iForgot Posted February 20, 2008 Report Posted February 20, 2008 (edited) What % of non-whites are assimilated into Canadian culture? Edited February 22, 2008 by iForgot Quote
iForgot Posted February 22, 2008 Author Report Posted February 22, 2008 I said 10-25 percent, of which they are always 2nd or 3rd generation and tend to be Asians or Gujarati/Ismaeli Indians. Quote
margrace Posted February 22, 2008 Report Posted February 22, 2008 I said 10-25 percent, of which they are always 2nd or 3rd generation and tend to be Asians or Gujarati/Ismaeli Indians. Interesting aside from the Asian view. One in 200 people is estimated to be descendant from Ghengi Khan, or roughtly the population of Canada. Quote
Leafless Posted February 23, 2008 Report Posted February 23, 2008 What % of non-whites are assimilated into Canadian culture? In this country, does it really matter???? Quote
iForgot Posted February 24, 2008 Author Report Posted February 24, 2008 In this country, does it really matter???? Because of official multiculturalism? Leafless, can I ask exactly what you want in terms of different races/cultures in Canada and if you were Prime Minister, what would you do? You're too difficult to figure out! Quote
Leafless Posted February 24, 2008 Report Posted February 24, 2008 Because of official multiculturalism?Leafless, can I ask exactly what you want in terms of different races/cultures in Canada and if you were Prime Minister, what would you do? You're too difficult to figure out! I am to difficult to figure out and you don't question the antics of the feds undemocratic, discriminatory 'Charter of rights and Freedoms'. I don't believe in official multiculturalism for the simple reason it requires the intervention of state control which leads to oppression and discrimination of other groups. IOW- The more equality the more government control....absolute equality means absolute government control. Briefly if I were prime minister everyone in Canada would be expected to be unconditionally Canadian first and be expected to conform to the majority culture and traditions of the land. There would be no 'Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the hands of the federal government and our original 'Bill of Rights would be reinstated and turned over to individual provinces to allow them full control relating to those specific rights. The addition of rights would be allowed but only utilizing a democratic process such as a referendum with a basic predetermined percentage. The undemocratic selling out the country to the counter productive political whims of minorities constitutes traitorism in my book. Quote
jbg Posted February 24, 2008 Report Posted February 24, 2008 I believe that but for official multiculturalism there would be strong. Immigrants would have overwhelming incentives to learn English, seek employment in the mainstream economy and merge in. This has been the pattern in the US, and still is, even for Hispanic people, where they live in areas where they are not a majority. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
iForgot Posted February 24, 2008 Author Report Posted February 24, 2008 (edited) I am to difficult to figure out and you don't question the antics of the feds undemocratic, discriminatory 'Charter of rights and Freedoms'. I don't believe in official multiculturalism for the simple reason it requires the intervention of state control which leads to oppression and discrimination of other groups. IOW- The more equality the more government control....absolute equality means absolute government control. Briefly if I were prime minister everyone in Canada would be expected to be unconditionally Canadian first and be expected to conform to the majority culture and traditions of the land. There would be no 'Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the hands of the federal government and our original 'Bill of Rights would be reinstated and turned over to individual provinces to allow them full control relating to those specific rights. The addition of rights would be allowed but only utilizing a democratic process such as a referendum with a basic predetermined percentage. The undemocratic selling out the country to the counter productive political whims of minorities constitutes traitorism in my book. I agree. You said briefly when you were prime minister everyone must be apart of the majority culture, what would happen afterwards? Also what would you do about immigration?? Would any non-whites be deported? Edited February 24, 2008 by iForgot Quote
August1991 Posted February 24, 2008 Report Posted February 24, 2008 (edited) I don't believe in official multiculturalism for the simple reason it requires the intervention of state control which leads to oppression and discrimination of other groups. IOW- The more equality the more government control....absolute equality means absolute government control. Briefly if I were prime minister everyone in Canada would be expected to be unconditionally Canadian first and be expected to conform to the majority culture and traditions of the land. In an absurdly ignorant thread, you've managed Leafless to insert somehow an even more incoherent comment.I'll leave aside your misunderstanding of multiculturalism and the Charter of Rights (and I'm no fan of either BTW). I'll even leave aside the a definition of "majority culture". (The single largest religious group in Canada is Roman Catholic - do you suggest everyone else to convert?) Instead, I'll merely note that in one sentence you oppose "absolute government control" and in the next sentence you state that as PM, you would expect everyone "to conform". WTF? Leafless, you've posted some remarkably dumb comments in your time but this one deserves a special place in the pantheon of stupidity. Edited February 24, 2008 by August1991 Quote
jbg Posted February 24, 2008 Report Posted February 24, 2008 In an absurdly ignorant thread, you've managed Leafless to insert somehow an even more incoherent comment.What I think he's trying to say is that preservation of alien cultures in a new land comes only with state intervention, either forced segregation or financial incentives for the newcomers to remain separate. That being said, Leafless is quite capable of doing what you say. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
OneNoShine Posted February 26, 2008 Report Posted February 26, 2008 (edited) ??? EDIT: This post used to be an opening post of a thread entitled: Do you think Canada should try to maintain an 80% white majority? and has now been merged into this previous thread. Edited March 4, 2008 by Charles Anthony merged thread Quote
guyser Posted February 26, 2008 Report Posted February 26, 2008 ??? Go ahead tell us if it should and why? Quote
DogOnPorch Posted February 26, 2008 Report Posted February 26, 2008 Don't you just love new members? Such subtle questions. Is this your brick? Found it on the floor next to the shattered glass. ------------------------------------ Though there's grining and mandolining in sunny Italy The beginning has just begun when the sun goes down So please meet me in the plaza near your casa I am only one and one is much too few On an evening in Roma ---Dean Martin Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
BC_chick Posted February 27, 2008 Report Posted February 27, 2008 Is "white" a culture or a skin-pigmentation? Not sure because I wouldn't know where to categorise the patois-speaking white Jamaican. How about the dark-skinned Sicilian? Or the light-skinned, blue-eyed East Indian? If it's all about pigmentation, would you prefer immigrants who are poor Europeans over the educated Africans? If it's about culture, what's the qualifier? Religion? Promixity to Europe? What if the immigrant is third-generation visible-minority Brit who plays cricket and drinks tea? Is that enough as "culture"? First define "white"... then you can pose the question. Quote It's kind of the worst thing that any humans could be doing at this time in human history. Other than that, it's fine." Bill Nye on Alberta Oil Sands
OneNoShine Posted February 27, 2008 Report Posted February 27, 2008 Both parents are European. That's what Leafless wants, he tip toes around it and says "White English Culture" what he really means is he wants no non-whites in Canada even as a minority/assimilated. He's just covering it up with words just like the BNP. Quote
Borg Posted February 27, 2008 Report Posted February 27, 2008 (edited) Well, lets see. If kebec can advocate only those who speak french will be citizens then why not? If a korean can kick whites out of a strip mall due to their skin colour and language ability then why not? And the beat goes on. The real answer is no. Why? Because to be racist in this country you have to be white. And we cannot have a racist white - can we? After all the vast majority of human rights commission decisions have told us this is so. Now, where did I put that other brick. Borg Edited February 27, 2008 by Borg Quote
xul Posted February 27, 2008 Report Posted February 27, 2008 (edited) ??? Lets presume BNPs have taken over Canada and adopted the policy of that maintains an 80% white majorityand 20% minority, no offend to Canadian, just a presumption for discussing the topic. And now Canda have 80% white and 20% others, then BNPs build a Great Wall like China mediaeval emperors enclosured all Canada border let no one can enter or go out to keep this ratio, so everything seems OK--from some guys view point. But tomorrow, if there are some white "liberal girls" in 80% white population might not will to breed children but the 20% others might, many years later, the population of white would less then 80% and the others would be over 20%. So the BNP government had to do something to pull the ratio back to its initial position, they might be: 1. set up gas chambers and murder all "surplus" minorities; 2. hire outlaw Nazi doctors to turn some minorities to white; 3. kidnap millions of pure blood Britishes, Frenches, Germans, Spanishes, Russians, albino Africans and Asians....to make up the shortage of wihte guys; 4. throw all "liberal girls" into the dungeon of BNP's gods' temple, let a BNP clergy spank them to lecture them how to breed 12 children; 5. dispel some minority Canadian, give them a boat and throw them into Pacific Ocean. If any of them does not want to leave for having seasickness or something, police will shoot them; 6. .... If anyone thought this kind of "Canada" is good, just join BNP or CNP something and help it to take over Canada.... Edited February 27, 2008 by xul Quote
BC_chick Posted February 27, 2008 Report Posted February 27, 2008 and xul hits the nail on the head by pointing out the slippery slope that ended up with millions of people dead last time someone thought they were too pure to share their country. Good post. PS... your English has improved tremendously. I don't come by as often as I used to, but the last time I saw one of your posts was summertime-ish and all I can say is.... someone's been practicing. Quote It's kind of the worst thing that any humans could be doing at this time in human history. Other than that, it's fine." Bill Nye on Alberta Oil Sands
xul Posted February 27, 2008 Report Posted February 27, 2008 (edited) PS... your English has improved tremendously. I don't come by as often as I used to, but the last time I saw one of your posts was summertime-ish and all I can say is.... someone's been practicing. Thank you for encouraging me. It is not as good as it looks. I usually need the help of a dictionary to accomplish my post. But of couse, I also feel I have had some improvement. I think I mostly benefited from reading some books. One of the books is Harry Porter And The Sorcerer's Stone. There was a funny story of a magic mirror named Mirror of Erised in the book. It gave people a illusion of what they wanted, but neither knowledge nor truth. And, according the words of the book, "Men have wasted away before it, entranced by what they have seen, or been driven mad, not knowing if what it shows is real or even possible." Hope these may help all skin color fans. Edited February 27, 2008 by xul Quote
Borg Posted February 27, 2008 Report Posted February 27, 2008 Lets presume BNPs have taken over Canada and adopted the policy of that maintains an 80% white majorityand 20% minority, no offend to Canadian, just a presumption for discussing the topic. And now Canda have 80% white and 20% others, then BNPs build a Great Wall like China mediaeval emperors enclosured all Canada border let no one can enter or go out to keep this ratio, so everything seems OK--from some guys view point. But tomorrow, if there are some white "liberal girls" in 80% white population might not will to breed children but the 20% others might, many years later, the population of white would less then 80% and the others would be over 20%. So the BNP government had to do something to pull the ratio back to its initial position, they might be: 1. set up gas chambers and murder all "surplus" minorities; 2. hire outlaw Nazi doctors to turn some minorities to white; 3. kidnap millions of pure blood Britishes, Frenches, Germans, Spanishes, Russians, albino Africans and Asians....to make up the shortage of wihte guys; 4. throw all "liberal girls" into the dungeon of BNP's gods' temple, let a BNP clergy spank them to lecture them how to breed 12 children; 5. dispel some minority Canadian, give them a boat and throw them into Pacific Ocean. If any of them does not want to leave for having seasickness or something, police will shoot them; 6. .... If anyone thought this kind of "Canada" is good, just join BNP or CNP something and help it to take over Canada.... Never heard of BNP or CNP - but if an alien life form were to come down and take over canada ............... Good grief Borg Quote
AngusThermopyle Posted February 27, 2008 Report Posted February 27, 2008 let a BNP clergy spank them to lecture them how to breed 12 children; Can I be the spanking guy? I could show them how to get going on the breeding thing too. Quote I yam what I yam - Popeye
Leafless Posted February 27, 2008 Report Posted February 27, 2008 (edited) and xul hits the nail on the head by pointing out the slippery slope that ended up with millions of people dead last time someone thought they were too pure to share their country. You and xul are creating the slippery slope. You should know very well Canadians are kept under the 'socialist mushroom system' which is 'keep them in the dark and feed them horse manure'. Majority White Canadians currently have no control over the imposed socialistic immigration ideologies in Canada. This entire thread is nothing more than the invention of a troublesome troll. Edited February 27, 2008 by Leafless Quote
M.Dancer Posted February 27, 2008 Report Posted February 27, 2008 White Canadians currently have no control over the imposed socialistic immigration ideologies in Canada. Which must explain why Parliament is 90% white.... Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Leafless Posted February 27, 2008 Report Posted February 27, 2008 (edited) Which must explain why Parliament is 90% white.... Which closely is representative to Canada's 11.2% non-White population. http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/1998/02/17/ethnic980217b.html Edited February 28, 2008 by Leafless Quote
M.Dancer Posted February 27, 2008 Report Posted February 27, 2008 Which is closely is representative to Canada's 11.2% non-White population. http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/1998/02/17/ethnic980217b.html Then you agree then your statement is nothing more than hysterical hyperbole.... Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.