Charles Anthony Posted May 19, 2016 Report Posted May 19, 2016 Topaz,I have no idea what you are asking! Please clarify by answering the following question: "After posting whatever you want, if a certain member ignores/refuses to participate in your thread, will you get what you want?" I wonder if one can have a debate on a certain member to get other opinions on what this certain member has said in the past or present and to have that certain member explain why they have the response or thoughts they have. Would this be allowed or would one get a warning and a vacation? Everybody but Topaz,If Topaz does not respond to this thread, can any of you guess what she is requesting?? We do not have time for a meeting of the flat earth society. << Où sont mes amis ? Ils sont ici, ils sont ici... >>
Boges Posted May 19, 2016 Report Posted May 19, 2016 Probably bitching about BC2004. But that's just a guess.
waldo Posted May 19, 2016 Report Posted May 19, 2016 probably wanting to extol the positive virtues of MLW member Boges. But that's just a guess.
BC_chick Posted May 19, 2016 Report Posted May 19, 2016 She's asking if it's acceptable to start a thread about a member or if that would be against the rules ending with suspension. It's kind of the worst thing that any humans could be doing at this time in human history. Other than that, it's fine." Bill Nye on Alberta Oil Sands
Topaz Posted May 19, 2016 Report Posted May 19, 2016 BINGO! It is about BC and the replies she can make about Canadians or the government with no really truth, just another off the cuff remarks and yet when I did the same but with backup and truth to my statements, I get a "quit whining" from the moderator! I'm trying to ignore her but the statement she makes, I know others don't like either and IF I say anything to her, the moderator is on my ***!
GostHacked Posted May 19, 2016 Report Posted May 19, 2016 She's asking if it's acceptable to start a thread about a member or if that would be against the rules ending with suspension. IF you can't say anything nice ..
overthere Posted May 19, 2016 Report Posted May 19, 2016 I am very uncomfortable when people start talking about their member. Science too hard for you? Try religion!
Boges Posted May 19, 2016 Report Posted May 19, 2016 (edited) What do I win? Oh different BC. Edited May 19, 2016 by Boges
scribblet Posted May 19, 2016 Report Posted May 19, 2016 Starting a thread to specifically denigrate a member in good standing is definitely not a good idea. Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province
waldo Posted May 19, 2016 Report Posted May 19, 2016 Starting a thread to specifically denigrate a member in good standing is definitely not a good idea. interesting take! Others, certainly not the waldo, might infer otherwise... might relish discussion on perceived differences in how MLW moderation chooses to interpret the posts of varying members, with the stated pointed emphasis questioning posts/statements associated with/to Canada/Canadians. Again, emphasis on the prior use of 'might' and 'perceived'. .
Guest Posted May 19, 2016 Report Posted May 19, 2016 I am very uncomfortable when people start talking about their member. Only if it's their Member for Papineau. Boom Boom!
Topaz Posted May 20, 2016 Report Posted May 20, 2016 Guys, if this is going to cause too many problems lets just forget it and I'll try to ignore her when she slams the country or anything else that Canadian and see how long she can get way with it before she takes a vacation. I just wanted to know why she appears to hate or dislike Canada/Canadians so much.
Guest Posted May 20, 2016 Report Posted May 20, 2016 You have to take other posters' opinions with a grain of salt. If you let them get to you it stops being fun.
Recommended Posts