WestCoastRunner Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 Not good enough for the mob (here) so quick to indict Wilson for murder...they believe that petty criminals and thugs are still citizens with the right to assault police without fear of lethal force...just maybe some net guns, pepper spray, or sticky foam. [/sarcasm] why do posters need to include a 'sarcasm' note to their post? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 Shady, this isn't a chess game. And you still believe bs in the media. Who are you to say that it's bs? Are your sources better than the Washington Post's? If so, let's hear them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 Not good enough for the mob (here) so quick to indict Wilson for murder Yep. Guilty until proven innocent for the officer. Innocent until proven guilty for Mr. Brown. That's their idea of "justice." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoastRunner Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 Shady, this isn't a chess game. And you still believe bs in the media. Ed Magee, a spokesman for St. Louis County Prosecutor Robert McCulloch, declined to comment on the new reports about Wilson, and said prosecutors have not received any medical records. But he said that because Wilson was taken to the hospital, McCulloch’s office assumes such records exist. Why would they not have received such records by now. And where is Wilson's lawyer? Where are the supporters of Wilson? Why haven't they come out in the media to support him? That is a common tactical legal maneuver to bring out his supporters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallc Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 The majority of paranoid schizophrenics are not violent. Actually, you'll see I didn't bring up mental illness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoastRunner Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 Actually, you'll see I didn't bring up mental illness. You most certainly did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
On Guard for Thee Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 Well, well, well... The signs of easing tensions came as a family friend of the officer who fatally shot Brown came forward to offer a version of the incident with new details, saying that the officer suffered a fracture to his eye socket in a scuffle with the unarmed teenager before opening fire. Hospital X-rays of the injury have been taken and will be shared with a grand jury that is weighing evidence to determine whether Officer Darren Wilson should be charged in the shooting, said the friend http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/police-officer-who-shot-michael-brown-suffered-fractured-eye-socket-friend-says/2014/08/21/177524ea-293c-11e4-958c-268a320a60ce_story.html?hpid=z1 X-rays of the fracture will be shared with the grand jury. Checkmate. The article is full of assumptions. Noone has rec'd any medical records and statements like "a friend said" etc. "McCulloch's office assumes such records exist" are aLONG way from anything near "checkmate". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 Checkmate.You do realize that even if it turns out that the officer was fully justified in shooting Brown, it would still be pathetic that you regurgitated unfounded accusations against Brown without sourcing your information. Checkmate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
On Guard for Thee Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 why do posters need to include a 'sarcasm' note to their post? It's certainly not that we need any help identifying same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 Ed Magee, a spokesman for St. Louis County Prosecutor Robert McCulloch, declined to comment on the new reports about Wilson, and said prosecutors have not received any medical records. But he said that because Wilson was taken to the hospital, McCulloch’s office assumes such records exist. Why would they not have received such records by now. And where is Wilson's lawyer? Where are the supporters of Wilson? Why haven't they come out in the media to support him? That is a common tactical legal maneuver to bring out his supporters. Supporters of Wilson can't go out in public, because they fear for their lives. But some have spoken to the media. Are you disputing that the grand jury will recieve said x-rays? On what basis? Because you personally don't know if they've recieved them as of today? What's your link to the quote you posted? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoastRunner Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 It's certainly not that we need any help identifying same. Yea, I don't get it. If they are that brilliant in their posts, do they need to identify it as sarcasm? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 You do realize that even if it turns out that the officer was fully justified in shooting Brown, it would still be pathetic that you regurgitated unfounded accusations against Brown without sourcing your information. Checkmate. Nope, I sourced my information. But what's really pathetic is finding one person guilty until proven innocent, while finding another person innocent until proven guilty. It's pathetic and unjust. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoastRunner Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 Supporters of Wilson can't go out in public, because they fear for their lives. But some have spoken to the media. Are you disputing that the grand jury will recieve said x-rays? On what basis? Because you personally don't know if they've recieved them as of today? What's your link to the quote you posted? LOL, the quote I posted was from your link!! good grief! They fear for their lives?? I haven't seen any supporters speak to the media. Do you have links? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 The article is full of assumptions. Noone has rec'd any medical records and statements like "a friend said" etc. "McCulloch's office assumes such records exist" are aLONG way from anything near "checkmate". At least people like you might be a little less eager to jump on someone's guilt without knowing all of the facts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbg Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 why do posters need to include a 'sarcasm' note to their post?It's certainly not that we need any help identifying same.I think one of my suspensions may have been from not flagging a post as sarcastic or satirical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoastRunner Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 I think one of my suspensions may have been from not flagging a post as sarcastic or satirical. What a stupid rule! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
On Guard for Thee Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 LOL, the quote I posted was from your link!! good grief! They fear for their lives?? I haven't seen any supporters speak to the media. Do you have links? It certainly wasn't overly hard to pick out the flimsyness in that link. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbg Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 What a stupid rule!It isn't a rule. I started a thread when Hugo Chavez died about the effect of his death on Canada and his solid values. Some people didn't think it was funny, and reported it. The reports earned me a 30 day suspension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoastRunner Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 It certainly wasn't overly hard to pick out the flimsyness in that link. If they want to be taken seriously, they need to post serious content. It's a pretty simple rule to follow. I consider myself to have an open mind and if sources are credible, I will listen and take a second look. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoastRunner Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 It isn't a rule. I started a thread when Hugo Chavez died about the effect of his death on Canada and his solid values. Some people didn't think it was funny, and reported it. The reports earned me a 30 day suspension. That was a stupid suspension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 If they want to be taken seriously, they need to post serious content. It's a pretty simple rule to follow. I consider myself to have an open mind and if sources are credible, I will listen and take a second look. The Washington Post isn't serious content? How so? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
On Guard for Thee Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 At least people like you might be a little less eager to jump on someone's guilt without knowing all of the facts. It was you who used the word "checkmate" as though this article contained any facts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoastRunner Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 The Washington Post isn't serious content? How so? You took everything at face value. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 You took everything at face value. Kinda like you judging the officer to be guilty before knowing all of the facts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbg Posted August 23, 2014 Report Share Posted August 23, 2014 (edited) That was a stupid suspension.I thought so but the reporting posters didn't agree. It's no secret that me and BC-2004 are in a close race for most despised posters here that aren't banned outright. Edited August 23, 2014 by jbg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.