Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Shady, you're wasting your time with anyone who believes the spin from the left that the IRS did absolutely nothing out of the ordinary. Obama or any government agency under his administration could ever be responsible for anything like this in the eyes of those that adore him and his sideshow of an administration. So no matter how much evidence there is that there was IRS targeting, there's no convincing them that there was any wrong doing hence making your efforts very futile.

First of all, I've made it pretty clear I have precisely NO admiration for Obama.

Second of all, that 'no matter how much evidence' part had me laughing since there's damned near NO evidence of conscious wrongdoing on the part of the IRS.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/14/feds-looking-into-clinton-2008-campaign-for-links-to-dc-corruption-case/

WASHINGTON – Federal investigators reportedly are looking into Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign and its ties to a corruption case against a D.C. businessman sources say bankrolled questionable political operations.

Investigators have been looking into claims that Jeffrey Thompson allegedly shelled out more than a half million dollars to fund secret “street teams” operating in Texas, North Carolina, Indiana and Pennsylvania for Clinton’s 2008 campaign.

Not the first time she has been involved in shady campaigns and corruption.

Posted (edited)

I don't now why anyone would trust the Clintons after what they've done in the past.

Because at the end of the day all have to choose a party full of opportunistic, corrupt liars, and a party of stupid and crazy opportunistic ,corrupt liars.

Edited by dre

I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger

Posted

I don't now why anyone would trust the Clintons after what they've done in the past.

Funny thing about that. While Clinton was in office, nobody cared about the Whitewater scandal, or any of the other issues that came out. Had Bush Jr had sex with a young intern less than half his age while at work, his administration would have come to an end, but with Clinton, it became a privacy issue.

Anyway, if it didn't matter then, it won't matter in 2016. The press will probably suggest these scandals add to her resume and make her that much better than Christie. Most of the voting public doesn't see their party as a bunch of dishonest power hungry idealogues, only the other party is.

Posted

Because at the end of the day all have to choose a party full of opportunistic, corrupt liars, and a party of stupid and crazy opportunistic ,corrupt liars.

Sadly true.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted (edited)

Nobody cared? He was impeached by the House, remember?

Wasn't that for lying? Although plenty of conservatives did care I suppose.

Edited by sharkman
Guest American Woman
Posted

Wasn't that for lying? Although plenty of conservatives did care I suppose.

Sure they cared. And if it weren't for their caring about Clinton's consensual relationship with an intern, he would have never lied about it.
Posted

Sure they cared. And if it weren't for their caring about Clinton's consensual relationship with an intern, he would have never lied about it.

It should be a concern...

A president should have a bit more control over themselves and avoid banging interns... What if this intern had nefarious motives?

Guest American Woman
Posted

Maybe there'll be another Bush vs Clinton, Jeb vs Hillary.

Now that would be interesting....and I wouldn't have even one doubt as to who to vote for! :)
Posted

I missed the part where you explain how anybody's "right to vote" was interfered with. I mean, you Elephant Team guys who insist that voter roll purges and voter ID laws and 6 hour lineups aren't impeding peoples' right to vote had better be prepared to come up with a hell of a good argument if you're going to claim that peoples' right to vote was impeded because the Tallahassee TeaTards weren't given a tax exemption. You're a long way from meeting the standard, sharkman.

And, like I said earlier, Republican-supporting groups spent hundreds of millions of dollars to "get out the vote". How much more money do you think they needed?

-k

A double--maybe triple!--zing!

“There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver."

--Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

She provides at least partial balance to the gaggle of far Right Wing loons in American politics. There is absolutely no Left Wing equivalent to the band of idiots that have taken the GOP hostage though.

Posted

She provides at least partial balance to the gaggle of far Right Wing loons in American politics. There is absolutely no Left Wing equivalent to the band of idiots that have taken the GOP hostage though.

Nonsense and clearly biased statement...Reid, Pelosi, Barney Frank are just a few equivalent over on the Dem's side. If you don't thinks there's loons on both sides responsible for the complete division down there, you're dreaming.

Guest American Woman
Posted (edited)

If you don't thinks there's loons on both sides responsible for the complete division down there, you're dreaming.

Agreed. There are loons of every political stripe in every country.

Edited by American Woman
Posted

Mike Savage, a radio host, said, he's heard a new party is going to appear from the Eastern part of the US soon. I think Americans need more choice than just the two partiesd, that have created the 16-17 trillion debt.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,921
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    henryjhon123
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • LinkSoul60 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • LinkSoul60 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • LinkSoul60 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • LinkSoul60 earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • LinkSoul60 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...