallout, would be Ciudad del Este in Paraguay. 

It's really only Australia and New Zealand which the Russians would hit in the Southern Hemisphere, but the prevailing winds actually carry that fallout the other way out into the Indian Ocean, so South America would be quite safe.

Edited by Dougie93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also bear in mind that the media exaggerates the effects of thermonuclear weapons, they're more survivable than the public surmises. 

There is an effects radius, and a fallout plume, but those are finite and if you're not inside that area, and you didn't look at the flash, you're fine.

Even if you are in the effects radius, if are you in shelter, even just inside a house, you're likely to survive. 

The biggest warheads the Russians use now, are 800Kt, and the majority of their warheads are only 200Kt.

They don't deploy the huge multimegaton warheads that they did back in the 80's, so not just fewer bombs, but smaller bombs too.

So Cold War Two is not yet reached the threshold of annihilation that Cold War One did.

On the other hand, that does make an exchange more likely in Cold War Two, particularly as Ballistic Missile Defense improves as we go.

In fact,  it is those very anti-ballistic missiles which are inciting Cold War Two.

Ballistic Missile Defense vs Intermediate Nuclear Forces.

An exchange over the pole between Russia and the CONUS directly remains an unlikely scenario.

Much more likely to be a theater thermonuclear war in Europe.

With the Russians declining to invoke massive retaliation by attacking the Americans, British, or French directly. 

Instead only using nuclear weapons on countries which do not posses nuclear weapons. Poland, Ukraine and Romania being the most likely targets.

As it is unlikely that the Americans, British nor French would retaliate on behalf of other countries, when it was the Russians they had to retaliate against.

The Soviets also had this policy, don't nuke the Americans, British nor French, and you can get away with nuking everybody else.

These supposed "Deterrent Umbrellas" of the Americans are not real and Mr. Ivan knows it, Washington is not really willing to get nuked for Warsaw.

From the Baltic down through Ukraine and the Balkans, across the Black Sea to the Caucasus, that's the warzone.

Ivan is not likely to nuke Paris, but he will fight for the Near Abroad if he is backed into a corner.

The Americans, British and French have the least to be afraid of, because they are the safest, as the consequences of attacking them are suicidal.

If the Russians nuke America, it will be by mistake, a false alarm wherein they believed the Americans were attacking them first.

That is most likely to happen when tensions are at the brink of war.

Because the Russians wouldn't believe the Americans would attack them out of the blue for nothing.

If the Russians were however at the brink with the Americans, that's where the fog of war comes into play and you could get an interpolar exchange.

In the event of, by the lack of targets in vicinity and the fallout patterns, the safest place to be in North America is Eugene Oregon.

No, Canada is not actually a safe place to be, most of Canada is right in the plumes from the CONUS, the prevailing winds will spread the fallout across Canada.

In Cold War terms, Canada is No Man's Land between the Americans and Russians and Canada is expendable, so Canada is gonna get it bad.

As there are much fewer warheads now, I don't think the Russians would waste that many on Canada, it's the fallout that will get Canada.

Most of Canada is just downwind from some of the biggest targets of them all, Kitsap Washington, the Great Plains, Chicago, and so on.

Edited by Dougie93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/6/2019 at 11:33 AM, Dougie93 said:

The Zircon is a long way from being in service, if ever.

Mr. Ivan doesn't have the cash to produce any of these new Wunderwaffen in any quantity.

Zircon at this juncture remains and experimental prototype and totally unproven therein.

3M-54 Kalibr is nothing special, basically a Russian TLAM

P-800 Oniks is more formidable, but the old Soviet P-700 Granit remains the most formidable anti-shipping missile on earth.

Mach 1.5 - 3.0 out to 380 nautical miles, can deliver 1600 lbs of high explosive, or be fitted with a 500 kiloton thermonuclear warhead.

In terms of underwater, like Zircon, Status-6 Oceanic Multipurpose System 'Poseidon" remains experimental.

None the less, Ivan has been capable of delivering nuclear torpedoes against coastal targets since 1958.

Fact is, the Balance of Terror is a stalemate in terms of firepower, so Ivan really only has one card to play in terms of intimidation.

It's called Escalation Dominance.  Escalating beyond the point where NATO would wish to go.

I would suggest an all out invasion of east Ukraine to the Dnepr while securing the flank with the 1st Guards Tank Army into Belarus on the Suwalki Gap.

Deploy INF in situ under battlefield command, for nuclear deescalation.

In terms of spooking the Americans, send ballistic missile submarines to park off the CONUS in a counterforce launch profile and conduct missile drills.

Back that up by resuming live fire nuclear tests, just to demonstrate resolve,  and that the current warheads are fully functioning.

Operation Crazy Ivan, stage up through a series of reckless wanton escalations towards the brink of war without warning nor explanation.

Sorry, but who is that mr. Ivan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/4/2019 at 8:24 PM, basilone_john said:

American analysts are anxiously watching the strengthening of the forces of the Russian army, which has been happening in recent years. The Russian fleet got at its disposal the «Caliber» cruise missile, which confirmed its capabilities during real combat firing at terrorist targets in Syria. Also the new «Zircon» hypersonic anti-ship missile, which can be used from launchers for «Onyx and Caliber» complexes, is going to appear in the fleet service. The National Interest, also, noted the power of the Russian «Poseidon» project of an unmanned underwater vehicle with a nuclear power plant on board. All this, along with the expansion of the geopolitical influence of Moscow, forces the Pentagon and the White House administration to closely monitor changes in the military sphere of Russia. For more details: https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/russias-military-transforming-and-getting-stronger-right-our-eyes-67907

It ain't going to happen, pardner. Both know that it would be pretty much game over and the possible end of life on  earth if they both started sending nuclear weapons towards each other.  There has always been this threat that one day Russia and America will battle it out. Some warmongers in America need a bogeyman and Russia and Putin is that bogeyman. I believe that Trump and Putin are friends and are on the same page. I do not fear Russia but I do fear communist China. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of Zircon, Zircon is part of a larger arms race between what is called Hypersonics.

There are two types, Hypersonic Glide Vehicles (HGV) which are launched by ballistic missiles like MIRV's, but come in at a lower angle of attack and maneuvering rather than parabolic.

The other type is Hypersonic Cruise Missiles (HCM) which Zircon is an experimental prototype of,

America, China and Russia are all in this arms race, which is next generation rocket science, because these weapons are very expensive and tricky to make work, so only the Americans, Chinese and Russians are in the race at this juncture.

It's not the case that Russia has a significant lead in the race, because of the three the Russians have the least money available for the development and production of these next generation Intermediate Nuclear Forces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/4/2019 at 8:24 PM, basilone_john said:

American analysts are anxiously watching the strengthening of the forces of the Russian army, which has been happening in recent years. The Russian fleet got at its disposal the «Caliber» cruise missile, which confirmed its capabilities during real combat firing at terrorist targets in Syria. Also the new «Zircon» hypersonic anti-ship missile, which can be used from launchers for «Onyx and Caliber» complexes, is going to appear in the fleet service. The National Interest, also, noted the power of the Russian «Poseidon» project of an unmanned underwater vehicle with a nuclear power plant on board. All this, along with the expansion of the geopolitical influence of Moscow, forces the Pentagon and the White House administration to closely monitor changes in the military sphere of Russia. For more details: https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/russias-military-transforming-and-getting-stronger-right-our-eyes-67907

Yeah, but, really:

0053_defense_comparison.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By Regina
      The Canadian Government is planning to waste at least $235 million for a project, The Thirty Meter Telescope, which won't even be built on Canadian soil.  The Thirty Meter Telescope most likely will employ few Canadians.  To make matters worse, the telescope will be built in Hawaii, USA on land which is both environmentally and religiously sensitive to the indigenous Hawaiians.  I hope everybody will protest against the waste of tax money and human rights abuses.  Please sign the petition to stop the injustice happening within the USA at the expense of Canadian taxpayers.  I am posting a link to an online petition against the Thirty Meter Telescope and waste of taxpayer money: https://www.change.org/p/justin-trudeau-a-call-to-divest-canada-s-research-funding-for-the-thirty-meter-telescope-on-mauna-kea
      Please tell your friends to sign the petition too.  Thank you for your time.
    • By Hussain
      Im currently a grade 12 student who started an Initiative to Inform Youth about Politics and World Issues. 
      I started this podcast in the summer of 2019 after seeing the lack of attention being given to the Canadain  election of 2019. My older friends were not voting, and if they were voting, they voted without the proper knowledge. That led me to create this podcast where I try to inform the youth about world issues and politics, and hopefully encourage them to vote. 
      CHECK IT OUT HERE & TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK
       
    • By mazerunner
      The melting ice of Greenland will soon reveal the dirty secrets of the Camp Century military base built by the Americans in Denmark during the Cold War. Then it was assumed that the secrets of this place would be buried forever under snow and ice, along with nuclear and toxic waste. But now the «canned» base with hundreds of thousands of liters of fuel, radioactive refrigerant and toxic substances has begun to thaw. The rapid ice melting means that in a few decades these substances will appear on the surface, exposing a serious environmental disaster.
      The «Camp Century» base was developed in 1959 to deploy ballistic missiles within the reach of the USSR. The project was called an «Ice Worm».
      According to the Pentagon, it was planned to conduct in Greenland ice sheet a system of 2500 miles long tunnels and deploy about 600 «Iceman» intercontinental ballistic missiles in it, aimed at the USSR. These missiles were supposed to be a modernization of the «Minuteman» missiles (a shortened two-stage version), their flight range was estimated at 3800 miles, while they had to carry a 2.4 megaton warhead in TNT equivalent. The missiles were planned to be placed in tunnels under the ice, while the ice was supposed to protect the missiles from detection and complicate the process of their destruction.
      It was planned to lay a network of tunnels that were scooped in an ice shell like trenches, followed by arched ceiling. The tunnels were supposed to interconnect the launch complexes with missiles located at a distance of about 4 miles, with at least one meter of ice above them.
      Between the launch complexes, the missiles were supposed to move on special small trains. The tunnels network and launching sites should have been managed from 60 command centers. In total, 11 thousand people were planned to be involved in servicing the complex.
      In the process, 21 tunnels with a total length of 3000 m were laid. In the small town under the ice was created all the necessary infrastructure for life and work. There were built presidential houses, kitchens and dining rooms, showers, toilets, lounges, a library, a shop, a theater, a 10-bed hospital, an operating room, a laundry room, a cold warehouse for food, a research laboratory, a communications center, a nuclear power station, an administrative building, and a hairdresser, diesel-electric power plant and water storage tank, there was even their own chapel.
      The «Camp Century» military base lasted until 1966, when it became apparent that the «Ice Worm» project was impossible to implement, so the Greenland ice won. Back in 1962, it was discovered that the ice movements on the island significantly exceed the calculated values.
      Identified features and reduced funding for the project led to the fact that in 1963 the nuclear reactor was stopped and dismantled, and in 1966 the military completely left the camp. Observation over the camp was still ongoing for several years, until in 1969, ice and snow almost completely consumed all the erected premises. The place was abandoned and the Americans simply left, giving the snow the opportunity to hide their tracks.
      The «Ice Worm» project has not been mentioned for decades. For the first time this became known only in 1997 when the Danish Parliament commissioned the Danish Institute for Foreign Policy to study the history of nuclear weapons using in Greenland in connection with the scandal over the plane crash over the American base of Thule, located in the north-west of Greenland.
      In 2016, scientists working on the global warming issue found that its consequences led to a thinning of Greenland ice layer, and to a slow melting of those tunnels that were built by the U.S. military. In this regard, melting ice in this area is a threat to the ecology of the island. Radioactive waste that poses the greatest danger may appear on the surface. For a long time, the United States ignored the information that during the implementation of the «Ice Worm» project, there had been produced about 200 tons of radioactive water, which merged right into the ice cap of Greenland. Moreover, at a depth of about 40 m and at an area of a hundred football fields, nine thousand tons of various materials lurk - bunkers, railway rails, tanks with diesel fuel and radioactive coolant, as well as an unknown amount of extremely toxic polychlorinated biphenyls, which are extremely dangerous for health and the environment.
      Undoubtedly, scientists are especially worried about tanks with chemicals buried in tunnels, that naturally accumulate in colder conditions and can penetrate into the most unexpected places. In the Arctic has already been noted the dangerous toxin levels in the indigenous population, which eats seals and whales’ meat.
      According to scientists, a decrease in the amount of ice can reach critical values by about 2090, when the negative effects of harmful substances from the «Ice Worm» can no longer be reversed. As for melt water, it will reach the bunkers of the former American base and its dangerous contents much earlier, and then the streams will carry the «American legacy» into the ocean.
      Today it may seem that if scientists believe that several more decades will pass before the melting of the ice causes a possible chemical or radiation disaster, then there is still time to clean up the territory. However, the cleaning up process of the base`s heritage can also take quite a long period of time. At the same time, the USA and Denmark have not yet agreed on a work plan. Formally, at present, the base remains the property of the US military, but it is still not clear who exactly should clean up the waste. Both countries refuse to allocate budget funds for a time-consuming project, and also do not take risks for its implementation.
      Meanwhile, when the Arctic as a whole, and Greenland in particular, is facing an environmental disaster, the United States, which refuses to cleanse the island of the results of its activities during the Cold War, is again interested in this island. This time, the Americans are trying to raise the issue of buying the largest island in the world, which is of tremendous strategic importance, given its position in the Arctic.
       
    • By Jean Jacques
      Is it okay to protest at a high level against the fact that a country, in order to protect its people, is strengthening the defense of its borders? I am talking about Japanese protests against Russia's strengthening of the defense of its Far East.

      Tokyo constantly protests against any Russian activity on its own territory, and these protests have already become a habit. The stubbornness and new White Paper will not help the Japanese leadership to “return” the islands, because Moscow has repeatedly proved the groundlessness of these territorial claims and stated directly that they have no any plans to transfer the islands.
      So what are our samurai friends waiting for? Maybe support of America in a military resolving of the issue?
  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...