Jump to content

New evidence Nixon did indeed sabotage peace talks in 68


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 228
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah...they deserved better...like the helpless kids in Germany and Japan who got incendiaries instead.

Or the millions of SE Asians who were murdered in the peace that followed the war. Sometimes there are reasons to fight. I think most can agree the Viet-Nam War was fought in entirely the wrong way. Napalming friendlies...as mentioned. Free fire zones...etc. A powerful combined arms force should have sliced the trail while another drove north Rommel-style to Hanoi...Red China be damned. But...alas...

Edited by DogOnPorch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A peacemongers reward can be just as bad (and often worse) than war. But then again, these are the same people who want unfettered abortion on demand....go figure !

It was easier to pretend Boat People just got sucked out to sea from the Hong Kong harbour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was easier to pretend Boat People just got sucked out to sea from the Hong Kong harbour.

I met a lot of Boat People back in the 70's....none wanted to go back to Vietnam then. Instead, Vietnam has come back to them.

Little trace remains of any hostility towards America—just one, after

all, of the many countries Vietnam fought during the past century. It

went to war more recently (in 1979) with China, a perennial enemy over

the last millennium, and the authorities still seem more suspicious of

their northern neighbours and fellow communists than of anyone else.

America and Vietnam restored diplomatic ties in 1995, and signed a trade

pact in 2000. America is now Vietnam's largest export market. Disputes

between the two countries hinge more on tariffs and market access than

on war crimes or missing soldiers.

http://www.economist.com/node/3914886

Edited by bush_cheney2004
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I met a lot of Boat People back in the 70's....none wanted to go back to Vietnam then. Instead, Vietnam has come back to them.

Little trace remains of any hostility towards America—just one, after

all, of the many countries Vietnam fought during the past century. It

went to war more recently (in 1979) with China, a perennial enemy over

the last millennium, and the authorities still seem more suspicious of

their northern neighbours and fellow communists than of anyone else.

America and Vietnam restored diplomatic ties in 1995, and signed a trade

pact in 2000. America is now Vietnam's largest export market. Disputes

between the two countries hinge more on tariffs and market access than

on war crimes or missing soldiers.

http://www.economist.com/node/3914886

Yes...but it's flogging Kathie Lee Gifford's fine line of products...etc. Not a South Korea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess you haven't been following the news huh? And still blaming Romney? Yep, whatever happened to that threat anyways?

Obama Says Iran A Year Away From Nuclear Weapon

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/03/14/obama-says-iran-a-year-away-from-nuclear-weapon/

The link you provided proves my point!

Thanks Shady!

WWWTT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No...you need facts....old timers like me actually experienced the time in question. 'We' voted for Nixon, of course.

So you are saying that only I need facts and that everyone else has the facts?Right?

OK,if you say so then???

WWWTT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest American Woman

So you are saying that only I need facts and that everyone else has the facts?Right?

OK,if you say so then???

I think he's saying you need facts because you don't have the knowledge that came with experiencing it. There is something to be said for that if you think about it - we can read the "facts" about WWII, for example, but we didn't experience it, fight in it, live through it, so we don't have the knowledge that those who did experience it have no matter how many random facts we read about it. In other words, hard "facts" are just a part of it, and we are looking at them with 20/20 vision, so we are not looking at them re: choices made at the time through the eyes of those living it at the time. We aren't experiencing what the climate/atmosphere was re: threats, fears, unknowns - and those are a type of fact too, as they are the reality at the time. It's easy to just look at the hard facts in retrospect, in hindsight, and judge - but there's more to the overall picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he's saying you need facts because you don't have the knowledge that came with experiencing it. There is something to be said for that if you think about it - we can read the "facts" about WWII, for example, but we didn't experience it, fight in it, live through it, so we don't have the knowledge that those who did experience it have no matter how many random facts we read about it. In other words, hard "facts" are just a part of it, and we are looking at them with 20/20 vision, so we are not looking at them re: choices made at the time through the eyes of those living it at the time. We aren't experiencing what the climate/atmosphere was re: threats, fears, unknowns - and those are a type of fact too, as they are the reality at the time. It's easy to just look at the hard facts in retrospect, in hindsight, and judge - but there's more to the overall picture.

Barry Goldwater?? Who the heck is that guy? I guess if yer from Arizona or something....

smile.png

barry_button1.gif

Edited by DogOnPorch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he's saying you need facts because you don't have the knowledge that came with experiencing it. There is something to be said for that if you think about it - we can read the "facts" about WWII, for example, but we didn't experience it, fight in it, live through it, so we don't have the knowledge that those who did experience it have no matter how many random facts we read about it. In other words, hard "facts" are just a part of it, and we are looking at them with 20/20 vision, so we are not looking at them re: choices made at the time through the eyes of those living it at the time. We aren't experiencing what the climate/atmosphere was re: threats, fears, unknowns - and those are a type of fact too, as they are the reality at the time. It's easy to just look at the hard facts in retrospect, in hindsight, and judge - but there's more to the overall picture.

Nor was I subject to all the misrepresentations,the lies,the false beliefs,propaganda,brainwashing.

Ya I guess that's a bad thing I can't appreciate.

I do remember watching the news with my family in the early 70's where I saw American troops beating an old Vietnamese man with a sledge hammer as the old man begged for mercy,among many other war crimes the US committed!

WWWTT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,722
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    phoenyx75
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • User went up a rank
      Enthusiast
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...