Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

You know the Prime Minister is not our Head of State, right?

Your point?

Do you believe David Johnston more powerful/important than Harper? How many ppl can even identify Johnston as GG.. It's very quaint that he holds parties and entertains Canada's guests. I guess for some that is where the real power lies.

My point, is that if you should not have dual citizenship as a senator in Canada, then why should you be allowed as Prime Minister, the head of government in Canada. Whether this happened in 1763, 1867, 2012, or today is irrelevant to me. And please, I know we weren't a country during the Proclamation of 1763..we are just paying for it as if we were.

Thank you for your interest in my Canadian knowledge.

As usual, Guyser has not added one iota of intelligent contribution to anything. If you find this debate shallow and stupid it is well above your level of comprehension and intelligence level.

Edited by drummindiver
  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Right, wrong or indifferent, I think it's an impediment for anyone seeking to be a country's leader. You need every vote you can get and there a bound to be some who would be confused, if not put off by someone having duel citizenship......as can clearly be seen in this thread.

I agree but Squid is right about an EU passport being very valuable in many occupations. I qualify for a British passport through my mother and often thought about getting one but now I am retired, it doesn't seem important any more and I will always be a Canadian anyway. My sister got one, I think just to feel closer to her mother, who ironically had carried only a Canadian passport for more than the last 60 years of her life.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted (edited)

No, it gives me several advantages, like travelling and working in EU countries. What are you so afraid of? Spies?

You need to work in several EU countries as PM?

You need this to travel in EU countries as PM?

Really?

I didn't realize that the PM would want to work in EU countries as a PM.

I also didn't realize how difficult it would be for him to travel there.

I'm glad some of you have dual citizenship. If you become PM of Canada, that is when it would be of concern to me, regardless of how "stupid and shallow" some of you may find my concern.

Edited by drummindiver
Posted

... Turner was born in the UK to a Canadian mother so he didn't have any choice as to whether he had dual citizenship. He certainly didn't actively seek it.

I don't know that this would have been true... He became a Canadian citizen at some point... probably as a child, I would think. Generally, you have to apply to have dual citizenship; it isn't simply automatic.

You need to work in several EU countries as PM?

You need this to travel in EU countries as PM?

Really?

I didn't realize that the PM would want to work in EU countries as a PM.

I also didn't realize how difficult it would be for him to travel there.

I'm glad some of you have dual citizenship. If you become PM of Canada, that is when it would be of concern to me, regardless of how "stupid and shallow" some of you may find my concern.

PIK didn't mention the PM nor did I in my reply.

However, it makes no difference whether the PM is a dual citizen or not... there is nothing that prevents it. And I don't get all worked up about someone's citizenship, PM or not. It says nothing about their loyalty or ability to perform their duties.

Are you afraid the PM being a spy???

Posted (edited)

My point, is that if you should not have dual citizenship as a senator in Canada,

Your point is incorrect. Sorry 'bout that chief.

As usual, Guyser has not added one iota of intelligent contribution to anything. If you find this debate shallow and stupid it is well above your level of comprehension and intelligence level.

Except I tried to tell you the correct thing , but stubbornly refused to go off and learn.

And look above, still wrong.

If 'not added one iota of intelligent contribution ' equals being right while you are still SOS......well, what can I say.

Im guessing this isnt going the way you wanted. Next time learn the constitution you are quoting instead of embarassing yourself.

You're welcome.

Edited by Guyser2
Posted

I don't know that this would have been true... He became a Canadian citizen at some point... probably as a child, I would think. Generally, you have to apply to have dual citizenship; it isn't simply automatic.

PIK didn't mention the PM nor did I in my reply.

However, it makes no difference whether the PM is a dual citizen or not... there is nothing that prevents it. And I don't get all worked up about someone's citizenship, PM or not. It says nothing about their loyalty or ability to perform their duties.

Are you afraid the PM being a spy???

lol.

Are you Guyser in disguise, because this is beyond ludicrous.

It directly says something about their loyalty.

Didn't mention the PM? Who/what are we talking about, because you've absolutely lost me if we aren't.

Posted

Your point is incorrect. Sorry 'bout that chief.

Except I tried to tell you the correct thing , but stubbornly refused to go off and learn.

And look above, still wrong.

If 'not added one iota of intelligent contribution ' equals being right while you are still SOS......well, what can I say.

Im guessing this isnt going the way you wanted. Next time learn the constitution you are quoting instead of embarassing yourself.

You're welcome.

Yes, I've directly quoted the Constitution. Sorry, you must be right because you said you are with no supporting evidence except your say so. Which is of course all you need, Oh Omnipotent One.

Posted (edited)

Yes, I've directly quoted the Constitution. Sorry, you must be right because you said you are with no supporting evidence except your say so. Which is of course all you need, Oh Omnipotent One.

LOL...come on, are you writing comedy or what?

Post 14 answered the question.

And yes, thanks for quoting the Constitution, didja happen to read it, becuase it refutes what you are trying to say.

Aww...since following along is hard, it states a Senator (<----that means one who ALREADY is one) cannot swear another countries allegiance. But if they already have it...so be it.

D'oh !

Edited by Guyser2
Posted

lol.

Are you Guyser in disguise, because this is beyond ludicrous.

It directly says something about their loyalty.

Didn't mention the PM? Who/what are we talking about, because you've absolutely lost me if we aren't.

I won't bother holding your hand and linking the post that I responded to, but you should go back and read it. The post I was responding to was about dual citizenship for any Canadian. Hence my reply didn't include anything about the PM...

Posted

... probably as a child, I would think. Generally, you have to apply to have dual citizenship; it isn't simply automatic.

If mom was CDN then it is automatic (or dad) for the child to become CDN, no matter where born
Posted

If mom was CDN then it is automatic (or dad) for the child to become CDN, no matter where born

No, it is not automatic.

An appliciation is required and you must prove parental citizenship.

Science too hard for you? Try religion!

Posted (edited)

No, it is not automatic.

An appliciation is required and you must prove parental citizenship.

Oh ok thanks

Would you mind calling Immigration and Citizenship in Ottawa and tell them? They are handing out the wrong information.

If a child is born outside Canada to a parent that is a CDN citizen (pre '09) then you automatically are a CDN citizen.

Edited by Guyser2
Posted

My niece: born in Canada, resident elsewhere- just did it for both her children, born outside Canada. It was a slow process and also quite expensive. Both her children were born before 2009.

She could not get CDN passports for either child until they were determined to be citizens and given documentation to that effect.

So, no, it is not automatic.

Science too hard for you? Try religion!

Posted

I do not want a leader that has given allegiance to another country. It is very simple. You are canadian or not, or go to france and run their.

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted

Well, lets see...should Harper still be the PM for his party trying to bribe a vote, being held in contempt of Parliament, all the scams, schemes, charges from Election Canada for robo calls, overspending during a election..... this party and PM doesn't know the meaning of the words trust worthy, respectability or accountable.

Posted

Maybe we should focus less on the relative risk of allowing certain people to become Prime Minister and instead focusing on effective methods for holding them to account for when they fall off the wagon. Because, you know, judging from the out and out theft of tax dollars for partisan purposes by the CPC Government, there seems to be jack all in the way of rules preventing or punishing what they are doing. One way you know somebody is above the law is that there is literally no law to address their wrongdoings.

Posted

My niece: born in Canada, resident elsewhere- just did it for both her children, born outside Canada. It was a slow process and also quite expensive. Both her children were born before 2009.

She could not get CDN passports for either child until they were determined to be citizens and given documentation to that effect.

So, no, it is not automatic.

Oh i see.

Yea, it is automatic.

Those kids were automatically CDN's citizens since they were born outside Canada to a Cdn citizen.

Your niece had to get Proof of Citizenship (yours and mine are Prov Birth Certs) in order to get passports. But they were CDN citizens.

You are forgiven for not understanding the rules. Please cancel the call to Immigration then.

Posted

“Am I Canadian?” See if you are already a citizen
You are probably a Canadian citizen if…
•you were born in Canada,
•you applied for and received your Canadian citizenship (this is called becoming a naturalized citizen),
•you received Canadian citizenship as a minor when a parent or legal guardian naturalized you by applying for your citizenship,
you were born outside Canada after April 17, 2009, and at least one of your parents was born in Canada,

We can call person A Sarah....

Sarah was born in Canada.

While living outside Canada, Sarah gives birth to Jessica. Jessica’s father is also a Canadian citizen. Jessica is a Canadian citizen at birth and is born in the first generation outside Canada. Sarah and Jessica continue to live outside Canada.

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/citizenship/rules_2009.asp

Posted

Do you believe David Johnston more powerful/important than Harper?

Seeing as the Prime Minister only sits as long as he has the confidence of the House, yeah. I think the monarch is more powerful and important than Harper.
Posted (edited)

Right, wrong or indifferent, I think it's an impediment for anyone seeking to be a country's leader. You need every vote you can get and there a bound to be some who would be confused, if not put off by someone having duel citizenship......as can clearly be seen in this thread.

Sure but lets face it... The hacks whining about it in this thread would not vote for Mulcair even if he was the most "Canadian" person in history of the universe. I wonder when they are going to demand to see the "long form" version of his birth certificate?

What does Donald Trump have to say about this!!!

Edited by dre

I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger

Posted (edited)

Right, wrong or indifferent, I think it's an impediment for anyone I seeking to be a country's leader. You need every vote you can get and there a bound to be some who would be confused, if not put off by someone having duel citizenship......as can clearly be seen in this thread.

Dumb democracy down for the base...doesn't get much baser than that.

Edited by eyeball

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted (edited)

LOL...come on, are you writing comedy or what?

Post 14 answered the question.

And yes, thanks for quoting the Constitution, didja happen to read it, becuase it refutes what you are trying to say.

Aww...since following along is hard, it states a Senator (<----that means one who ALREADY is one) cannot swear another countries allegiance. But if they already have it...so be it.

D'oh !

"Aww...since following along is hard, it states a Senator (<----that means one who ALREADY is one) cannot swear another countries allegiance. But if they already have it...so be it."

And this advances your argument how? If anything, it substantiates mine. As you say, if they already have it, so be it. But, if you are going to serve, you'd better serve the ppl paying your way ie Canadians.

If having dual (duel, as some of you learned ppl are wont to say) is as acceptable as you claim, why then is it forbidden? That doesn't seem right, does it?

Edited by drummindiver
Posted

Seeing as the Prime Minister only sits as long as he has the confidence of the House, yeah. I think the monarch is more powerful and important than Harper.

You are being purposely disingenuous. The Prime Minister, as being first among equals, is elected to govern. The GG is appointed for five years in a ceremonial role. They do have prerogative powers, but only used during extreme trials and tribulations.

If your position is that the GG is more powerful than the PM, I see your face palm and up you a nuclear face palm.

Posted (edited)

And this advances your argument how? If anything, it substantiates mine.

Substantiate what ?

Well I tried to go back and re-visit your intitial post, but lo and behold it is gone.

I wonder why? Get rid of evidence proving you didnt know what you were talking about?

I guess so. if not, please enlighten us.

Thats the very first time I have ever seen that done by anyone here.

ANyhow, to recap, it is NOT against the Constitution for a MP to have dual citizenship, nor a Senator since it is grandfathered.

But once a Senator, one cannot then get it.

Edited by Guyser2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,909
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    miawilliams3232
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • derek848 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Barquentine earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...