Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I say it's about damn time. Apparently widespread voter fraud wasn't enough. But when coupled with pimping and prostitution, it was the last straw. Remember folks, this is where Obama started his career! And we all know that the acorns don't fall far from the trees! :lol:

U.S. Senate denies funds for poverty group

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A poverty-rights group that has drawn the ire of conservatives suffered another setback in Washington on Monday when the U.S. Senate voted overwhelmingly to deny it access to federal housing funds.

The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, which helps poor people fight foreclosures and fix tax problems, has received more than $53 million in U.S. funds since 1994, but conservatives' charges of widespread fraud have begun to impact its reputation in the capital.

Last week, the U.S. Census Bureau told the group it did not want its help boosting participation in next year's census.

The Senate measure, which passed 83 to 7 in the Democratic-led chamber, was included in a must-pass spending bill that funds housing and transportation programs for the fiscal year that starts October 1.

The group has also suffered an embezzlement scandal involving the founder's brother.

ACORN more recently has been embarrassed by conservative activists who secretly taped employees in several cities giving tax advice to a couple posing as a pimp and prostitute.

AP

Posted

You know Shady, when the best they can come up with is to change the subject or not address the topic, you are doing pretty good.

When will the MSM finally start covering this issue? Apparently sometime after they stop covering for Obama.

Posted

Maybe it didn't get widespread play in the MSM because nobody cares that some person who works for some obscure organization Obama worked for years ago was set up by obsessive Obama-hating right-wingers.

Except for obsessive Obama-hating right-wingers, of course.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted

Another tactic used, Shady, is to character assassinate so that the result appears tainted to those who believe everything they read. The result must be ignored or rejected at all costs. Stay tuned to see what other underhanded tactics may be used instead of wrestling with the idea that Acorn is dirty and they should have their funding cut.

Posted
What's Acorn?

Thanks, part of me was to timid to ask, the rest doesn't really care...

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
Maybe it didn't get widespread play in the MSM because nobody cares that some person who works for some obscure organization Obama worked for years ago was set up by obsessive Obama-hating right-wingers.

Actually, Bubbler, on looking into it further, Obama didn't work for Acorn.

Now one just has to wonder why these right-wingers are so obsessed that FoxNews has had it as its lead story for two weeks when all they are is a small, obscure organization that is meant to help black inner-city folks.

And they think the rest of the world (and the MSM) should be crazy and obsessed like them? :lol:

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted

ACORN is not a small obscure organization, it's huge receiving millions in federal funding.

Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province

Posted

They are not notorious because they receive money from the federal government. They are notorious because they are the current lightning rod for Republicans to push their "us versus them," divide-and-conquer approach to politics. They effectively represent the "dark other," an image that is easily transposed onto Obama.

Fortunately, that approach is largely failing. Even as Obama's approvals sink, Republican approvals aren't going up.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted
They are not notorious because they receive money from the federal government. They are notorious because they are the current lightning rod for Republicans to push their "us versus them," divide-and-conquer approach to politics. They effectively represent the "dark other," an image that is easily transposed onto Obama.

Fortunately, that approach is largely failing. Even as Obama's approvals sink, Republican approvals aren't going up.

So you condone their methodes as shown in the news videos?

"What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada

“The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

President Ronald Reagan

Posted
So you condone their methodes as shown in the news videos?

Nope. But it seems strange to be obsessed with them when people like Lehman Bros have ripped off taxpayers and investors for billions and billions and are continuing to rake in even more.

Strange priorities.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted

I suggest that if anyone is sick of hearing about the apparent corruption of ACORN then they should stick exclusively to the New York Times and MSNBC.It won't be mentioned at all. :lol:

Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...

Posted
Nope. But it seems strange to be obsessed with them when people like Lehman Bros have ripped off taxpayers and investors for billions and billions and are continuing to rake in even more.

Strange priorities.

Not so strange when you realize that financial institutions that have hundreds of billions in assets will tend to make billions. That's what corporations do in a functioning economy. Ripping off taxpayers? Are you referring to bonuses?

You may also note that those same people who are focusing on Acorn instead of Lehman etc, are focused on the $780 billion and the administration that wants to spend billions more as well as start up a federal medicare program in the middle of the worst economic crisis since the depression.

Posted
Not so strange when you realize that financial institutions that have hundreds of billions in assets will tend to make billions. That's what corporations do in a functioning economy. Ripping off taxpayers? Are you referring to bonuses?

You may also note that those same people who are focusing on Acorn instead of Lehman etc, are focused on the $780 billion and the administration that wants to spend billions more as well as start up a federal medicare program in the middle of the worst economic crisis since the depression.

Not only that, but referring to Lehman Bros to make his point is idiotic. They weren't rescued at all, and went bankrupt. :rolleyes:

Posted
They weren't rescued at all, and went bankrupt. :rolleyes:

Who's talking about bail-outs? I'm talking about manufactured bubbles.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted
Nope. But it seems strange to be obsessed with them when people like Lehman Bros have ripped off taxpayers and investors for billions and billions and are continuing to rake in even more.

Strange priorities.

But Lehman Bros isn't raking in even more. They went bankrupt. You're either lying or misinformed.

Posted
You're either lying or misinformed.

Neither. I'm mistaken. I meant to say Goldman Sachs.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
  • 2 months later...
Posted

You know Shady, when the best they can come up with is to change the subject or not address the topic, you are doing pretty good.

When will the MSM finally start covering this issue? Apparently sometime after they stop covering for Obama.

MSM never stopped covering for Carter but MSM support did him little good. I sincerely think Obama's on the same path.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted

I sincerely think Obama's on the same path.

Yeah, but you thought he was on the same path as Mondale and McGovern. :lol:

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted

Yeah, but you thought he was on the same path as Mondale and McGovern. :lol:

I never claimed to bat 1000.

I was initially hoping he'd do well. I never root against my country. I'm beginning to lose hope in him.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted (edited)

I was initially hoping he'd do well. I never root against my country. I'm beginning to lose hope in him.

You can't lose something you never had. I know you don't want your country to fail; you just want him to fail.

Edited by BubberMiley
"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted

You can't lose something you never had. I know you don't want your country to fail; you just want him to fail.

Absolutely not. I love my country too much to ever want any President to fail.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,022
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Smith29
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...