B. Max

'blueblood' date='Apr 17 2007, 12:28 AM' post='208817'] You can buy ammunition for guns that are over 100 years old still, they still make model 94 30-30 ammo. It's been demonstrated time and again that city people are typically not fit to own guns. Most city people go to outfitters when they go out to the country for hunting, for them it's like a vacation, for me it's a walk out the door and a stroll out in the ravine. Where is a city person going to encounter a coyote, or other varmint? They don't, it's just asking for bad news having them have guns. That's really a poor line of thinking. The majority of city people are not a danger, they are in danger. There is just as much reason, maybe more for someone in the city to own a gun for protection. Just as I would carry a gun in the bush for protection. Today was an excellent demonstration of no one having any protection. One has a right to defend themselves.

Nice try linking the two. There are people on this board who support racism. Lynching is an act of racism. Therefore posters on this board are a threat. Nice spin. But it is apples and oranges.

I expect that you are fairly tall now so you might just venture in there and freewheel around for a while, you are the only one that can determine what you would believe as evidence of what the IPCC presents. However just to get started why don't you check this one out. http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/meeting/URW/produ...W_Report_v2.pdf They must have used the word uncertainty a hundred times. Not surprising though. It's same old thing computer models and false data. The hockey stick graph looks like it is still in there, although it has been discredited over and over. Another gragh still shows todays temperature warmer than 1940 and no cooling period after that. Even though the only known reliable data of observed temperature clearly shows the twenties leading to the forties as being warmer that todays temperature. They have the same old assumption that co2 is a major temperature drive, yet the proxy records say otherwise. Climate can only be measured observed and proxy recorded over long periods of time after the fact, and that is the best way to try and predict future climate. Not computer models with wrong data put into them. You put in the wrong information and you will get the wrong answer. So no i'm not buying it.

I think its funny that you think this is a credible news source. Please, please find some other media outlet (ANY!!!) to quote and reference. Its so darn difficult to take anything from NewsMax seriously... seriously. This is a credible source. One of the best.

'Guthrie' date='Apr 16 2007, 02:17 PM' post='208530'] The usual nonsense from an alarmist. C02 is not pollution and destroying economies is what is all about. Just ask these people who do want to work and produce something of value that somebody actually wants but the I got mine jack crowd won't let them. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/worl...icle1655188.ece

Of course there is no truth to that. This is just more propaganda. Doing something as they put it would mean the destruction of our economy with the end result being war. Makes these complainers complaints trivial at best. These people have been sucking millions and millions of dollars extorted from the people they blame, for a lot longer than ten years. There is about twenty four thousand of these people in the entire area with half of them that work for the phony Nunavut government and the other half on welfare. I would say it's ground zero for a useless race of people.

If you found it then show us.

Yeah taxpayer pockets. The only ones suppressing real science are the government trough sucking so-called scientists. Who promote junk science and do the bidding of their masters at the cesspool of marxist corruption. http://www.torontosun.com/Comment/2007/04/...033755-sun.html

You forgot climate alarmists.

I looked but there is really nothing. A lot of assumptions and rhetoric and references to their bio diversity which includes agenda 21.

Bush has said they need to be permanent. If the dems raise taxes like this the economy will take a big hit. I think that people are starting to realize they made a big mistake and this will likely be their last trip to the trough for a while.

That's a very vauge statement. Either Iraq was a threat or it was not. If you agree it was not a threat, then you probably agree with the rest of my post above. Of course it was a threat. Iraq was a state sponsor of terrorism. 911 was an act of terrorism.

For your information at the top of the article it said the paper was controversial. However since Hug is not here to defend his paper the claim of being debunked can not be proven. As for the broken record a correction was noted and made and has no real bearing anyway.

This is total smear and nothing but an attack on the people who create the wealth and our standard of living. Who do they think they are. In total they take billions and billions from taxpayers and companies alike, and produce nothing of any real value. For them to talk about someone else's funding is in conflict at the very least and since they get government money is most likely political interference.

Except that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11... Iraq is one part of the war on terror.

Yeah he should have done nothing like Clinton did and then we'd have more 911's to talk about.

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Rhodes/1588/ http://dede.essortment.com/canadasvietnam_rgwv.htm

Well you seemed to admit the numbers were right until they some how changed. So I'll take that back. You were never right.

Ann Coulter certainly believed it: You are away in over your head. Canada didn't send the troops, they went and joined the American military. What Canada did was to supply billions of dollars worth of munitions to the US.

So you admit you were wrong, that's good. Now you are still wrong. Daly got them from reputable scientists and numbers don't change, 2+2 always makes four just as an example. I see you still can't resist using smear as a substitute for science.

Another reason the left should never have their hands on the levers of power. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2...2713.shtml?s=lh

name='guyser' date='Apr 15 2007, 03:59 PM' post='208133'] Americans kill people. Canadians kill people. In far off places...with government support. Deal with it.

Yeah right. http://www.john-daly.com/artifact.htm

I just proved you were wrong. You are the fake.

That sounds a lot like some of the climate alarmists who want to put scientists on Nuremberg type trials for not agreeing with them.