Black Dog Posted March 22, 2010 Report Posted March 22, 2010 It's getting a bit passé now. To you maybe. But then, I'm pretty sure you are straight, so your opinion on the subject isn't really relevant. Quote
g_bambino Posted March 22, 2010 Report Posted March 22, 2010 To you maybe. But then, I'm pretty sure you are straight, so your opinion on the subject isn't really relevant. Presumptuous and dismissive! Well done. Quote
LesActive Posted March 22, 2010 Report Posted March 22, 2010 celebrate! Quote A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?
Black Dog Posted March 23, 2010 Report Posted March 23, 2010 Presumptuous and dismissive! Well done. Thank you. Quote
Mr.Canada Posted March 23, 2010 Author Report Posted March 23, 2010 You are a troll and an idiot. That aside, the failure to ban you doesn't mean I wouldn't welcome your departure. Please keep all flames and off topic discussion reserved to the thread outlined in my sig. Thank you. Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
Smallc Posted March 23, 2010 Report Posted March 23, 2010 Mr. Canada....you don't control the discussion. Please, stop telling the rest of us what to do. Quote
Mr.Canada Posted March 23, 2010 Author Report Posted March 23, 2010 Toronto Gay Pride parade, which is notorious for its inclusion of full frontal nudity and public sex acts by homosexualsSource "Our governments will now line up and spew out millions of dollars for a sex parade" Source As we can see from these snips I'm not alone in the demanding we stop funding this public sex show with tax payer dollars. There are homeless sleeping on the streets and the ysay they have no money yet throw it away at decadence like this. Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
Mr.Canada Posted March 23, 2010 Author Report Posted March 23, 2010 Mr. Canada....you don't control the discussion. Please, stop telling the rest of us what to do. It is against the rules to flame people in these topics. If people arent going to follow the rules then I'll at least set aside a place for them to flame me while trying to keep these topics clean. Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
Smallc Posted March 23, 2010 Report Posted March 23, 2010 It's also against the rules to troll, but you do that regularly. It's hard to take you serious. Quote
Mr.Canada Posted March 23, 2010 Author Report Posted March 23, 2010 It's also against the rules to troll, but you do that regularly. It's hard to take you serious. A response to this off topic portion of the discussion was moved here. Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
charter.rights Posted March 23, 2010 Report Posted March 23, 2010 (edited) A response to this off topic portion of the discussion was moved here. Of course you seem so paranoid that you cannot differentiate between a response countering your feeble opinions and a personal attack on your character. Maybe you should just walk away if you can't take the heat. All your opinions are highly questionable. Edited March 23, 2010 by charter.rights Quote “Safeguarding the rights of others is the most noble and beautiful end of a human being.” Kahlil Gibran “Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.” Albert Einstein
scorpio Posted March 23, 2010 Report Posted March 23, 2010 Also I want to show the silent majority what our tax dollars are funding. As a Christian, why don't you take up a real cause and film abortions at hospitals. They do over 100,000 a year and are funded by our tax dollars. Quote
kimmy Posted March 23, 2010 Report Posted March 23, 2010 "Useful" in what sense? You seem to be under the impression that Pride was intended to be a way of garnering mainstream support. It's not. It's a political performance to counter the enforced social invisibility and legal censure endured by the queer community for decades. Hence the outrageous, confrontational and over-the-top imagery traditionally associated with the event. I'm aware that historically there was a need to prove that "we're here" (as the slogan goes). But hasn't the need for "outrageous, confrontational, and over-the-top imagery" kind of disappeared? Hasn't the "enforced social invisibility" completely evaporated? It seems to me that the biggest issues facing gays right now aren't invisibility and legal issues, they're prejudice and bigotry and the views of people like Mr C... and I think the feather boas and dongs act does more harm than good. I'd also suggest that considering the promotion of Pride as a family event, an invitation to straight Canadians to participate and express their support (I think the word "allies" was mentioned...) I think that yeah, it does seem kind of like Pride is intended as a way of gathering mainstream support. That might not have been the historical reason for it, but it seems like that's the current reason for it. -k Quote (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ﾉ(° -°ﾉ)
Mr.Canada Posted March 23, 2010 Author Report Posted March 23, 2010 As a Christian, why don't you take up a real cause and film abortions at hospitals. They do over 100,000 a year and are funded by our tax dollars. I'm of the opinion that public sex where children are present is wrong and I view documenting this on video tape to be a worthwhile cause. I'll be distributing this to government, media, focus groups and all corporate sponsorship. I'm disturbed that people are actually arguing against my stance...it's quite troubling. Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
charter.rights Posted March 23, 2010 Report Posted March 23, 2010 I'm of the opinion that public sex where children are present is wrong and I view documenting this on video tape to be a worthwhile cause. I'll be distributing this to government, media, focus groups and all corporate sponsorship. I'm disturbed that people are actually arguing against my stance...it's quite troubling. "....and I view documenting this on video tape to be a worthwhile cause. I'll be distributing this to government, media, focus groups and all corporate sponsorship." and keeping a private copy for his own personal viewing.... Quote “Safeguarding the rights of others is the most noble and beautiful end of a human being.” Kahlil Gibran “Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.” Albert Einstein
GostHacked Posted March 23, 2010 Report Posted March 23, 2010 Mr Canada, are you ok with a couple lesbians doing it in front of everyone or are you just targeting gay males? Quote
Black Dog Posted March 23, 2010 Report Posted March 23, 2010 I'm aware that historically there was a need to prove that "we're here" (as the slogan goes). But hasn't the need for "outrageous, confrontational, and over-the-top imagery" kind of disappeared? Hasn't the "enforced social invisibility" completely evaporated? It seems to me that the biggest issues facing gays right now aren't invisibility and legal issues, they're prejudice and bigotry and the views of people like Mr C... and I think the feather boas and dongs act does more harm than good. I'd also suggest that considering the promotion of Pride as a family event, an invitation to straight Canadians to participate and express their support (I think the word "allies" was mentioned...) I think that yeah, it does seem kind of like Pride is intended as a way of gathering mainstream support. That might not have been the historical reason for it, but it seems like that's the current reason for it. -k If that's the case that's probably why the outrageous sexuality has disappeared and been replaced by totally straight bank employees waving awkwardly from the corporate sponsor floats. Quote
Mr.Canada Posted March 25, 2010 Author Report Posted March 25, 2010 Mr Canada, are you ok with a couple lesbians doing it in front of everyone or are you just targeting gay males? All sexual contact in public is unacceptable. Doing so in a place where children will be makes it even worse. I don't see how people can disagree with me on this point. Having sex in front of children is akin to child abuse. If it were to happen in a private home the children would be taken away and the adults charged, I don't see how it should be any different in this setting. Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
Jack Weber Posted March 26, 2010 Report Posted March 26, 2010 "....and I view documenting this on video tape to be a worthwhile cause. I'll be distributing this to government, media, focus groups and all corporate sponsorship." and keeping a private copy for his own personal viewing.... While pilfering the local stores of KY and Kleenex.... Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
ToadBrother Posted March 26, 2010 Report Posted March 26, 2010 In To there are homosexuals arm locked with anti Israel people goose stepping down the street. Blatant anti Semitism and not to mention public sex going on. That's right homosexuals having sexual contact right on our streets, in public, for our children to see. Male on male oral sex, male on male anal penetration. Males leading each other around by the penis bolts that so many of them have these days. Also lesbians fingering each other and breast sucking. I've seen all these things. This is inappropriate behavior and I plan to make it very public. So watch for it. So tell me. How much will you be charging for it? I recommend you sell it online, with precisely the above description. You could be a millionaire by this time next year. Mr. Canada, uber-conservative and porn king! Quote
ToadBrother Posted March 26, 2010 Report Posted March 26, 2010 All sexual contact in public is unacceptable. Doing so in a place where children will be makes it even worse. I don't see how people can disagree with me on this point. Having sex in front of children is akin to child abuse. If it were to happen in a private home the children would be taken away and the adults charged, I don't see how it should be any different in this setting. You are aware that in the not so distant bed, in some places, children shared the marital bed with parents, and the parents kept having children. Quote
Jack Weber Posted March 26, 2010 Report Posted March 26, 2010 You are aware that in the not so distant bed, in some places, children shared the marital bed with parents, and the parents kept having children. Oh you did'nt... NNNNNNNNNNNNNooooooooooooo!!! Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
eyeball Posted March 26, 2010 Report Posted March 26, 2010 You mean, Mom and Dad weren't just wrestling? Ewwwww! Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
ToadBrother Posted March 26, 2010 Report Posted March 26, 2010 You mean, Mom and Dad weren't just wrestling? Ewwwww! With a moniker like "eyeball", I'd figure you would have known better than the rest of us! Quote
GostHacked Posted March 26, 2010 Report Posted March 26, 2010 All sexual contact in public is unacceptable. Doing so in a place where children will be makes it even worse. I don't see how people can disagree with me on this point. Having sex in front of children is akin to child abuse. If it were to happen in a private home the children would be taken away and the adults charged, I don't see how it should be any different in this setting. I walked in on my parents one day doing the nasty. Scared for life. </sarcasm> Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.