Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Even though its legal to burn the flag in the US, do u think ANY country should allow this to happen?   Myself, I think anyone who burns their flag really doesn't love their country because IF these person are so angry with their country, they are committing arson, they should go to jail. Thoughts?

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Freedom of expression is guaranteed by the Constitution. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this issue.  It's over. Evidentally the poorly informed president-elect missed his Grade 10 Civics class so he wasn't aware, but I think there is going to be a lot of that.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted

Myself, I think anyone who tears up the Constitution really doesn't love their country. Should we send Donald Trump to jail for trying to destroy the first amendment? Should we send Donald Trump to jail for trying to make American citizens stateless, which is contrary to international agreements and human rights?

Posted

I never could understand the whole flag burning argument.  Land of the free, except where flags are concerned?  Of course one should be allowed to burn a flag. 

As long as no-one is wearing it.

Posted

1) Maybe those 2nd amendment people could take care of the 1st amendment people, I mean, maybe, I don't know. 

2) Once Trump replaces Scalia then this will all be "automatic." 

3) Oh, wait, Scalia was a 1ster: http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2016/02/13/scalia-burning-flag-piers-intv.cnn/video/playlists/supreme-court-justice-antonin-scalia-dead/

4) Next thing you know, cartoons of a certain prophet will be banned too....

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Posted
14 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

 

As long as no-one is wearing it.

Well, if it is being worn by a Buddhist with a point to prove then good luck stopping it. 

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, ?Impact said:

Myself, I think anyone who tears up the Constitution really doesn't love their country.

Lots of things suck about our constitution. As an example, there is no equivalent to the first amendment in the USA. Burning the constitution or the flag to protest things wrong with our country can be completely justified.

Edited by -1=e^ipi
Posted
10 minutes ago, -1=e^ipi said:

Lots of things suck about our constitution. As an example, there is no equivalent to the first amendment in the USA. Burning the constitution or the flag to protest things wrong with our country can be completely justified.

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

  • (a) freedom of conscience and religion;

  • (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;

  • (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and

  • (d) freedom of association.

 

2(b) is good enough.  

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Posted

Section 2 is restricted by section 1 of the charter.

 

  1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

 

That's why we have hate speech laws, and you get cases like the gregory allen eliot trial. Or you have human rights tribunals go after people that publish cartoons of the charter of rights and freedoms.

 

Section 1 of the charter should be abolished. The preamble as well as section 15 subsection 2 should also be abolished.

Posted

The horror, the horror. 

None of which prevents anyone from burning a Canadian flag if they wanted to. 

Or, prevents anonymous people on the internet from whining incessantly about these types of things. 

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Posted
1 hour ago, bcsapper said:

I never could understand the whole flag burning argument.  Land of the free, except where flags are concerned?  Of course one should be allowed to burn a flag. 

As long as no-one is wearing it.

 

Proper disposal of a U.S. flag is by burning.   Much ado about nothing.  

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
38 minutes ago, msj said:

The horror, the horror. 

None of which prevents anyone from burning a Canadian flag if they wanted to. 

Or, prevents anonymous people on the internet from whining incessantly about these types of things. 

Well that's a nice bait and switch tactic.

 

I was responding to the claim that Canada does have an equivalent to the first amendment, we do not. I never claimed that flag burning was illegal. Flag burning is fine, just don't disagree with feminists on twitter or depict the prophet mohammed.

Posted

Such behaviors like as burning flags or burning someone's posters or insulting people is an outburst of violence impulses within someone and give us signals that these persons are prone to commit crimes if they would have a chance. It should not be allowed. 

"You cant ask people about their belief, its none of your business, its between them and their God but you have to ask them whether or not they need something or they have a problem to be solved." Ottoman Sultan, Mehmed The Conqueror

"We are not intended to conquer someone's lands but we want to conquer hearts." Ottoman Sultan, Mehmed The Conqueror

Posted
1 minute ago, Altai said:

Such behaviors like as burning flags or burning someone's posters or insulting people is an outburst of violence impulses within someone and give us signals that these persons are prone to commit crimes if they would have a chance. It should not be allowed. 

No it doesn't.  It's a protest.  It's a non-violent act.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, The_Squid said:

No it doesn't.  It's a protest.  It's a non-violent act.

 


"Protest" means to express your disagreement with someones while burning flags is simulation and a small practice of destroying/killing something which calls people to act violent under the conscious.

"You cant ask people about their belief, its none of your business, its between them and their God but you have to ask them whether or not they need something or they have a problem to be solved." Ottoman Sultan, Mehmed The Conqueror

"We are not intended to conquer someone's lands but we want to conquer hearts." Ottoman Sultan, Mehmed The Conqueror

Posted
1 minute ago, Altai said:


"Protest" means to express your disagreement with someones while burning flags is simulation and a small practice of destroying/killing something which calls people to act violent under the conscious.

"Kill"?   How do you kill an inanimate object?  That's just dumb.

Protest can mean burning things.....  yelling....  waving signs....  drawing Muhammad....   All those are non violent and perfectly acceptable to reasonable people.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

Proper disposal of a U.S. flag is by burning.   Much ado about nothing.  

Yes, in fact the Legion has flag burning ceremonies on flag day (June 14). I think the point is people are burning the flag as a protest, usually against the government, and not just to retire an unserviceable flag. While I don't think flag burning is the best form of protest, it is free expression and allowed. Too many people associate protests against the government as protests against America, and nothing could be further from the truth. 

An unserviceable flag is not one that has touched the ground as many people seem to believe. If it gets dirty, then it should be cleaned and reused. If it is worn out (faded, frayed by the wind, or otherwise beyond repair) then it should be destroyed, and that is why it is burned. One thing I do admire about Americans as generally they do take care of their flag, and make sure to fly one that is in decent condition. The number of faded, and wind worn flags flying around in Canada is a disgrace. It is not just the Canadian flag, in Quebec where there are a lot of fleurdelisé flying you see many of them in sad shape.

Edited by ?Impact
Posted
1 hour ago, -1=e^ipi said:

Well that's a nice bait and switch tactic.

 

I was responding to the claim that Canada does have an equivalent to the first amendment, we do not. I never claimed that flag burning was illegal. Flag burning is fine, just don't disagree with feminists on twitter or depict the prophet mohammed.

I have done/seen both on twitter with no incident so you're full of it. 

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Posted
2 hours ago, Altai said:

Such behaviors like as burning flags or burning someone's posters or insulting people is an outburst of violence impulses within someone and give us signals that these persons are prone to commit crimes if they would have a chance. It should not be allowed. 

Maybe in protest of your authoritarianism, I'll burn the Turkish flag.

 

2 hours ago, msj said:

I have done/seen both on twitter with no incident so you're full of it. 

See gregory allen eliot trial. Also see some of the resent comments by the Trudeau government regarding that trial.

Posted
1 hour ago, -1=e^ipi said:

Maybe in protest of your authoritarianism, I'll burn the Turkish flag.

 

See gregory allen eliot trial. Also see some of the resent comments by the Trudeau government regarding that trial.


If you do that in my country, you will be sentenced. If you try to climp a flagpole to down a Turkish flag, you will be shot in the head.
 


 

"You cant ask people about their belief, its none of your business, its between them and their God but you have to ask them whether or not they need something or they have a problem to be solved." Ottoman Sultan, Mehmed The Conqueror

"We are not intended to conquer someone's lands but we want to conquer hearts." Ottoman Sultan, Mehmed The Conqueror

Posted

Well I'm very greatful for not living in your fascist country. Now if only Canada could leave nato or kick Turkey out of NATO so we don't have treaty obligations to protect ISIS supporting Turkey from Russia when Turkey shoots down Russian airplanes in retaliation for Russia fighting ISIS and destroying oil tankers headed from ISIS to Turkey.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...