Topaz Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 Wiki leaks is reporting that Saudi Arabia supports terrorists through financial support. Is this new, not really. I've read in the past, that the Royal family, half hates the US and the other half loves the US through the Bush Family and its business dealings with them and the Carlyle Group. So by reading this report , one knows that NATO is fighting more than AL Qaeda, the Taliban or any other terrorist group. The west can't win this war in Afghanistan or any other country when you have other rich countries supporting your enemy. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/05/wikileaks-cables-saudi-terrorist-funding Quote
Jack Weber Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 Wiki leaks is reporting that Saudi Arabia supports terrorists through financial support. Is this new, not really. I've read in the past, that the Royal family, half hates the US and the other half loves the US through the Bush Family and its business dealings with them and the Carlyle Group. So by reading this report , one knows that NATO is fighting more than AL Qaeda, the Taliban or any other terrorist group. The west can't win this war in Afghanistan or any other country when you have other rich countries supporting your enemy. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/05/wikileaks-cables-saudi-terrorist-funding I agree we cannot defeat Islamofascism by fighting a war in Afghanistan... We should have long ago taken this war to the epicentre of radical Islamic thought.... Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
Shakeyhands Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 I agree we cannot defeat Islamofascism by fighting a war in Afghanistan... We should have long ago taken this war to the epicentre of radical Islamic thought.... Imagine the low gas prices afterwards! Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Sir Bandelot Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 Yes but the kings and princes of radical (and herectical) wahhabism are a more powerful enemy. Much easier to attack and blow up poor people with broken kalishnikovs. Quote
maple_leafs182 Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 Saudi funds terrorist, America fights a war on terrorism, America needs oil to fuel their war machine, they buy oil from the Saudis. The Saudis want war, they make a lot of money off war. Quote │ _______ [███STOP███]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ :::::::--------------Conservatives beleive ▄▅█FUNDING THIS█▅▄▃▂- - - - - --- -- -- -- -------- Liberals lie I██████████████████] ...◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙'(='.'=)' ⊙
bush_cheney2004 Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 (edited) Saudi funds terrorist, America fights a war on terrorism, America needs oil to fuel their war machine, they buy oil from the Saudis. The Saudis want war, they make a lot of money off war. Not as much as Canada.....oil and war. Edited December 6, 2010 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Economics trumps Virtue. Â
bill_barilko Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 Yes but the kings and princes of radical (and herectical) wahhabism are a more powerful enemy. Much easier to attack and blow up poor people with broken kalishnikovs. Actually some Taliban are still using Lee-Enfield 303's the same gun my Dad used to blast Bear & Moose with back in the day. Quote
Oleg Bach Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 I agree we cannot defeat Islamofascism by fighting a war in Afghanistan... We should have long ago taken this war to the epicentre of radical Islamic thought.... It's Saudi oil facism..that works hand in hand with American oil facism. Anyone with a brain always knew our so-called Saudi oil buddies where doing business with one hand and with the other hand were sliding cash to those that like to destroy great buildings in New York. This has nothing to do with religion ...it's all about domination...whether it be a high ranking banker or oil guy..or some jerk in a robe cruising along in his 100 thousand dollar car...dreaming of ways of chopping off the hands of the poor that might steal bread. All Wikileak has done is confirm to a certain degree that so-called people in high places in the east and west conspire to screw us. Quote
sharkman Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 Mr. Wiki obviously has some kind of mental disorder. A disorder and a computer, amazing what can be done, eh? Quote
Oleg Bach Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 Mr. Wiki obviously has some kind of mental disorder. A disorder and a computer, amazing what can be done, eh? Yah when most of the rats in the world depend on bigger rats that are liars - cheats - theives and murdering bastards...to survive...then Mr. Wiki would be abnormal as compared to the norm..It is much like one ant in the ant hill - one ant out of a million...say - all the other ants are blind and have no sense of smell...THEN that one ant that can see and speak..shows the rest of the ants where the life sustaining food can be found - That messiah ant will be loathed and dispised and hated...BUT - the hater ants in the end are totally dependent on the single messiah ant...The odd one singular...that is the saviour but strange to the mass - will be considered evil..and out of the norm. The world desperately needs brave individuals to adjust society to bring it back into a state of reality..which means liars must be exposed if we are to surive in the long run..YOU might not like this medicine but you NEED it. Quote
Oleg Bach Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 Yes but the kings and princes of radical (and herectical) wahhabism are a more powerful enemy. Much easier to attack and blow up poor people with broken kalishnikovs. You must not attack the Princes and Kings - because our oil merchants do buisness with them...and those merchants really don't care if the world trade genocide took place - they did not give a damn about the "little people" - when a billion gallons of crude posioned the food supply in the Gulf of Mexico. That is the way it works..our business elite and the politicains they support and sometimes control - are fine with generating wealth and status out of OUR enemy. Quote
Topaz Posted December 6, 2010 Author Report Posted December 6, 2010 If yuou read this report, it will tell you that Canada is the largest seller to the US for oil and that Saudis Arabia is second. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080415010554AAJ9Rn7 Quote
GostHacked Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 Wiki leaks is reporting that Saudi Arabia supports terrorists through financial support. Is this new, not really. I've read in the past, that the Royal family, half hates the US and the other half loves the US through the Bush Family and its business dealings with them and the Carlyle Group. So by reading this report , one knows that NATO is fighting more than AL Qaeda, the Taliban or any other terrorist group. The west can't win this war in Afghanistan or any other country when you have other rich countries supporting your enemy. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/05/wikileaks-cables-saudi-terrorist-funding I am surprised people are surprised by this !!! Quote Google : Webster Griffin Tarpley, Gerald Celente, Max Keiser ohm on soundcloud.com
bloodyminded Posted December 7, 2010 Report Posted December 7, 2010 Yes but the kings and princes of radical (and herectical) wahhabism are a more powerful enemy. Much easier to attack and blow up poor people with broken kalishnikovs. Zing. Quote As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand. --Josh Billings
M.Dancer Posted December 7, 2010 Report Posted December 7, 2010 I am surprised people are surprised by this !!! I'm not. Topaz often writes gibberish. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
GostHacked Posted December 7, 2010 Report Posted December 7, 2010 I'm not. Topaz often writes gibberish. Since you are a mocker, this means Topaz is speaking the truth. Quote Google : Webster Griffin Tarpley, Gerald Celente, Max Keiser ohm on soundcloud.com
M.Dancer Posted December 7, 2010 Report Posted December 7, 2010 Since you are a mocker, this means Topaz is speaking the truth. Mocking is not synonymous for opposites day. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
GostHacked Posted December 7, 2010 Report Posted December 7, 2010 Mocking is not synonymous for opposites day. And people say I smoke too much dope. Quote Google : Webster Griffin Tarpley, Gerald Celente, Max Keiser ohm on soundcloud.com
dre Posted December 7, 2010 Report Posted December 7, 2010 Yup. A known state terrorism sponsor lobbying the US government into committing American taxpayers to pay for a war in Iran... and people shouldnt know about Quote I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger
M.Dancer Posted December 7, 2010 Report Posted December 7, 2010 Yup. A known state terrorism sponsor lobbying the US government into committing American taxpayers to pay for a war in Iran... and people shouldnt know about I hope you relaize that is not what the article says or implies, that the Kingdom (State) of Suadi Arabia is funding terrorists... WHat you are insinuating could have been said 20 years ago about the US....that the United States is the largest sponsor of the IRA. And of course if someone said it is the state sponsoring the Irish terrorists, they would have been incorrect as you are now. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Oleg Bach Posted December 7, 2010 Report Posted December 7, 2010 Saudi Arabia and others are like drug dealers who grow rich on selling oil to the highly addicted - and like drug dealers they might be polite to the customers they service - but in private the hate and loath them _ I am sure there were a lot of smug looks in the silk lined tents the day of 9 11. So what's so surprising in the fact that Wikileaks has shown that our best business partners in the middle east are also our mortal enemies _ I guess those addicted to money in the west are also control like crack heads by big bucks. Quote
dre Posted December 7, 2010 Report Posted December 7, 2010 (edited) I hope you relaize that is not what the article says or implies, that the Kingdom (State) of Suadi Arabia is funding terrorists... WHat you are insinuating could have been said 20 years ago about the US....that the United States is the largest sponsor of the IRA. And of course if someone said it is the state sponsoring the Irish terrorists, they would have been incorrect as you are now. The Saudi Kingdom has been a major source of terrorism funding for decades. The only thing thats changed is since 911 they have to be more careful about it, so the money is funneled using non-governmental channels. The Saudi government has been the principal financial backer of Afghanistan' s odious Taliban movement since at least 1996. It has also channeled funds to Hamas and other groups that have committed terrorist acts in Israel and other portions of the Middle East.Worst of all, the Saudi monarchy has funded dubious schools and "charities" throughout the Islamic world. Those organizations have been hotbeds of anti-Western, and especially, anti-American, indoctrination. The schools, for example, not only indoctrinate students in a virulent and extreme form of Islam, but also teach them to hate secular Western values. One meeting was enough for Saddam Hussein to get branded a terrorist collaborator The Saudi Governments long history of direct and indirect funding isnt quite enough it seems. Wonder why? cough cough. Edited December 7, 2010 by dre Quote I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger
Oleg Bach Posted December 7, 2010 Report Posted December 7, 2010 The Saudi Shemite inbreds are a nasty looking bunch - they are even more ugly and evil looking than the Nazi artistic portrayal of Jews...I always go by what I see..if it looks evil is almost always is..but these guys who are not even capable of growing enough food to sustain themselves..should have been invaded and ALL their damned oil should have been taken by us...besides - they do not know what to do with great wealth other than finance bombings - chop of hands and stone woman..so what's the big deal - get rid of them - they would get rid of us if they had someone else that could continue to enrich them by buying oil. Do I sound severe? Quote
Oleg Bach Posted December 7, 2010 Report Posted December 7, 2010 People who believe themselves just say "I have nothing to hide" - those that want others to believe they are just seem to have a lot to hide. Quote
M.Dancer Posted December 7, 2010 Report Posted December 7, 2010 The Saudi Kingdom has been a major source of terrorism funding for decades. The only thing thats changed is since 911 they have to be more careful about it, so the money is funneled using non-governmental channels. Not sure where of the dozens of unauthoritative blogs you snipped that quote, but it is dated. Any chance of an authoritative citation for the claim they are more careful about the funding, or is that simply a guess? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.