bush_cheney2004 Posted June 10, 2009 Author Report Posted June 10, 2009 This doesn't surprise me, because I believe he isn't the one calling the shots. Remember when he and Hillary missed the plane and the plane had all the reporters on it during his campaign? He had a meeting with the people from Bilderberg Group and it was this first meeting but not for Hillary. I know most of you don't or won't believe this and thats find but keep the toaster in the cupboard, along with the tinfoil! Thank you for saving Dancer the trouble! Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
GostHacked Posted June 10, 2009 Report Posted June 10, 2009 Surprised that Obama's actions support the Bush legacy? I am surprised because of Obama's Team Change campaign. Of course, in some ways he's way different, as is his approach to spending money. And Bush was no slouch in that department. No, I am surprised that people think change (for better) will actually come from Obama. I stated here on this board that he will be worse than Bush, but in different ways. So when change does not come around it is not surprising that people are taken by surprise. I knew he was going to continue Bush's policies. And to tell you the truth, I really though McCain was going to be Pres. Policy is carried out and on from Administration to Administration. When the announcement came for the closing of GITMO, I laughed because I knew it would never happen. And it is not because of Bush or Obama. The joke is on everyone who believed that Obama really stood for change. Quote
sharkman Posted June 10, 2009 Report Posted June 10, 2009 So that means that Obama lied, and people died! He has misled millions, and they are still eating the refuse shoveled at them because the MSM says that it's all true. Take the latest knee slapper from the administration, that they have saved 600,000 jobs. At the press conference the MSM did not immediately doubt the press secretary as they would have with Bush, but only wanted some general clarification so they could copy it all down and sound like they knew what they were talking about. No one said, hey, how does the 1,600,000 jobs lost figure into all of this? That would be a good question, but now the media is self-censoring their product to be friendly to the messiah. It won't matter in 6 months when even the dullest knives in the drawer realize that the economy hasn't been fixed, and unemployment numbers have worsened, not improved. Quote
GostHacked Posted June 10, 2009 Report Posted June 10, 2009 So that means that Obama lied, and people died! He has misled millions, and they are still eating the refuse shoveled at them because the MSM says that it's all true. Take the latest knee slapper from the administration, that they have saved 600,000 jobs. At the press conference the MSM did not immediately doubt the press secretary as they would have with Bush, but only wanted some general clarification so they could copy it all down and sound like they knew what they were talking about. No one said, hey, how does the 1,600,000 jobs lost figure into all of this? That would be a good question, but now the media is self-censoring their product to be friendly to the messiah. It won't matter in 6 months when even the dullest knives in the drawer realize that the economy hasn't been fixed, and unemployment numbers have worsened, not improved. *facepalm* FFS people. You sure as hell did not bitch about Bush's policies, but now that Obama has taken over and ran with the same policies and even ramped it up (something you would have supported under Bush), it now begs the question: Where the hell was your outrage when Bush was in office? Quote
sharkman Posted June 10, 2009 Report Posted June 10, 2009 (edited) Uh, you are going to have to be more specific about what I should have been outraged over with the Bush Admin. I have been wholeheartedly supportive of Bush and his policies, save for his big spending ways. I find it funny that Obama supporters now seem to have shut up about Iraq, and support Afghanistan. Obama's spending ways are outrageous, and therefore what do you suppose I think of them? I don't know if I've said much about propping up the car industry, but that is something Bush never had the opportunity to ponder. What Obama is doing there is outrageous as well. His nominations to various court levels are quite liberal, his support of abortion is decidedly different than Bush, and his approach to Israel, Europe, China, North Korea, Iran and the UN is decidedly different than Bush's approach. My line, Obama lied and people died, was actually in jest. He is a far different animal than Bush save for Iraq, Afghanistan, perhaps Gitmo(will it ever close?) and a few other areas. At any rate, a main point of my post is the MSM's hypocritical ways. What does FFS people stand for? Edited June 10, 2009 by sharkman Quote
Oleg Bach Posted June 10, 2009 Report Posted June 10, 2009 So you were supportive of his policy but not of his spending..wonder what the bill for Iraq is now? I wonder who is turning a profit on arms and general war supplies now? I wonder if his policy consisted of keep the rich rich even if you have to kill the poor...by duping them - same old - same old. American presidents are all about maintaining the status quo even if they do not deserve the maintenance...bail outs and bombs...When dumb terd is in office - he always reaches for the old play book - TITLED - WHEN YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO RUN AN EMPIRE - STIMULATE THE ECONOMY WITH WAR.....apparently the playbook was out of date. Quote
Shady Posted June 16, 2009 Report Posted June 16, 2009 Here's even more support of the Bush legacy by the Obama Administration. Obama blocks list of visitors to White House Taking Bush's position, administration denies msnbc.com request for logs The Obama administration is fighting to block access to names of visitors to the White House, taking up the Bush administration argument that a president doesn't have to reveal who comes calling to influence policy decisions. Despite President Barack Obama's pledge to introduce a new era of transparency to Washington, and despite two rulings by a federal judge that the records are public, the Secret Service has denied msnbc.com's request for the names of all White House visitors from Jan. 20 to the present. MSNBC Hope n change! I've noticed that several former Obama supporters rarely post in the United States politics forum anymore. And I'm assuming that the last several months have been pretty disheartening, and it's probably very difficult for them to muster the energy to defend him anymore. Quote
KrustyKidd Posted June 17, 2009 Report Posted June 17, 2009 Here's even more support of the Bush legacy by the Obama Administration.Obama blocks list of visitors to White House Taking Bush's position, administration denies msnbc.com request for logs The Obama administration is fighting to block access to names of visitors to the White House, taking up the Bush administration argument that a president doesn't have to reveal who comes calling to influence policy decisions. Despite President Barack Obama's pledge to introduce a new era of transparency to Washington, and despite two rulings by a federal judge that the records are public, the Secret Service has denied msnbc.com's request for the names of all White House visitors from Jan. 20 to the present. MSNBC Hope n change! I've noticed that several former Obama supporters rarely post in the United States politics forum anymore. And I'm assuming that the last several months have been pretty disheartening, and it's probably very difficult for them to muster the energy to defend him anymore. You know, I like Obama and the way he keeps Bush policies but does it with finesse and explanation. What I hate is his inexperience and uppity assumptions that Bush was wrong on everything and has to change everything only to discover that he can't for very valid reasons. I'm not going to go on with how much of an idiot he is as he certainly is smart enough to not just do what he promised but, to just go out and say he is going to do something and then later recant is the sign of somebody that just has no understanding of the office he is in. Wise up Obama! Golly. You know, it's been over a hundred thirty days and he hasn't done one original thing? Everything he has done Bush was going to do except only when the time was right? As Obama realizes as he has scaled down his time frames on Gitmo and Iraq. Quote We're Paratroopers Lieutenant. We're supposed to be surrounded - CPT Richard Winters
Smallc Posted June 17, 2009 Report Posted June 17, 2009 I don't think that Obama assumes that Bush was wrong on everything....many things, but not everything. Quote
enlightment Posted July 6, 2009 Report Posted July 6, 2009 I don't think that Obama assumes that Bush was wrong on everything....many things, but not everything. The best way to know U.S. politics is to view " Obama Deception Full Length " on youtube.com Also download the free Obama Deception Guide : http://www.scribd.com/doc/13404412/The-Obama-Deception-Guide There is no Left or Right in US politics , they are only acting in front of the camera. When off camera, the Left and the Right go to parties and dinner...etc. The only people controlling the White House is the International Bankers and the US Presidency is only a puppet post. For the explanation of all these wars in the past 100 years, please check out the link below and then read all the links of that site. One thing for sure, we have been sidetracked to petty issues while something deadly serious, threatening to Mankind is being secretly engineered. http://nworesistance.com/war-and-conflict-explained.html Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.