cybercoma Posted September 12, 2013 Report Share Posted September 12, 2013 Lol @ Mother Jones! What's next, the Daily Worket?!! Lol!You know Mother Jones didn't write the report right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybercoma Posted September 12, 2013 Report Share Posted September 12, 2013 So I take it Elizabeth Warren isn't in the running? haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted September 12, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 12, 2013 Shady, you're wasting your time with anyone who believes the spin from the left that the IRS did absolutely nothing out of the ordinary. Obama or any government agency under his administration could ever be responsible for anything like this in the eyes of those that adore him and his sideshow of an administration. So no matter how much evidence there is that there was IRS targeting, there's no convincing them that there was any wrong doing hence making your efforts very futile. First of all, I've made it pretty clear I have precisely NO admiration for Obama. Second of all, that 'no matter how much evidence' part had me laughing since there's damned near NO evidence of conscious wrongdoing on the part of the IRS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted September 14, 2013 Report Share Posted September 14, 2013 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/14/feds-looking-into-clinton-2008-campaign-for-links-to-dc-corruption-case/ WASHINGTON – Federal investigators reportedly are looking into Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign and its ties to a corruption case against a D.C. businessman sources say bankrolled questionable political operations. Investigators have been looking into claims that Jeffrey Thompson allegedly shelled out more than a half million dollars to fund secret “street teams” operating in Texas, North Carolina, Indiana and Pennsylvania for Clinton’s 2008 campaign. Not the first time she has been involved in shady campaigns and corruption. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybercoma Posted September 16, 2013 Report Share Posted September 16, 2013 (edited) I don't now why anyone would trust the Clintons after what they've done in the past. Edited September 16, 2013 by cybercoma Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dre Posted September 16, 2013 Report Share Posted September 16, 2013 (edited) I don't now why anyone would trust the Clintons after what they've done in the past. Because at the end of the day all have to choose a party full of opportunistic, corrupt liars, and a party of stupid and crazy opportunistic ,corrupt liars. Edited September 16, 2013 by dre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharkman Posted September 16, 2013 Report Share Posted September 16, 2013 I don't now why anyone would trust the Clintons after what they've done in the past. Funny thing about that. While Clinton was in office, nobody cared about the Whitewater scandal, or any of the other issues that came out. Had Bush Jr had sex with a young intern less than half his age while at work, his administration would have come to an end, but with Clinton, it became a privacy issue. Anyway, if it didn't matter then, it won't matter in 2016. The press will probably suggest these scandals add to her resume and make her that much better than Christie. Most of the voting public doesn't see their party as a bunch of dishonest power hungry idealogues, only the other party is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybercoma Posted September 17, 2013 Report Share Posted September 17, 2013 Nobody cared? He was impeached by the House, remember? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted September 17, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2013 Because at the end of the day all have to choose a party full of opportunistic, corrupt liars, and a party of stupid and crazy opportunistic ,corrupt liars. Sadly true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharkman Posted September 17, 2013 Report Share Posted September 17, 2013 (edited) Nobody cared? He was impeached by the House, remember? Wasn't that for lying? Although plenty of conservatives did care I suppose. Edited September 17, 2013 by sharkman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest American Woman Posted September 17, 2013 Report Share Posted September 17, 2013 Wasn't that for lying? Although plenty of conservatives did care I suppose.Sure they cared. And if it weren't for their caring about Clinton's consensual relationship with an intern, he would have never lied about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Squid Posted September 18, 2013 Report Share Posted September 18, 2013 Sure they cared. And if it weren't for their caring about Clinton's consensual relationship with an intern, he would have never lied about it. It should be a concern... A president should have a bit more control over themselves and avoid banging interns... What if this intern had nefarious motives? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted September 18, 2013 Report Share Posted September 18, 2013 Maybe there'll be another Bush vs Clinton, Jeb vs Hillary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest American Woman Posted September 18, 2013 Report Share Posted September 18, 2013 Maybe there'll be another Bush vs Clinton, Jeb vs Hillary.Now that would be interesting....and I wouldn't have even one doubt as to who to vote for! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted September 18, 2013 Report Share Posted September 18, 2013 Wow, who to vote for ... Jeb or Hillary ... how much more can you scrape off the bottom of that barrel? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharkman Posted September 18, 2013 Report Share Posted September 18, 2013 You know what? I could live with either of those. But I'd rather live with Christie. And I'm secure enough in my manhood to say that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bleeding heart Posted September 19, 2013 Report Share Posted September 19, 2013 I missed the part where you explain how anybody's "right to vote" was interfered with. I mean, you Elephant Team guys who insist that voter roll purges and voter ID laws and 6 hour lineups aren't impeding peoples' right to vote had better be prepared to come up with a hell of a good argument if you're going to claim that peoples' right to vote was impeded because the Tallahassee TeaTards weren't given a tax exemption. You're a long way from meeting the standard, sharkman. And, like I said earlier, Republican-supporting groups spent hundreds of millions of dollars to "get out the vote". How much more money do you think they needed? -k A double--maybe triple!--zing! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yaniya Posted September 25, 2013 Report Share Posted September 25, 2013 I really like your way of expressing the opinion and sharing the information. I really like your way of expressing the opinion and sharing the information. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybercoma Posted October 7, 2013 Report Share Posted October 7, 2013 Did I mention Elizabeth Warren yet in this thread? haha http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/us_politics/2013/10/elizabeth_warren_surges_in_new_prez_poll Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted October 7, 2013 Report Share Posted October 7, 2013 Did I mention Elizabeth Warren yet in this thread? hahahttp://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/us_politics/2013/10/elizabeth_warren_surges_in_new_prez_poll Warren is a far leftwing loon that will never be elected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybercoma Posted October 7, 2013 Report Share Posted October 7, 2013 She provides at least partial balance to the gaggle of far Right Wing loons in American politics. There is absolutely no Left Wing equivalent to the band of idiots that have taken the GOP hostage though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roy baty Posted October 7, 2013 Report Share Posted October 7, 2013 She provides at least partial balance to the gaggle of far Right Wing loons in American politics. There is absolutely no Left Wing equivalent to the band of idiots that have taken the GOP hostage though. Nonsense and clearly biased statement...Reid, Pelosi, Barney Frank are just a few equivalent over on the Dem's side. If you don't thinks there's loons on both sides responsible for the complete division down there, you're dreaming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest American Woman Posted October 7, 2013 Report Share Posted October 7, 2013 (edited) If you don't thinks there's loons on both sides responsible for the complete division down there, you're dreaming. Agreed. There are loons of every political stripe in every country. Edited October 7, 2013 by American Woman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topaz Posted October 15, 2013 Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 Mike Savage, a radio host, said, he's heard a new party is going to appear from the Eastern part of the US soon. I think Americans need more choice than just the two partiesd, that have created the 16-17 trillion debt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted October 15, 2013 Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 The U.S. already has many political parties.....more than in Canada. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.