Jump to content

Bill C-51: Federal Anti-Terror Legislation polling results


Recommended Posts

God Bless you PM Harper. Its about time we had a leader who was strong enough to make the hard choices as a leader. We need him to continue to make the choices that will enable us to be free.

Just makes you want to bust out singing "God bless Americanada" eh?

Freedom is for wussies!!

We'll take surveillance and guns and guards and sniffer dogs 24/7 because ... well ... just in case.

Moose ... to be free of the moose.

They are waaaaay more dangerous than terrorists.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What freedoms have we lost. I cant wait until the election and we get another majority ,so we don't have to listen to the BS from the left. You had your chance with chretien to run good government, but failed miserly. And you are upset because harper is running the cleanest government in a long time. Everything said about evil harper never came true. And that just stings the left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I don't get, is how do you draw the line if it isn't incitement, counseling an offense, hate speech, criminal harassment or criminal libel? Wouldn't this already be in the criminal code?

If it wasn't criminal before, why can the government limit the conscience, thought belief provisions of the charter? It seems unconstitutional and actually in itself criminal harassment, fraud, and probably a few other crimes.

Edited by nerve
Link to comment
Share on other sites

. I thought the Constitution, the Charter and the SCC will protect us. Or is PM Harper planning in doing away with those as well?

I have confidence the SC using the constitution and charter, will protect us. It just seems we seem to be having to go that route way too often these days. Just an expensive waste of time. You would think Harper could better use tax dollars getting legal advice before he tries to ram through yet another poorly written bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have confidence the SC using the constitution and charter, will protect us. It just seems we seem to be having to go that route way too often these days. Just an expensive waste of time. You would think Harper could better use tax dollars getting legal advice before he tries to ram through yet another poorly written bill.

we elect mps to pass laws. That's what they're doing. If the courts want to make the laws then we should dissolve Parliament and just have the courts run our country instead.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

we elect mps to pass laws. That's what they're doing. If the courts want to make the laws then we should dissolve Parliament and just have the courts run our country instead.

We elect mps to propose legislation that conforms to our constitution. We have the SC as an unbiased umpire to protect us from policy fluctuations between one party and the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We elect mps to propose legislation that conforms to our constitution. We have the SC as an unbiased umpire to protect us from policy fluctuations between one party and the other.

This new law doesn't breach our rights at all. Its going to hold up in court. If the SC strikes it down then they've just handed Pm Harper another majority. This law and the niqab ban are very popular with Canadians. The left on this board who oppose these measures are a small minority in Canada.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This new law doesn't breach our rights at all. Its going to hold up in court. If the SC strikes it down then they've just handed Pm Harper another majority. This law and the niqab ban are very popular with Canadians. The left on this board who oppose these measures are a small minority in Canada.

It very well could breach a number of our rights. The language is too vague. You could in fact ed up with a judge issuing a warrant that would allow CSIS to act outside the Charter. Im sure you have been able to some sort of poll which supports your claim. One of the more reputable one that the right ofte quote shows support for the bill, but they fail to mention the follow up question that asks have you read the bill, which shows the support comes from those who are actually ignorant of what the bill actually says. People are now changing to say they may support it with more stringent oversight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oversight is included in the bill already.

A major part of the bill is sharing of information which is very important. That information that us crucial to safeguarding Canada can be freely shared. Right now they cannot be freely shared.

If the police have pc that a terrorist attack may occur the police can detain.

If an unlawful protest is taking place it can be shit down.

No big deal. No ones rights violated. Very simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oversight is included in the bill already.

A major part of the bill is sharing of information which is very important. That information that us crucial to safeguarding Canada can be freely shared. Right now they cannot be freely shared.

If the police have pc that a terrorist attack may occur the police can detain.

If an unlawful protest is taking place it can be shit down.

No big deal. No ones rights violated. Very simple.

No oversight is definitely included. Also SIRC has been gutted while CSIS powers have been greatly increased. An unlawful protest could now be you walking down the sidewalk with a sign. You go ahead ad drink up the kool aid if you like it. A lot of brae people got us the rights we now enjoy. It would be a shame to let some dufus in a sweater vest take them away so he can suck up a few votes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No oversight is definitely included. Also SIRC has been gutted while CSIS powers have been greatly increased. An unlawful protest could now be you walking down the sidewalk with a sign. You go ahead ad drink up the kool aid if you like it. A lot of brae people got us the rights we now enjoy. It would be a shame to let some dufus in a sweater vest take them away so he can suck up a few votes.

. It will be the violent groups who hate our freedom that will take our rights away. Muslim groups like ISIS, that's who wants to take our freedom away. Just ask France. Islamic groups killed people just for drawing cartoons in an effort to shut them up. Looks like its the Muslim groups who want to take away rights.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

. It will be the violent groups who hate our freedom that will take our rights away. Muslim groups like ISIS, that's who wants to take our freedom away. Just ask France. Islamic groups killed people just for drawing cartoons in an effort to shut them up. Looks like its the Muslim groups who want to take away rights.

Only the state has the power to actually do so. If the de minimis threat of terror prompts the government to take action to erode our personal freedoms, then the government is simply caving to the terrorists.

Edited by Black Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of brae people got us the rights we now enjoy. It would be a shame to let some dufus in a sweater vest take them away so he can suck up a few votes.

You honestly believe that this is part of Harper's plan, that he believes a sound election strategy for securing the votes includes removing rights from Canadians?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

. It will be the violent groups who hate our freedom that will take our rights away. Muslim groups like ISIS, that's who wants to take our freedom away. Just ask France. Islamic groups killed people just for drawing cartoons in an effort to shut them up. Looks like its the Muslim groups who want to take away rights.

Sounds like a talking point right out of Harpers book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,751
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Jack4Shiva
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...