Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I  will be very surprised if they do not come to their senses and drop the charges.  It was probably a knee jerk reaction by some subordinate somewhere. 

I hope so anyway.  I've been to Denmark.  It has nice castles, but it is no longer a medieval country.  Or so I thought.

Posted
2 hours ago, bcsapper said:

I  will be very surprised if they do not come to their senses and drop the charges.  It was probably a knee jerk reaction by some subordinate somewhere. 

I hope so anyway.  I've been to Denmark.  It has nice castles, but it is no longer a medieval country.  Or so I thought.

 

Seems likely, they don't have a history of really pursuing such cases.   

Posted

LoL, this is nice. But 46 years is a bit over exaggerated. He should clean public toilets for a month. 

"You cant ask people about their belief, its none of your business, its between them and their God but you have to ask them whether or not they need something or they have a problem to be solved." Ottoman Sultan, Mehmed The Conqueror

"We are not intended to conquer someone's lands but we want to conquer hearts." Ottoman Sultan, Mehmed The Conqueror

Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, Altai said:

LoL, this is nice. But 46 years is a bit over exaggerated.

You didn't read the entire article. He has been charged, not convicted. The 46 years is the time since the last charge under this code, not his sentence. If you go further down you will see: The maximum sentence for blasphemy is four months in prison but Mr Reckendorff said prosecutors were more likely to seek a fine.

Personally I think he should be denounced and mocked.

Edited by ?Impact
Posted
2 hours ago, ?Impact said:

You didn't read the entire article. He has been charged, not convicted. The 46 years is the time since the last charge under this code, not his sentence. If you go further down you will see: The maximum sentence for blasphemy is four months in prison but Mr Reckendorff said prosecutors were more likely to seek a fine.

Personally I think he should be denounced and mocked.

That's what I think too.  Someone should pen a strongly worded letter to an editor somewhere.

Posted
12 hours ago, bcsapper said:

Yeah, I know.  They just haven't applied the makeup and the red nose in a while.

Oh, but they have, in much, much more comical fashion. Not saying anything about the terrorist actions of western nations is the new, strictly prohibited blasphemy.

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, hot enough said:

Oh, but they have, in much, much more comical fashion. Not saying anything about the terrorist actions of western nations is the new, strictly prohibited blasphemy.

Could you provide me with a list of those charged in such cases?  Aren't you afraid?  You just mentioned it.

Edited by bcsapper
Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it at the circus - Not Blaise Pascal

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...