B. Max

What failure. The original mission was to get rid of Saddam. That mission was accomplished. That there are people who want to kill one another is besides the point. The new mission is to kill terrorists and keep them from getting control. There is no reason to believe that that mission is not proceeding in way that will end in a successful conclusion. Just because it doesnt meet the arbitrary time table of those who have no plan other than to what extent they can go to in order to appease terrorists is of no importance.

If one were to follow that logic to its conclusion we would have everyone turn in their cars so they wouldn't be stolen. Oh, and we would have close down all the drug stores. Oh what the hell, just ban anything that might be stolen. Although even after that the problem would still exist because the crooks would still be there. It would be better to get rid of the thugs and crooks, but then that's not a politically correct feel good.

No this sums it up. WRONG WRONG and WRONG again.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/7/26/212449/970 That's world net daily. The question is why did they even mention it. The answer is, because they are trying to see how far they can push it. It's quite clear the left is using Tillmans death to attack Bush and the war. It seems it is Tillmans brother and congress who started the mess in the first place, nor is there any indication Pat Tillman was against the war. In fact he joined up to go and fight in it. It's typical of the lengths the left will go to, and no lie is to big to tell. http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/017435.php

Apparently the loons have already decided that not only is it Bushes fault, but he likely ordered it. WASHINGTON – The highly trafficked "progressive" website DailyKos, which boasts contributors including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, is suggesting football star Pat Tillman was murdered in Afghanistan on orders from the White House. http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56895

Where did all those, I love government people go.

I don't agree that they can be owned by anyone. The airways don't even exist unless they are generated and the CRTC doesn't generate any kind of signal. The people that own and have the equipment for generating signals would have more of a claim. Regardless, the government has no business telling them or anyone that they have to carry someone else's programming, and especially when it comes to religious programming that has nothing to do with this country.

But both are paranoid, deluded and dangerous enough to warrant that need. For all intents and purposes, when it comes to the safety of my family, I see no difference between a paranoid gun waving survivalist and a paranoid gun waving crack or smack head. Sounds like the kind of nonsense that would come out of Quebec. The great failed socialist experiment.

I've responed to everyone of them. Now answer my question.

I thought you wanted to shoot it up some junkie's arm.

Touche. It seems Tehran and Riyadh are the only places exempt from the poisonous grips of those damned Godless mongrels. The day you answer all of mine. I did, and then some.

Wait, are you going to answer the question. What was the purpose of the US bill of rights?

Al Gorbbels would likely have had the US in a state of civil war before the end of his first and what would certainly be his last term.

I thought that's what CPAC or what ever they call it was for.

name='marcinmoka' date='Jul 30 2007, 12:11 AM' post='240734'] I have answered the question. Oh, you don't like the answer, tough. Why would I condone the murders. What does it have to do with anything we're talking about. Government is trampling on peoples rights left and right in this country every day. What else is new. No it wasn't Gabriel, it was his boss so to speak. If you don't know what your rights are, then you don't have any. As I know, so do I know what my rights are. Some basic rights are easily demonstrated. If I raise my hand to strike you, you will raise yours in defense. The framers of the US constitution understood the concept of certain basic inaliable rights quite well, and they new that they had to be put in a place where government couldn't get at them. Not that government couldn't trample on them, but so they couldn't get at them in an attempt to change them. They also believed that not all rights came from God, as Jefferson in one of his letters talked about negative and positive rights. Yet believed that other rights flowed from the basic God given rights. What was the purpose of the US bill of rights? That's your unfounded opinion. I think I'm sufficiently trained in the matters of self preservation. There have been plenty of questionable shootings by cops, and just as many cases of people killed by stolen cars. But I will decide if I have to shoot. Actually I never hated it until the secular progressives got their hands on the levers of power.

The entire Canadian constitution is about giving more power to government. The good government thing, as they interpret it. Is just in case there's some power they didn't give themselves to put their boot on your neck.

Some times you just have to accept the fact that this is stupid country and leave it at that.

Oh we know that there are right thinking people in the east.

I wouldn't trust those polls. From what I hear about CBC ratings it would be hard to believe that all but a few would want the CBC and I suspect the majority of those are in the east.

I think most Canadians would like to see the CBC sold to private interests and the CRTC scrapped. That's how we begin to shrink the size of government.

Looks like there won't be to many going back to Marxassachusetts. http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2007/0...g-hard-way.html

I also would like to know just how you know exactly what Soros has been contributing to Move On. How much did he give them. Whether fox is fair and balanced is none of Move On's business. I think the whole idea of fair and balanced is stupid to begin with. Move On are after fox because they exposed Gore as a fraud and a phony, along with a host of other left wing craziness, even exposing Jessie Jackson as a shake down artist.

name='marcinmoka' date='Jul 29 2007, 04:38 PM' post='240671'] No you are away off topic. The question was ridiculous. It's like asking how do I know the sun came up. Wrong again. Rights have always existed, have they always been recognized, no. Civilized World, that's a subjective term, I supose to go along with subjective obligations. I'm glad you said legal structure and not justice system, because in our legal structure our justice system is a revolving door. His act deserves what ever it takes to stop the act. The police would do no different. Although, as we progress along in our so called Civilized Society of leftist lunacy. It's not hard to imagine feel good obligations placed on the property owner, placing the blame on the property owner for the acts of thug. Hell, I'm just about tempted to sing a couple of verses of imagine, the theme song for the Civilized world.

http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/Th...ngOfAmerica.htm Would that be free dominionists or the vast right wing conspiracy.

name='marcinmoka' date='Jul 29 2007, 03:32 PM' post='240663'] What does that have to with the right. He doesn't have the right to steal my car. Can you stick to the subject.