bush_cheney2004 Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 I already explained exactly why its still illegal. Why dont you try reading the posts? Then you and your ilk have failed to win the day...try harder. Thats just a moronic strawman. No...it is fact. I cant unilaterally change laws. Use the power of dope. Utterly irrelevant. Laws should be based on real evidence, and that is the only test case we have so far. Ever heard of Mexico? Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
bush_cheney2004 Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 ....Prohibition really does seem to be just going on inertia notwithstanding the efforts of Rob Nicholsons and Vic Teows of the world to keep pushing it. Excuse me, but other nations have taken on such prohibitions, including the United States of America (e.g. California). So what's Canada's problem? Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Guest TrueMetis Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 Salt is'nt banned... Takes a helluva lot less salt to kill someone than it does weed. Quote
Shady Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 You do realize of course how attitudes like your's only contribute to the state's sense that it has the right to intrude as far as it wants into whatever facet of our lives it chooses too? Nope. It's up to all of us. If voter's feel it should be legalized, it will be. If voter's feel otherwise, it won't. Yes, of course. Everything that is unhealthy is already banned. I never said that. Great strawman again. But cheez whiz isn't a carcinogen Einstein. Takes a helluva lot less salt to kill someone than it does weed. How so? Or is this like when asked about the levels of 50 substances, and you came back with nothing? Quote
eyeball Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 Excuse me, but other nations have taken on such prohibitions, including the United States of America (e.g. California). So what's Canada's problem? I told you, Rob Nicholson and Vic Teows. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
bush_cheney2004 Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 I told you, Rob Nicholson and Vic Teows. Are they bigger than Pat Robertson in Canada? Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
eyeball Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 Nope. It's up to all of us. If voter's feel it should be legalized, it will be. If voter's feel otherwise, it won't. Well yes, we all contribute something to the process, but what you bring in particular to it is of real concern. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
dre Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 Are they bigger than Pat Robertson in Canada? What a pathetic little troll. Quote I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger
dre Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 Then you and your ilk have failed to win the day...try harder. No...it is fact. Use the power of dope. Ever heard of Mexico? No...it is fact. No its just another strawman by a sad little troll. youre pretending that others think the pat robertson thing is a big deal, but nobody does. Youre having an argument with imaginary voices inside your head... again. Quote I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger
bush_cheney2004 Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 What a pathetic little troll. This thread is about Pat Robertson...try to show some restraint. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
eyeball Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 Are they bigger than Pat Robertson in Canada? I don't know, does that even matter? Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
dre Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 (edited) I don't know, does that even matter? Yeah... the imaginary voice inside his head, is telling him that Pat Robertsons opinion is very important to Canadians, and hes not gonna be pushed around by ANY of his multiple personalities so hes taking a stand! Edited December 31, 2010 by dre Quote I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger
Jack Weber Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 No its just another strawman by a sad little troll. youre pretending that others think the pat robertson thing is a big deal, but nobody does. Youre having an argument with imaginary voices inside your head... again. Wait until Miss Saskatchewan call us "wig wearers"... Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
bush_cheney2004 Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 I don't know, does that even matter? You tell me...a member here thought enough of Mr. Robertson's comments to start this thread without any mention of Mr. Nicholson or Teows. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
eyeball Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 You tell me...a member here thought enough of Mr. Robertson's comments to start this thread without any mention of Mr. Nicholson or Teows. No, that doesn't matter to me either. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
bush_cheney2004 Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 No, that doesn't matter to me either. Okay, so that leaves us with an inconsequential evangelical from another country and two men preventing the will of "75%" of Canadians wishing to decrim or legalize dope. ...and of course one more thread here about the same, unchanging topic. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Sir Bandelot Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 Indeed. The only Robertson I know invented the screwdriver. Quote
dre Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 Okay, so that leaves us with an inconsequential evangelical from another country and two men preventing the will of "75%" of Canadians wishing to decrim or legalize dope. ...and of course one more thread here about the same, unchanging topic. Thats another huge strawman. Nobody is saying that except for voices inside your head. Say hi to all your multiple personalities for me! Happy new year to each and every one of you! Quote I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger
Jack Weber Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 Indeed. The only Robertson I know invented the screwdriver. Speaking of Screwdrivers.... I don't really like Vodka because I had a bad experience with drinking too many Screwdrivers once... Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
eyeball Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 Okay, so that leaves us with an inconsequential evangelical from another country and two men preventing the will of "75%" of Canadians wishing to decrim or legalize dope. ...and of course one more thread here about the same, unchanging topic. Okay you win. I know that's all that really matters. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
Jack Weber Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 Thats another huge strawman. Nobody is saying that except for voices inside your head. Say hi to all your multiple personalities for me! Happy new year to each and every one of you! "Oh Yeah!! Well... Manifest Destiny!!! American Exceptionalism!!! Eff the Queen,wig wearers!!! Stupid vicarious Americans!!! Take that and stick it in your British Empire teapot!!!" Wait for the "So much for putting me on ignore" comment... Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
bush_cheney2004 Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 (edited) Okay you win. I know that's all that really matters. There is no winning or losing here....just the endless dance. Does anyone really know the true meaning of Christmas...or why Canadians can't decrim dope after decades of constant bitching? I mean...come on....Pat Effing Robertson? That's just pathetic. Edited December 31, 2010 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
dre Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 (edited) There is no winning or losing here....just the endless dance. Does anyone really know the true meaning of Christmas...or why Canadians can't decrim dope after decades of constant bitching? That was explained to both of you very clearly. I mean...come on....Pat Effing Robertson? That's just pathetic. Still arguing with yourself huh? Edited December 31, 2010 by dre Quote I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger
Guest TrueMetis Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 How so? Or is this like when asked about the levels of 50 substances, and you came back with nothing? Some studies say a person would have to smoke about 1500 pounds of pot in 14 minutes to die. My link Which is in line with other studies that say pot has a 1000:1 safety ratio, ie you would have to smoke 1000 times the amount it takes to induce a therapeutic response to kill you. My link While it only take about 560 grams of salt to kill a man. So I'll try to smoke 1500 pounds of pot you eat a bowl of salt and we'll see what happens, just make sure you phone 911 first. As for the carcinogens as I said the source you linked doesn't give what the carcinogens are it doesn't even say for sure that weed contains all these carcinogens, or in what amount. That's the problem with not having standards, if grown properly it is entirely possible there would be no carcinogens in the pot. The carcinogens could be from how or where it was grown or dried. Anyway you made the cancer claim so it up to you to prove it. Quote
Jack Weber Posted December 31, 2010 Report Posted December 31, 2010 Some studies say a person would have to smoke about 1500 pounds of pot in 14 minutes to die. My link Which is in line with other studies that say pot has a 1000:1 safety ratio, ie you would have to smoke 1000 times the amount it takes to induce a therapeutic response to kill you. My link While it only take about 560 grams of salt to kill a man. So I'll try to smoke 1500 pounds of pot you eat a bowl of salt and we'll see what happens, just make sure you phone 911 first. As for the carcinogens as I said the source you linked doesn't give what the carcinogens are it doesn't even say for sure that weed contains all these carcinogens, or in what amount. That's the problem with not having standards, if grown properly it is entirely possible there would be no carcinogens in the pot. The carcinogens could be from how or where it was grown or dried. Anyway you made the cancer claim so it up to you to prove it. Oh..Do NOT go down the 'You prove it" road with The Professor... I've tried that and it simply does'nt work.Not only because he won't be able to,but because,he'll inexplicably turn it around and say it's up to you to prove it... Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.