Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Where's those WMDs again?

Apparently not in Iraq. When Bush decided to implement his plan, which had been construed long before, the UN was saying we need months more to complete inspections. Up to thenb they found nothing more than a few mustard gas shells. Which were destroyed under UN supervision. Bush was going in there regardless of anything to do with UN resolutions or international laws.

  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

But Saddam refused inspections for 4 years. That was a violation of the ceasefire he agreed to. Military action could have resumed that very second.

Yeah but its the UNSC that enforces UN resolutions not random coalitions of the stupid.

I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger

Posted

Good question. An even better question is why would someone refuse weapons inspections for four years if they had no weapons? Kind of a dumb thing to do don't you think?

It would be a dumb thing, if that were what really happened. Actual UN weapons inspectors say the US was lying about this.

Posted

It would be a dumb thing, if that were what really happened. Actual UN weapons inspectors say the US was lying about this.

Sorry, that's just not true.

Posted

Yeah but its the UNSC that enforces UN resolutions not random coalitions of the stupid.

What do they enforce resolutions with? Dudes in blue helmets?

Posted

UN weapons inspectors only resumed their work after the UK/US massed military force in the region. UNMOVIC and IAEA reported some progress but continued obstruction. Final warnings for compliance in March 2003 were met with more obstruction. So the "obstruction" was removed.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

UN weapons inspectors only resumed their work after the UK/US massed military force in the region. UNMOVIC and IAEA reported some progress but continued obstruction. Final warnings for compliance in March 2003 were met with more obstruction. So the "obstruction" was removed.

Apparently you have yor time line a little f'ed up. The troops sailed into the Med based on a plan that had long since been conceived by a couple or more war criminals on the other side of the ocean. Let's see, I think you assume at least two of their names for some weird reason.

Posted

Yes it is true.

Not at all. It's common knowledge and accepted facts that Saddam refused inspections from 1998 to 2002. You're a denier.

Posted

What do they enforce resolutions with? Dudes in blue helmets?

I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger

Posted

If the Nuremberg laws were applied, then every post-war American president would have been hanged.

- Noam Chomsky.

Still true after all these years.

Unlimited economic growth has the marvelous quality of stilling discontent while preserving privilege, a fact that has not gone unnoticed among liberal economists.

- Noam Chomsky

It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.

- Upton Sinclair

Posted (edited)

Sorry, that's just not true.

Yes it is.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-149938/UN-weapons-inspectors-search-Iraqi-presidential-palace.html

http://english.people.com.cn/200212/03/eng20021203_107881.shtml

http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,397432,00.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1418933/UN-inspectors-raid-Saddams-palace.html

And all of those articles are just about the palaces, which were off-limits to the inspectors previously. The inspectors were investigating the rest of the country in the years prior though. In short, Hussein was allowing weapons inspections in the country but didn't allow investigators into his palaces. Before the invasion, he did open up the palaces however. The inspectors found nothing and the United States invaded anyway. Then the United States found nothing following their invasion.

Now Iraq is falling to ISIS. Heckuva job, Donald. At least your companies got paid.

Edited by cybercoma
Posted

ISIS thanks the US government for leaving behind a plethora of equipment and arms. All that stuff the US said was going to be too expensive to ship back home is now in the hands of a terrorist group. Making them more powerful than some nations' military.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,897
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Ana Silva
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...