M.Dancer Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 Did anyone know that the judge was a long time time Conservative, appointed to the bench by none other than Jim Flaherty? Or that the Conservative MP for the riding worked for 20 years in the very Orangeville courthouse that Jaffer got his plea bargain? Also the prosecuter was recently the moderator of a debate on status of women's issues in Orangeville. Who is the minister of state for status of women again? Does anyone know a source to back up these claims? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Argus Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 I must agree. A cabinet members husband, and former MP gets a very nice break that most of us would never get. You're quite mistaken. First time offenders are routinely given breaks on crimes a lot worse than posession. For that matter, even people with long criminal records are routinely given breaks on crimes a lot worse than posession. People have been given sentences of house arrest for rape and murder, and you're astonished that a well-heeled, respectable member of the community wasn't slammed into prison because a cop found a bit of coke in his car? What planet have you been living on? Jaffer is clearly a hypocrite, and now unelectable in any position. His political career is done, and he is most unlikely to even get a cushy appointment to anything as a consolation prize. Thus his punishment for his cocaine use will be considerably worse than that of most people. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Jerry J. Fortin Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 You're quite mistaken. First time offenders are routinely given breaks on crimes a lot worse than posession. For that matter, even people with long criminal records are routinely given breaks on crimes a lot worse than posession. People have been given sentences of house arrest for rape and murder, and you're astonished that a well-heeled, respectable member of the community wasn't slammed into prison because a cop found a bit of coke in his car? What planet have you been living on? Jaffer is clearly a hypocrite, and now unelectable in any position. His political career is done, and he is most unlikely to even get a cushy appointment to anything as a consolation prize. Thus his punishment for his cocaine use will be considerably worse than that of most people. How many folks do you know or have heard of that walked from a failed breath test? Quote
M.Dancer Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 How many folks do you know or have heard of that walked from a failed breath test? two... Can't say that makes me happy Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
M.Dancer Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 How many folks do you know or have heard of that walked from a failed breath test? According to the police, the tests registered more than 80 milligrams of alcohol (0.08) in Jaffer's blood. BTW....it wasn't the judge that let Jaffer walk....it was the crown attorney. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
capricorn Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 I figured there was a Charter connection to some of the charges being dropped, as I mentioned in a previous post. A rookie Ontario Provincial Police officer failed to follow proper procedures during a strip search of Jaffer, 38, causing the Crown to conclude the case would be open to a Charter challenge, the Star has learned. While the OPP opposed Jaffer only being charged with careless driving, the Crown took a steadfast position, sources say. http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/777576--judge-gives-former-tory-mp-500-slap-on-wrist Quote "We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers
capricorn Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 By the way it isn't just the "Liberal" partisans you Cons so seem to like to blame for everything, it has everybody other than the "Conservative" partisans talking. If that's what it takes for the public to demand that Crown Attorneys and judges get tough with prosecuting serious offences, I have no complaint. Quote "We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers
scribblet Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 I guess people are forgetting about the accusations by John Tory re: the Liberal "catch and release" policy. The Liberals set the bar for plea bargaining LOL Interesting how the opposition is attempting to politisize the issue to the point of suggesting the the Liberal justice system is corrupted. Quote Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province
scribblet Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 Did anyone know that the judge was a long time time Conservative, appointed to the bench by none other than Jim Flaherty? Or that the Conservative MP for the riding worked for 20 years in the very Orangeville courthouse that Jaffer got his plea bargain? Also the prosecuter was recently the moderator of a debate on status of women's issues in Orangeville. Who is the minister of state for status of women again? Provincial judges are not picked by the gov't, their names are put forward by an independent committee, the gov't generally accepts them. Interesting to read the suggestions that people think the provincial court system is corrupt though. Quote Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province
eyeball Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 I guess I'm just glad this is going to further damage the possibility of Harper's Conservatives every getting a majority. Otherwise I could care less given that drugs should be legal and cars should be outfitted with breathalyzer ignition interlock systems. It's 2010 for crying out loud, I was expecting fully automated roads and cars with wet bars by now. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
robert_viera Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 (edited) Does anyone know a source to back up these claims? From Hansard for the Ontario Legislature for April 3, 1996: Let me go through some of the other appointments ... ... Douglas Maund, to the Orangeville Police Services Board, chief of staff to Perrin Beatty and political friend of your Minister of Health, who also worked for Perrin Beatty. Source: http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/house-proceedings/house_detail.do?Date=1996-04-03&Parl=36&Sess=1&locale=enPerrin Beatty, of course, was a cabinet minister in Brian Mulroney's Conservative government. The Minister of Health at the time of the above quote was Jim Wilson, who is the Conservative MPP in Helena Guergis' riding. Judge Maund was appointed to the court on October 4, 2000. Source: http://www.ontariocourts.on.ca/ocj/en/reports/annualreport/05.pdf Jim Flaherty was the Attorney General of Ontario in 2000. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Flaherty#Cabinet Edited March 10, 2010 by robert_viera Quote THE BROWN RETORT | Photos of householders and ten-percenters
M.Dancer Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 If that's what it takes for the public to demand that Crown Attorneys and judges get tough with prosecuting serious offences, I have no complaint. I agree. I have no sympathy for anyone who drives under the influence of drugs, booze or cold medicine. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Alta4ever Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 I guess I'm just glad this is going to further damage the possibility of Harper's Conservatives every getting a majority. Otherwise I could care less given that drugs should be legal and cars should be outfitted with breathalyzer ignition interlock systems. It's 2010 for crying out loud, I was expecting fully automated roads and cars with wet bars by now. So are you willing to pay extra for this I'M NOT. Zero tolerance pull the license punish them. But unfortunately our natural governing party wants to give everyone a slap on the wrist, and send them on their way. If we legalize drugs I want a system of underwriten health premiums those pricks who chose to do them can pay for there own damn healthcare not me. Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
DrGreenthumb Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 So are you willing to pay extra for this I'M NOT. Zero tolerance pull the license punish them. But unfortunately our natural governing party wants to give everyone a slap on the wrist, and send them on their way. If we legalize drugs I want a system of underwriten health premiums those pricks who chose to do them can pay for there own damn healthcare not me. And the same treatment for those who can be proven to have used alcohol, cigarettes, fatty foods etc? Quote
Alta4ever Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 And the same treatment for those who can be proven to have used alcohol, cigarettes, fatty foods etc? yep Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
DrGreenthumb Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 yep So what you are really saying is that you oppose a publicly funded Health care system? Or is it that you prefer using a publicly funded health care system to limit people's lifestyle choices? Health enforcement officers anyone? Sorry I think we can keep our Health care system without sacrificing our freedoms. Just curious should we also make it customer pay for athletes who get hurt playing violent sports like hockey? Mountain climbers? for children who play in soccer leaugues? School sports like basketball? My daughter broke 2 fingers last month playing basketball. Statisticly I'll bet competeing in sports is more likely to cost our health system money than being a pot smoker does. Quote
Alta4ever Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 So what you are really saying is that you oppose a publicly funded Health care system? Or is it that you prefer using a publicly funded health care system to limit people's lifestyle choices? Health enforcement officers anyone? Sorry I think we can keep our Health care system without sacrificing our freedoms. Just curious should we also make it customer pay for athletes who get hurt playing violent sports like hockey? Mountain climbers? for children who play in soccer leaugues? School sports like basketball? My daughter broke 2 fingers last month playing basketball. Statisticly I'll bet competeing in sports is more likely to cost our health system money than being a pot smoker does. I prefer freedoms coupled with responsibility. You seem to want the freedom but none of the responsibility that comes with it. Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
DrGreenthumb Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 I prefer freedoms coupled with responsibility. You seem to want the freedom but none of the responsibility that comes with it. Oh really and what would cause you to come to that conclusion? Also you didn't answer the questions. Should sports injuries also be not covered by our system? Quote
eyeball Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 If we legalize drugs I want a system of underwriten health premiums those pricks who chose to do them can pay for there own damn healthcare not me. I agree. As for automating our roads, we should have started down that path on general safety principles alone years ago. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
Alta4ever Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 Oh really and what would cause you to come to that conclusion? Your posts. Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
madmax Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 Conservatives are tough on Drug Users. Quote
madmax Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 No Conservatives are tough on crime. Seriously, they are TOUGH. Tough on crime I tell you. Its jail. If it was some back alley user, they'd make certain that criminal was locked up good. Tough. :angry: Quote
Wilber Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 (edited) I guess I'm just glad this is going to further damage the possibility of Harper's Conservatives every getting a majority. Otherwise I could care less given that drugs should be legal and cars should be outfitted with breathalyzer ignition interlock systems. It's 2010 for crying out loud, I was expecting fully automated roads and cars with wet bars by now. It's 2010 for crying out loud, personal responsibility is so passé Edited March 10, 2010 by Wilber Quote "Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC
madmax Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 I guess people are forgetting about the accusations by John Tory re: the Liberal "catch and release" policy. The Liberals set the bar for plea bargaining LOL Interesting how the opposition is attempting to politisize the issue to the point of suggesting the the Liberal justice system is corrupted. You'll say anything to coddle your own and stick it to others. Quote
eyeball Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 Not necessarily. What it could do is further rile the public into wanting stiffer minimum sentences and punishments for certain offences. That could play right into the Conservatives' hand of tougher law and order initiatives. Rational individuals can separate and differentiate between Guergis' airport escapade from her husband's encounter with the law. You're thoughts on the ability of people to rationally discern the differences and nuances between things like escapades, crimes and the appearance of two tiered justice systems is at odds with your hope that people will just as irrationally allow a galvanizing event like this to push them into accepting an ever harsher and more vindictive justice system. If that's what it takes for the public to demand that Crown Attorneys and judges get tough with prosecuting serious offences, I have no complaint. You should, this is a terrible way to govern a country where public policy is formulated on the basis of public reaction to crisis and outrage. There is nothing remotely rational about this. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.