Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This was 99% a comet that broke up violently in our atmosphere. Lake Cheko is thought to be the sight of the impact of what was left.

Makes more sense, a comet is not as solid as a meteor, so would create a lot of damage without leaving much evidence, or fragments. Also since this stuff is from space, it could be radioactive from it just being in space with all the cosmic rays and such, not sure.

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Makes more sense, a comet is not as solid as a meteor, so would create a lot of damage without leaving much evidence, or fragments. Also since this stuff is from space, it could be radioactive from it just being in space with all the cosmic rays and such, not sure.

If you look-up Lake Cheko on Google Maps, you can see it is a bit of an anomaly. Everything not shielded is subject to cosmic rays in space.

Posted (edited)

Peekskill Meteor:

A 12.4 kg
, classified as an H6
, that fell in Peekskill, New York, on Oct. 9, 1992, penetrating the trunk of a 1980 Chevy Malibu that was sitting in its driveway. The descent of the space rock was witnessed by thousands in the eastern United States as a brilliant
and was caught on at least 14 amateur videotapes.

Edited by bush_cheney2004

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

The evidence points more to a nuclear blast covering a massive 500,000 acres and no impact crater!

The air burst in Russian left no impact crater rolleyes.gif

"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure."

- Mark Twain

Posted

How's that space program coming along you ask? Well, not too good I'd say given how the natural resource window through which our species might shoehorn itself into space was co-opted by the 1% for their own purposes.

I think we probably only get one chance at this shoehorning business. Might as well keep partying like there's no tomorrow I guess.

What are you talking about? We've theoretically had the ability to nuke ourselves to another solar system since the 60s.

"Natural resource window through which our species might shoehorn itself into space was co-opted by the 1% for their own purposes."

Where do you environmentalists come up with this drivel?

Posted

We've theoretically had the ability to nuke ourselves to another solar system since the 60s.

Excuse me but, you said something about drivel?

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
...the NERVA was deemed ready to design into a working vehicle by NASA, creating a small political crisis in Congress because of the danger a Mars exploration program presented to the national budget.

We can't even nuke ourselves to the next planet never mind the next star.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

I don't doubt it's real, but the reason for the general slowdown that's now slowing to a bare crawl is our inability to muster our resources. We're great at concentrating them but to what purpose?

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

Most folks think Galaxy and Solar System mean the same thing.

Really? Hmmm maybe that explains why so many people seem to think the world and it's resources just go on forever and ever.

Fisheries ministers where I live still remark that there's so much fish out in the ocean that guys like Jimmy Parttison can walk on them.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted (edited)

Orion was still on the drawing boards. But had it gone ahead, by now I'm sure we'd be in year X of the Orion probe's transit between our star and perhaps Barnard's star or the Centauri system.

True. That's why I said we've theoretically had the ability to do so. We have the technology. We just are unable to test the nuke propulsion design.

Edited by CPCFTW
Posted (edited)

The latest update on the Russian meteorsays it was actually about 10,000 tons with a diameter of 55 feet. So it was bigger than a house, but current technology coudn't detect it? Does that sound a little strange?

It's not that the technology to detect it doesn't exist; it certainly does. It's that the investment in detecting such objects is not sufficient to guarantee we'll catch all of them in advance. Things like this cost money, and the current mood is to cut any spending that isn't an entitlement/handout/bailout, not fund space programs and telescopes which the ignorant public sees as a fanciful and extravagant waste of money.

Edited by Bonam
Posted

Hey, we're entitled to our billionaires.

I grew up mesmerized by Apollo and 2001 A Space Odyssey and never imagined I wouldn't one day be in space living the dream. Even in the big city I could easily see the rings around Saturn through my telescope. Then I grew up.

Sorry...you were saying something about a waste of money?

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dave L went up a rank
      Contributor
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...