What % of non-whites are assimilated into Canadian culture?

[Leafless]

Would you agree that someone who threatens physical violence anonymously over the Internet is the definition of a coward?

IT wasn't a threat ....it was a question.

Why don't you post what was actually said, including your inflammatory language relating to that incident?????

You can include fruitcake guysers inflammatory language also.

If I remeber correctly it was I, who wondered where the moderators were.

[Leafless]

For him, Jews are "non-whites".

Technically this could be right.

Another allegation but NO proof I made such a statement.

I would also assume the general population has no idea if Jews are considered non-White.

[BubberMiley]

IT wasn't a threat ....it was a question.

I'm not certain what you're referring to. You'll have to be more specific. I was just asking a question relating to the topic. Wouldn't you agree that threatening acts of violence against minority populations or calling for their displacement from their natural or adopted home, but only doing so anonymously, is somewhat cowardly? Would you be willing to sign your real name to your positions?

[xul]

Uh yah I am. Lol. But I wa snot talking about this particular person. Just what fuels SOME bigoted people in general. I also classify myself as mentally ill. Not too worry though. I keep myself locked up in a padded place. And Leafless Americangal was responding to my generalities which are not directed at any one person.

My attitude on people who like to define people by stereotypes is to try explain why they feel the need to. I am the first to admit and concede behaviour theories are only that theories.

Now, I have fully understanded the intention of the post you posted though I still think it is better way to post the part of I quoted in an independent topic.

I have one for why I like Americanwoman. She would not burn a cross on my lawn and knows what the word putz means.

I like her too, both the wisdom and the manner to deal with the insultation from others. I also like Bush_Cheney_2004, both his wisdom and his army style frank and rudeness--especially when he tought others using the same way to treat the state he loved.

I also like people like leafless, they speak frankly what they though, though sometime they spoke unintentionally not exactly what they wanted, that made them looked bad than they actually are.

You gentiles can be o.k. You just need to stop using mayonaisse amduse mustard and more rye and darkbreads and stop with the butter and ham white bread sandwitches. That is disgusting. Its as bad as those hams with the hair nets.

I'm not a good cook, but I think even the best cook could not stew a pot of stone into delicious by adding some condiment into soup. If any bouillon has flavor, it mainly because it really have meat, not only added condiment.

Edited March 2, 2008 by xul

[Leafless]

I'm not certain what you're referring to. You'll have to be more specific. I was just asking a question relating to the topic. Wouldn't you agree that threatening acts of violence against minority populations or calling for their displacement from their natural or adopted home, but only doing so anonymously, is somewhat cowardly?

You will have to be more specific with the necessary details as no one can conclude that for instance the actions of a troublesome minority could be cause to suggest the action you suggest.

Would you be willing to sign your real name to your positions?

I don't think you are in the position to question anyone relating to issues of security. I have not seen you sign your name to any of your positions controversial or NOT. Obviously you would think it would be foolhardy to do so, so why should anyone else be so foolhardy to do so?

Anyone who would suggest to sign ones name on a controversial public Internet political forum I would say is indeed, himself or herself, unstable.

Individuals who do voice opinions do not have the resources government has to implement for instance, undesirable and discriminatory, traitorous policies with the end result being the same, as acts of violence against certain groups, but with no single person being accountable for those destructive policies.

[jbg]

Technically this could be right.

Another allegation but NO proof I made such a statement.

I would also assume the general population has no idea if Jews are considered non-White.

I don't remember which thread this was on, but you posted a whole raft of allegations that Jews don't assimilate, etc. It bordered on dislike of and emnity for Jews. I don't need to prove it because in Canada "a proof is a proof".

[BubberMiley]

Anyone who would suggest to sign ones name on a controversial public Internet political forum I would say is indeed, himself or herself, unstable.

Individuals who do voice opinions do not have the resources government has to implement for instance, undesirable and discriminatory, traitorous policies with the end result being the same, as acts of violence against certain groups, but with no single person being accountable for those destructive policies.

I wouldn't suggest that you or anyone sign your real name. That's obviously a matter of personal choice. But don't you think it's cowardly to not do so?

I wouldn't sign my name, primarily because I operate a business and "BubberMiley" admits to using illegal drugs in his daily routine. I would stand to lose money if my real identity were revealed. That, however, does not make me any less of a coward.

I'm also a pacifist, largely because I'm a coward.

And surely threatening violence to others in the confines of an anonymous forum is equally cowardly, don't you think?

[Leafless]

I also like Bush_Cheney_2004, both his wisdom and his army style frank and rudeness--especially when he tought others using the same way to treat the state he loved.

BC basis his wisdom on American aggression as a super power.

BC exploits the power of America for his own personal benefit.

[Leafless]

I don't remember which thread this was on, but you posted a whole raft of allegations that Jews don't assimilate, etc. It bordered on dislike of and emnity for Jews. I don't need to prove it because in Canada "a proof is a proof".

You made an allegation, one you cannot support, proves you are an instigator as well as a coward who must post lies for your own personal benefit.

Edited March 2, 2008 by Leafless

[BubberMiley]

BC exploits the power of America for his own personal benefit.

More power to him.

[Leafless]

I wouldn't suggest that you or anyone sign your real name. That's obviously a matter of personal choice. But don't you think it's cowardly to not do so?

The only thing I think is that BubberMiley not only being a troll is a cheap instigator and rabble-rouser with his main goal of trying to suppress free speech.

And surely threatening violence to others in the confines of an anonymous forum is equally cowardly, don't you think?

Certainly not. Posters are free to post whatever they wish. This is called free speech.

But in saying this, this forum has rules against posting the type of content you are talking about and similar. Posting the type of content you are talking about, especially for NO REASON, would result in a ban.

Edited March 2, 2008 by Leafless

[Leafless]

More power to him.

I thought you were a pacifist and a coward?

Your own words:

I'm also a pacifist, largely because I'm a coward.

[BubberMiley]

But in saying this, this forum has rules against posting the type of content you are talking about and similar. Posting the type of content you are talking about, especially for NO REASON, would result in a ban.

I'm glad you've seen the light. Perhaps you could now man up and apologize to American Woman for telling her to go to hell.

[guyser]

I'm glad you've seen the light. Perhaps you could now man up and apologize to American Woman for telling her to go to hell.

...and me too. You called me a fruitcake and I loathe fruitcakes. Unless I am re-gifting them. I do like dark chocolate cake .

LLess, You are trying to stifle my right to free speech.

[Leafless]

I'm glad you've seen the light.

Your glad I seen the light from BM who insults and instigates on a regular basis.

LOL,LOL,LOL!!!!!

Perhaps you could now man up and apologize to American Woman for telling her to go to hell.

I suggest the two of you go and jump in the lake.

BTW, you are wasting broadband with your little senseless, insignificant messages.

Why don't you join a female chat group somewhere out in there cyberspace, where I am sure you would feel a lot more comfortable.

[BubberMiley]

Your glad I seen the light from BM who insults and instigates on a regular basis.

Please provide one instance where I've ever insulted anyone. Otherwise I'll chalk it up to another instance of you being incapable of completing a post without insulting.

[Melanie_]

Why don't you join a female chat group somewhere out in there cyberspace, where I am sure you would feel a lot more comfortable.

"Female chat group"? Leafless, your misogyny is showing!

[Leafless]

"Female chat group"? Leafless, your misogyny is showing!

Really.

I didn't realize Bubber was female.

[Melanie_]

Your "female chat group" comment is misogynist regardless of whether or not Bubber is female (I'm pretty sure Bubber is a guy, by the way). Or were you not trying to insult him by suggesting he would be more comfortable in a female group?

[jbg]

I thought you were a pacifist and a coward?

Your own words:

This is the kind of posting that makes me think about leaving the threads. This battle (not aiming at "Leafless" in particular) is inane.

[Leafless]

Your "female chat group" comment is misogynist regardless of whether or not Bubber is female (I'm pretty sure Bubber is a guy, by the way).

I only thought "misogynist" could only be applicable if Bubber was a female.

How else could you justify use of the word with no proof or quote that suggested I hate females?

Or are you simply trying to label Leafless with more typically liberal unfounded allegations?

Or were you not trying to insult him by suggesting he would be more comfortable in a female group?

Bubber was defending American Women despite after I reasonably had proven her allegations by way of insulting insinuations towards me were true.

IOW, Bubber fails to realize if women want to play politics and make false claims and then turn around and standing in their defense demands an apology, is ludicrous.

It is obvious Bubber has a bias against males and is that why I said he would probably feel more comfortable somewhere in cyberspace "in a female chat group".

In the world of politics a female politician or one that debates in forums like this one, deserves no more sympathy than a male.

Edited March 4, 2008 by Leafless

[BubberMiley]

It is obvious Bubber has a bias against males and is that why I said he would probably feel more comfortable somewhere in cyberspace "in a female chat group".

Thanks for giving me the best laugh I've had all day.

Still waiting for you to back up your insult charge though.

[Melanie_]

I only thought "misogynist" could only be applicable if Bubber was a female.

How else could you justify use of the word with no proof or quote that suggested I hate females?

Or are you simply trying to label Leafless with more typically liberal unfounded allegations?

Bubber was defending American Women despite after I reasonably had proven her allegations by way of insulting insinuations towards me were true.

IOW, Bubber fails to realize if women want to play politics and make false claims and then turn around and standing in their defense demands an apology, is ludicrous.

It is obvious Bubber has a bias against males and is that why I said he would probably feel more comfortable somewhere in cyberspace "in a female chat group".

In the world of politics a female politician or one that debates in forums like this one, deserves no more sympathy than a male.

You thought wrong.

Sheesh, for someone who claims to love the English language so much, you certainly have a poor grasp of it. I'll try to explain this really clearly, with short sentences, because apparently you need even the simplest concepts spelled out for you.

You wanted to insult Bubber. You told him to go join a female chat group. Using that as an insult implies that you have a lesser opinion of females than males. It implies a negative connection to men participating in "female chat groups". It implies that this forum is for men. It is a misogynistic comment.

You brought gender into this, and are making a strawman out of it. Gender had nothing to do with your argument with Bubber or AW, but the post I'm quoting from makes it really clear that you somehow see gender as being part of this. Again, your misogyny is showing!

[Argus]

What I wonder is - which idiot voted "more than 90%" and where does he live? PEI?

[Leafless]

You thought wrong.

Sheesh, for someone who claims to love the English language so much, you certainly have a poor grasp of it. I'll try to explain this really clearly, with short sentences, because apparently you need even the simplest concepts spelled out for you.

You wanted to insult Bubber.

This is where you are totally disconnected from reality, in typical liberal fashion

You wanted to insult Bubber

making false allegations and insults,

Sheesh, for someone who claims to love the English language so much, you certainly have a poor grasp of it. I'll try to explain this really clearly, with short sentences, because apparently you need even the simplest concepts spelled out for you.

Prove that I intentionally wanted to insult Bubber, commie lady?

If you can't, at least have the common courtesy to apologize for your error in judgement.

I sincerely assumed, he would rather enjoy the company of women in a female chat group.

Simple isn't it!