Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The US, at least in part, brought the terror attacks upon themselves.

Much in the same way a doctor brings about terror attacks on themselves by preforming abortions.

  • Replies 219
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest American Woman
Posted

It's called BLOWBACK.

Actions taken by the USA previous to 9/11 in other countries were a factor into the why the attack on the USA happened.

Yes. Al Qaeda was so upset over our past history, being such a humanitarian, charitable organization to Muslims at large, never mind infidels, they engaged in BLOWBACK. They care so much about other countries.

But yes. It was "actions taken by the USA" previous to 9-11 that caused babies to be targeted and killed. I repeat. "The USA." While Canada shined it's well-deserved halo. And if only it weren't for those actions, al Qaeda would have remained the peace loving, charitable, giving organization that it's so well known for. The Devil made them do it.

:rolleyes:

Guest American Woman
Posted

Who gives a crap what that specific dictionary says.

I don't give a crap what you say, while I do give a crap what a dictionary from Cambridge says.

It's a bad choice of words either way. It should be abundantly clear, however, what he means after he posted several definitions from multiple sources. Going back to the Cambridge Idiom Dictionary is meaningless. As you can see from all the other sources, the idiom dictionary is the only one that suggests the actions are "deserved" rather than "invited."

"Asking for it" IS an idiom, so what idiom dictionaries have to say about it is relevant. Idiom dictionaries give the definition regarding usage, how it's taken.

It's quite obvious that MG is saying that the terrorist attacks are a "foreseeable response," as reprehensible as it is, to US foreign policy.

So you're speaking for MG now, are you? It's quite obvious that he is insisting that the innocent people who were targeted and died on 9-11 were "asking for it." His words.

Posted

Yes. Al Qaeda was so upset over our past history, being such a humanitarian, charitable organization to Muslims at large, never mind infidels, they engaged in BLOWBACK. They care so much about other countries.

Oh some sarcasm from AW. Good good. So, with the CIA currently doing covert operations in Iran to try and destabilize the country from within. Do you think that might generate some angst against the USA? Don't you think that these covert operations could come back to bite you in the ass?

Do you ever think that actions lead to consequences? Do you ever ask yourself or think about the stupid questions you put forth to the rest of us on this board? Do you even have a slight understanding about the thread's premise at all?? Of course not. The proof is in your next statement.

But yes. It was "actions taken by the USA" previous to 9-11 that caused babies to be targeted and killed. I repeat. "The USA." While Canada shined it's well-deserved halo. And if only it weren't for those actions, al Qaeda would have remained the peace loving, charitable, giving organization that it's so well known for. The Devil made them do it.

:rolleyes:

Guest American Woman
Posted

Oh some sarcasm from AW. Good good.

Thank you. I thought it rather appropriate myself. :)

Posted

Poland was 'asking for it' too. Had they only been more kind to the Germans...

:P

What kind of covert operations was Poland doing in Germany? Yeah, another fail.

Some really terrible comparisons here folks.

Posted

Still waiting for Haitians to bomb Montreal.

More 'Canada' .....

We can revisit all this after the next terror attack on the USA. WHY DID WE GET ATTACKED, !!!??!?!?!?!?!?!?

WHAT'S BLOWBACK?? Why are more buildings falling to the ground? Why DID the new attack come in the form of a mushroom cloud???

Guest American Woman
Posted

Sure sure, attack me and not the argument. Typical, do your best.

That's quite hilarious coming from you. :lol:

Do you ever ask yourself or think about the stupid questions you put forth to the rest of us on this board? Do you even have a slight understanding about the thread's premise at all?? Of course not.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,898
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Flora smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...