-1=e^ipi

You are right. I spoiled my ballot. Glad I made the right decision.

Yet the last 3 PM spouses managed to avoid the spotlight. Sophie wants to be in the spotlight.

Yeah and usually they earn it. Like applying to a job, getting it due to qualifications (well I guess sometimes due to race/sex quotas) and then they work to keep their jobs (well actually a lot of civil servants are lazy, but whatever). Marrying someone isn't merit. If I marry someone who is currently employed by statistics Canada, does that mean I should now be employed by statistics Canada, or require that statistics Canada hire 2 state funded nannies for me?

Because they aren't elected. If Sophie Trudeau were an MP or were an CEO or something, then by all means be in the public spotlight. Or maybe I should put it this way: I think the spouse of the pm should be as visible as they would be if their spouse were not the pm.

The spouses of the last 3 pms were pretty much invisible, as it should be.

Sure taxpapers will. It's the royal family of Canada! It is a far better use a taxpayer money than helping the people that lost their homes in Fort McMurray. It's not like Sophie isn't married to a millionaire who was born into wealth and has a massive income that can hire a bunch of assistance using his own money. Besides, Sophie is probably just super stressed from going on 3 vacations so far this year (Nevis, Whistler and fogo island). I mean can you imagine going on so many vacations to so many exotic places so frequently while creating a giant CO2 footprint due to flying? I certainly can't.

I disagree. The only thing that being a spouse should let you do is live with your spouse. She wasn't elected, no one voted for Sophie Trudeau. Maybe she should get a job, a real one. It's 2016! Women are clearly incapable beings that need a chivalrous knight in shiny social justice armor like Trudeau to come save them from things such as working for a living.

How dare you question our princess! She is super oppressed with her giant palace, 2 state funded nannies to look after her kids, and her own personal assistant. That clearly isn't enough! How else is she to reach maximum personal fulfillment? She clearly needs an entire team to cater to her every whim. All the men and women out there who worked fulltime while raising multiple kids without state funded nannies and personal assistants simply cannot comprehend the hardship that Sophie Trudeau faces. This is also the reason why Sophie Trudeau insists that her giant palace is lit with incandescent light bulbs while us mere peons must use compact flourescents or LEDs in order to save the planet and keep our electricity bills affordable. The spectrum of incandescent light bulbs is simply more natural and we can't afford to harm Sophie's delicate eyes with such unnatural non-incandescent light bulb light.

I never claimed that UK, US or Canada are failed states. Strawman argument. Though, Canada is starting to look like it is heading towards one to be honest.

They might go with P3, just to maintain the illusion of a fair system.

New Zealand is a failed state?

Pretty sure Mulcair wanted a referendum too.

Not without foreign help, I agree.

Because it's free help that can help put out the fires sooner and reduce property damage. Lot's of things aren't necessary, should we just get rid of everything that isn't necessary? Movie theatres aren't necessary, so I guess ban movie theatres?

As far as I am aware, the 'experts' merely proclaimed that foreign help isn't necessary. Do you think that necessary and desirable are the same thing?

As for the people proclaiming that experts are telling us not to accept foreign help (which they aren't), even if they were, experts also thought Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Experts said we should fund islamists in Syria. Experts are often wrong.

I suggest you use the term adult baby. It is more politically correct.

There is a difference between necessity and desirability. Saying that domestic resources are sufficient does not mean that foreign resources are not helpful.

He's going to wait for all this fighting in the South to play itself out. In the meantime, he's going to try to take control of the North, the Vale and the Riverlands. The iron throne, and perhaps control of the stormlands.

Pretty dumb rule, given that the most qualified women are primarily alive. For example: http://www.science.ca/scientists/scientistprofile.php?pID=419 Oh well, what do you expect from a government that rejects enlightenment values like equality between men, women and non-binary people?

The Queen aint dead yet.

Ned purposely changed the wording. You really think they would put so much emphasis on Ned changing the wording in season 1 without reason?

Probably manipulating Gendry, the true king of Westeros. Also, probably traveling North to the Erie and then to see Sansa. Wrong. Gendry was legitimized in season 1 by Robert Baratheon on his death bed.

New favourite rapper: