B. Max

No because that would be the end of China's economy and a return of a complete economy to the US.

Another in the long list of papers that prove Gore and the IPCC are liars. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard...ratures-cooling

But in the end they are going to get it.

Go ahead and do it. Not one can prove man made global warming as we have been told to believe. It is a fraud and it has been proven to be a fraud over and over again.

This is nothing new. To much sun has always been bad for you.

The NDP in Ont. are trying to get the Ont. government to make everyone a donor by reverse onus. Their argument is that at the time of an accident they often can't find the donor card in time to see what it says. What if they take someones organs and after they find the card and it says no. To presume that everyone is a consenting donor sounds like a modern day version of the body snatchers.

He'll have to get in line with a hundred thousand others who would like a piece of Flaherty.

Well they haven't been doing to good of a job at it. One party member on another board said he was contacted by the party, and they were looking for a donation. They started off by saying it's been a long time since you gave anything to the conservative party. He replied, it's been a long time since they did anything conservative.

Yeah that was probably about the last time they one it. Ont. has been goen down hill ever since.

name='geoffrey' date='Aug 4 2007, 04:50 AM' post='241889'] No I'm not aguing for that at all. The government already operates a no fault system that covers personal injury, and used to cover property but they dropped it. Good drivers are being punished right now, and are footing the bill. I don't know if everyones risk is equal or not, but everyones contribution certainly is not.

Funny you should mention it at this time. http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/stor...06?hub=Politics

That is ridiculous. Those who crack the whip for Caliphate have no intention of getting along with anyone. Their goal is Islamic conguest of the whole world, and if you don't like it, it's off with your head.

Not that we didn't already know. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2...4929.shtml?s=lh Global Warming: Pure Fiction Gerlich, a professor of mathematical physics at the Technical University Carolo-Wilhelmina in Germany and his colleague professor, Ralf D. Tscheuschner, examined the so-called "greenhouse effect" and found it to be pure fiction as an instrument of alleged global warming. In 113 pages laden with complicated equations, citations from the scientific literature, examinations of various experiments and conclusions based on physics and the laws of physics, the researchers expose the fraudulent grounds upon which the global warming theory rests.

I don't remember anything about them, and probably the case for most people.

Harper is more like a captain Blackbeard.

name='geoffrey' date='Aug 3 2007, 07:37 PM' post='241842'] So is house insurance. But if your neighbours house catches fire and burns yours down at the same time and he doesn't have insurance do you care. No. When you bought your house insurance did they say that will be 700.00 just in case your house burns down your neighbours house and another 700.00 just in case your neighbours house burns yours down. No. If they did, you would tell them to shove it. Why should car insurance be any different. Do you not see the rip off here. So what, it doesn't replace my vehicle. That is a good point. We will assume you can afford to smash your vehicle up every day. Yes you can sue them, with no guarantee you'll ever see a cent. If the accident was my fault, my insurance would cover his vehicle. Other wise what good would it be. Even if he doesn't have insurance.

The facts always are.

name='geoffrey' date='Aug 3 2007, 02:28 AM' post='241735'] Well I can tell you from experience they don't. There are all kinds of people running around out there with no PL and PD. Because I should not have to pay twice, and many vehicles are not worth putting insurance on. That's the way the system is set up at this time, but it's not working. It's great if everyone has insurance, but they don't and it's getting worse. The system needs to be changed so that PL and PD covers yourself. If someone chooses not to have insurance that's their problem. It's a rip off right now that PL and PD covers essentially everyone in the entire province, yet won't cover one unless you pay twice. Even the guy out there running around with no insurance is covered but the guy footing the bill isn't. It's insane.

I don't have any speculation. The last time he shuffled the deck they managed to lose 6 or 7 points. It's not necessarily the deck, it's guy that's doing the shuffling.

Harper hints that the good ship red Tory has run aground, is likely a more accurate statement. Harper, in a case like this the captain resigns and doesn't try to blame it on the crew. http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/MediaNews/2007...4385378-cp.html

Of course. http://www.middleeastfacts.com/middle-east-facts.php Here is another for good information. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/myths/mftoc.html

Not meaningless, it's fact. You are on the side of Arab land thieves.

The fact is most of that is bull. These are the facts. 1. Nationhood and Jerusalem - Israel became a nation in 1312 B.C.E., two thousand years before the rise of Islam. 2. Arab refugees in Israel began identifying themselves as part of a Palestinian people in 1967, two decades after the establishment of the modern State of Israel. 3. Since the Jewish conquest in 1272 B.C.E. the Jews have had dominion over the land for one thousand years with a continuous presence in the land for the past 3,300 years. 4. Arabs have only had control of Israel twice - from 634 until the Crusader invasion in June 1099, and from 1292 until the year 1517 when they were dispelled by the Turks in their conquest. 5. For over 3,300 years, Jerusalem has been the Jewish capital. Jerusalem has never been the capital of any Arab or Muslim entity. Even when the Jordanians occupied Jerusalem, they never sought to make it their capital, and Arab leaders did not come to visit. 6. Jerusalem is mentioned over 700 times in Tanach, the Jewish Holy Scriptures. Jerusalem is not mentioned once in the Koran. There are vague references to Jerusalem in the Hadiths - stories about Mohammed - that he stopped his night journey (which the Koran explains took place in a dream!) at the "farther mosque" (or "distant place"). Muslims explain that this means "at the edge of the Temple mount", although no direct reference to Jerusalem or the Temple Mount is made. 7. King David established the city of Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Mohammed never came to Jerusalem. 8. Jews pray facing Jerusalem. Some Muslims (i.e. those between Israel and Saudi Arabia) pray with their backs toward Jerusalem. 9. Arab and Jewish Refugees - In 1948 the Arab refugees were encouraged to leave Israel by Arab leaders promising to purge the land of Jews. Sixty eight percent left without ever seeing an Israeli soldier. 10. The Jewish refugees were forced to flee from Arab lands due to Arab brutality, persecution and pogroms. 11. The number of Arab refugees who left Israel in 1948 is estimated to be around 630,000. The number of Jewish refugees from Arab lands is estimated to be the same. 12. Arab refugees were INTENTIONALLY not absorbed or integrated into the Arab lands to which they fled, despite the vast Arab territory. Out of the 100,000,000 refugees since World War II, theirs is the only refugee group in the world that has never been absorbed or integrated into their own peoples' lands. Jewish refugees were completely absorbed into Israel, a country no larger than the state of New Jersey. 13. The Arab - Israeli Conflict - The Arabs are represented by eight separate nations, not including the Palestinians. There is only one Jewish nation. The Arab nations initiated all five wars and lost. Israel defended itself each time and won. 14. The P.L.O.'s Charter still calls for the destruction of the State of Israel. Israel has given the Palestinians most of the West Bank land, autonomy under the Palestinian Authority, and has supplied them with weapons. 15. Under Jordanian rule, Jewish holy sites were desecrated and the Jews were denied access to places of worship. Under Israeli rule, all Muslim and Christian sites have been preserved and made accessible to people of all faiths. 16. The U.N. Record on Israel and the Arabs - Of the 175 Security Council resolutions passed before 1990, 97 were directed against Israel. 17. Of the 690 General Assembly resolutions voted on before 1990, 429 were directed against Israel. 18. The U.N was silent while 58 Jerusalem Synagogues were destroyed by the Jordanians. 19. The U.N. was silent while the Jordanians systematically desecrated the ancient Jewish cemetery on the Mount of Olives. 20. The U.N. was silent while the Jordanians enforced an apartheid-like policy of preventing Jews from visiting the Temple Mount and the Western Wall.

Would you care to expand? If I take auto insurance out, I am insuring my car , myself, and my family for damages to ourselves only. Should I be in an accident, I am insuring that my car gets fixed, some payments are made for damages that may occur to my clothes (but not contents), and for some property damage that I may be liable for. Should I not be at fault, then the damages comes from the at fault party. How am I insuring everyone else? You are paying twice if you buy collision. If you buy PL and PD which under the current system you have to have it will fix every one's car but not yours. Yet you foot the bill. If you want yours fixed, you have to pay again. It is bullshit. Now if you are hit by someone who doesn't have PL and PD you are out of luck again, even though you have PL and PD which will fix everyone else's vehicle but yours. This has to be changed to system where you pay once at the same rate you would currently have to pay for PL and PD now, subject to whatever savings their would be because of more people buying, but it covers you and your vehicle. Will people have to go out and buy insurance to cover themselves who currently don't have any. If they want to be insured they will. But that will be a good thing because more people will be buying which should bring the rates down. Will you have to buy insurance. No, and someone can run into me all they want, I'm still covered. Such a system would be more like house insurance. I hope that explains it.

Are we really back to this pathetic excuse for a response? This would be like Hitler who, having wiped the Jews off the map, says "There never was a people called the Jews.". Like I said, these people have no shame. Those are the facts of recorded history. Whether you like it or not.