Jump to content

Why all the worldwide turmoil? (9/11 thread)


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Argus said:

FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength—and that required exposure to much less heat.Apr 7, 2010  http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center/

Soft as butter...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzF1KySHmUA

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Altai said:


There is an easy way to understand it. Someones should prepare small models of TTowers and we should animate the event again. 

That has been done, for WTC7 but in a more limited fashion than you envision, Altai. 

The professor, a PhD and his doctoral students, focused on NISTs suggested cause of collapse, a column failure [79]. They went as far towards NIST's position, ie. gave the benefit of the doubt, erred in favor of NIST and the result, as you all know by now, the chance of NIST's story being true is zero. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hot enough said:

That has been done, for WTC7 but in a more limited fashion than you envision, Altai. 

The professor, a PhD and his doctoral students, focused on NISTs suggested cause of collapse, a column failure [79]. They went as far towards NIST's position, ie. gave the benefit of the doubt, erred in favor of NIST and the result, as you all know by now, the chance of NIST's story being true is zero. 

 

What is known as: Argument From Authority. A type of logical fallacy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

What is known as: Argument From Authority. A type of logical fallacy.

You don't understand what you have advanced. And yet, your post before this, you put forward a you tube video as an authority. Do you not see the logical disconnect? Folks have offered Popular Mechanics as experts. They are most assuredly not.

"Argument from authority

An argument from authority, also called an appeal to authority, is a common type of argument which can be fallacious, such as when an authority is cited on a topic outside their area of expertise or when the authority cited is not a true expert."

Dr Leroy Hulsey is an expert in his field. You could have done this simple bit of research yourself.

http://cem.uaf.edu/cee/people/leroy-hulsey.aspx

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hot enough said:

Okay, I just checked your link. I am familiar with that video. And I'm willing to discuss your expert's ideas on how 911 happened. Let's get 'er on!

 

I chat with crazy ol' Buzz online all the time. I'm pretty sure he actually went to the Moon. If not, he really is crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hot enough said:

Are you saying you don't understand the blacksmith's points or you can't explain the blacksmith's points? 

I think LCROSS pretty much put to bed the last vestiges of the Moon Hoaxers.

Question though: did the Battle of Midway happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, hot enough said:

Are you saying you don't understand the blacksmith's points or you can't explain the blacksmith's points? 

I think he's saying you can tell the blacksmith wasn't on the Moon, because the shadows are the wrong shape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folks, come on, please. 

 

Forum rule:

If you are not bringing anything new to the argument, then do not say anything at all.
Some messages are not so much offensive as simply nuisance value. An example would be a person who persistently creates conflict without contributing anything useful. 

Edited by hot enough
edit out unnecessary rule comments
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

Because nothing new on the topic has been presented in this thread.   

 

 

 

 

The UofA-F study is new. It shows the NIST/US official conspiracy theory is not only wrong, but evil. Consider the implications of this revelation that the alleged hijackers are innocent. 

Don't you think it's evil to bear false witness against innocent people?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hot enough said:

The entire 911 issue and all the resulting world conflict, world problems, "radical Islam", everything bear on this one single point, Betsy. 

1. The only fuel that was available to the alleged hijackers was jet fuel and office furnishings. They have a MAXIMUM burning temperature of 1,800F, in ideal burn conditions. There were not ideal burn conditions. US official conspiracy theory folks describe maximum burn temps in the twin towers as being around 1,400F.

2. Melting points/vaporization points

a. steel - 2,800F

b. molybdenum [Mo] 4,700F

c. vaporized steel 5,000+F

d. iron, about the same as steel

So, the only fuels available to the alleged hijackers was 1,400 degrees F short of being able to melt steel. There was molten steel, much of it, reported by many people. There are videos of the Meterorite, the famous one and there are others. These are fused agglomerations of molten steel and concrete. It is not possible that the alleged hijackers melted those metals. 

The only logical conclusion one can draw from that is that the alleged hijackers had nothing to do with the collapse of WTCs 1, 2 and 7. They have been falsely accused.

The most important implication that comes to mind [there are hundreds and hundreds of very serious implications] is, who then could have melted all those metals and caused the collapse of the three towers.

 

Read the rebuttal from the article I gave.

 

You stated:

 

Quote

In a word, they have been falsely accused.

 

Again, I'm asking you:  who are they that have been falsely accused? 

Edited by betsy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, betsy said:

 

Read the rebuttal from the article I gave.

 

AND BTW, answer this question that I've asked you:  who is falsely accused? 

I'm completely familiar with Popular Mechanics. There is no rebuttal in that material, Betsy. It is old and it was not accurate to begin with. If you would like to bring forward any point for discussion, I would be happy to explain it to you. 

I must have thought you were joking. I'm shocked that you don't know who has been falsely accused. Have you ever read anything about 911? 

Edited by hot enough
clearer explanation
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, hot enough said:

If you think that the US official conspiracy theory is so strong, discuss those issues that you believe have merit. 

 

Why ?   That would just be repeating the many past discussions on the topic in this forum ?

What has changed since then ?  This forum's archive is full of such content if that is what you seek.

Lot's of other, more current "turmoil" is available from around the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hot enough said:

I'm completely familiar with Popular Mechanics. There is no rebuttal in that material, Betsy. It is old and it was not accurate to begin with. If you would like to bring forward any point for discussion, I would be happy to explain it to you.

Yep.  You've been rebutted!

 

 

Quote

I'm shocked that you don't know who has been falsely accused. Have you ever read anything about 911? 

Never mind feeling shocked about my question.   I ask for a clear answer.  You're in a forum.

 

Who do you think are they, that have been falsely accused? 

and........

Falsely accused of what????

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Why ?  

What has changed since then ? 

Lot's of other, more current "turmoil" is available from around the world.

A new study, that will see formal release in the Spring of this year. That is new.  

All the "Lot's of other, more current "turmoil"" is turmoil that has been occasioned by the evil lies perpetrated by the real criminals on September 11, 2001. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hot enough said:

A new study, that will see formal release in the Spring of this year. That is new.  

All the "Lot's of other, more current "turmoil"" is turmoil that has been occasioned by the evil lies perpetrated by the real criminals on September 11, 2001. 

 

 

Really ?    The world anxiously waits for more Truther red meat.    

Lies are lies...evil or otherwise.  Get use to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, Betsy. Let's give it one last try. The NIST study [do you know who NIST is and what they studied?] has been shown to be false by an in depth scientific study. Not just questions raised about the study - it has a zero chance of being true. The US government official conspiracy theory rests totally [=100%] on that study. If NIST lied about WTC7, and they most certainly did, then they lied about WTCs 1 & 2.  

A few examples; NIST lied about molten metals; they lied about explosions; they lied, and still lie about molten aluminum. [it's on their website FAQs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,712
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    nyralucas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...