Jump to content

Postal Strike Imminent


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 551
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Actually I do. If you think there is a need that can only be filled by one provider, then you don't know what your talking about. It ain;t rocket science...and even then, NASA has competition...

Actually, you don't know what you're talking about. A system that requires massive capital investment and infrastructure to function, such as rural postal delivery is only profitable when operated as a monopoly. Hydro-electricity and landlines are the same idea. If there were no Canada post, who do you think is going to bother delivering mail to remote communities? UPS, FedEx, and DHL would charge such an astronomical rate to send things there that it would be crippling to people in those communities, if they got service at all. Your point is completely valid when it comes to cities or areas where there's a concentrated population. Unfortunately, a country this size requires service to remote areas too.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possibly, since a private delivery company will only operate where there's profit to be made.

That's not true. A company will absolutely operate even if there's not a current profit to be made. Many companies, at least the good ones, think ahead.

Take Toyota. They currently produce the Prius at a net loss. But they produce it for market share, and future profit potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That doesn't mean that any of that would continue without the existence of the corporation, as this rote would not be nearly profitable.

As I've already stated, private companies already offer goods and services that they don't directly profit from. Toyota with its hybrid vehicles. Staples with laptops and desktop computers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take Toyota. They currently produce the Prius at a net loss.

That's a stupid business model. Ford now produces every single car line at a profit. They didn't in the past.

Now as for Canada Post - I should clarify. It isn't the post office itself that's important, but the distribution system. If some kind of private system, regulated and mandated by government were to take over, I really wouldn't care. There needs to be some kind of system though that ensures that packages and letters (and there are still a great many of those) are delivered at least twice weekly (we currently get 3 times a week) to every community in Canada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The post office here is run out of a house and is delivered to by a contract driver. That doesn't mean that any of that would continue without the existence of the corporation, as this rote would not be nearly profitable.

Then consolidate routes and reduce delivery days until it is profitable. Daily weekday mail delivery is not a necessity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I've already stated, private companies already offer goods and services that they don't directly profit from. Toyota with its hybrid vehicles. Staples with laptops and desktop computers.

Those are different (and questionable) business models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then consolidate routes and reduce delivery days until it is profitable. Daily weekday mail delivery is not a necessity.

We only get mail 3 times a week. Any less than twice and credit cards (not that you need to use the mail to pay those or see the statements) and other bills would start to be paid late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And no, Ford doesn't make a profit on all the vehicles they make. At least no counting the government tax credits on them.

Yes they do actually. Ford's hybrid program is now profitable. Alan Mulally has said as much. Unless you have evidence to the contrary....

Edited by Smallc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We only get mail 3 times a week. Any less than twice and credit cards (not that you need to use the mail to pay those or see the statements) and other bills would start to be paid late.

Then it can be reduced even further...to weekly. Many years ago, military service members could go months without receiving their post and packages to no ill effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're trolling, right? Retailers selling loss-leaders doesn't compare to the postal industry.

Why not? It's the same thing. Especially considering keeping open a small office in a small community, when the community is only going to grow, is a future money-maker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not? It's the same thing. Especially considering keeping open a small office in a small community, when the community is only going to grow, is a future money-maker.

That's not what a loss-leader does.

You buy a printer at cost or below cost because the retailer and the companies make money on the ink... a lot of money.

You buy razor handles at or below cost because the retailer and the manufacturer make all their money on the disposable blades.

You buy electric power tools only marginally above cost because companies make their money on the accessories.

So, explain to me how that model works with a post office that provides a service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We only get mail 3 times a week. Any less than twice and credit cards (not that you need to use the mail to pay those or see the statements) and other bills would start to be paid late.

I'd really start a rebellion if I were you. I have lived in Alberta and now live in BC and there isn't a single bill I get that doesn't give me more than 2 weeks notification from the time I receive it. Although I admit that other than Visa and my health care bill, I now get everything else via e-mail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, you don't know what you're talking about. A system that requires massive capital investment and infrastructure to function, such as rural postal delivery is only profitable when operated as a monopoly.

So Fed Ex had no competition?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The post office here is run out of a house and is delivered to by a contract driver. That doesn't mean that any of that would continue without the existence of the corporation, as this rote would not be nearly profitable.

And it doesn't mean that it wouldn't either...at a profit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, you don't know what you're talking about. A system that requires massive capital investment and infrastructure to function, such as rural postal delivery is only profitable when operated as a monopoly. Hydro-electricity and landlines are the same idea. If there were no Canada post, who do you think is going to bother delivering mail to remote communities? UPS, FedEx, and DHL would charge such an astronomical rate to send things there that it would be crippling to people in those communities, if they got service at all. Your point is completely valid when it comes to cities or areas where there's a concentrated population. Unfortunately, a country this size requires service to remote areas too.

When was the last time you...mailed a letter that wasn't a greeting card or a bill?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Fed Ex had no competition?

As Smallc already said, they don't deliver everywhere like Canada Post. In fact, I can't even get UPS to deliver to me in Fredericton. They pass it off to Canada Post for delivery here and it's the capitol of New Brunswick. Now whether that's due to some sort of "deal" or whatnot, I don't know. It's still the case that remote areas do not get service from these companies. They do the same thing and pass it off to Canada Post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Smallc already said, they don't deliver everywhere like Canada Post.

And he is incorrect, but nevertheless, FEDeX delivers millions of units a day, has had massive amounts of capital infusions by investors and operates in a competition rich enviroment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Completely irrelevant. I still receive plenty of important correspondence through the mail.

Then nothing you receive by mail cannot be replaced by email. Hence as a business model, the post office is in a terminal phase. The only area where it can survive is parcel delivery, and it is protected unfairly against rate based competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Smallc already said, they don't deliver everywhere like Canada Post.

Yes, because it doesn't make sense for them to offer a service in a small location that already has a Canada Post. The ridiculous premise that if there wasn't a Canada Post, there'd be no service makes no sense at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,722
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    phoenyx75
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • User went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • User went up a rank
      Contributor
    • User earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Fluffypants earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...