B. Max

Oh really. http://www.john-daly.com/artifact.htm

Yeah, especially when most of the people opposed to the science also seem to be funded by oil and gas. As well the UN, and pretty well every developed country with the exception of the United States and Australia, are all wrong on the matter. People you know who else is in the climate change denial crowd, guess... Its an organization which believes the earth is only 10,000 years old, well its Focus on the Family, and pretty well the whole Christian right. Like I said in another thread. The left thinks science is about smear. Well I guess for them it is when that's all you have. This was good title: Climate report shows 'highway to extinction': scientists Unfortunately there has been nothing to back up the report.

Yeah, especially when most of the people opposed to the science also seem to be funded by oil and gas. As well the UN, and pretty well every developed country with the exception of the United States and Australia, are all wrong on the matter. People you know who else is in the climate change denial crowd, guess... Its an organization which believes the earth is only 10,000 years old, well its Focus on the Family, and pretty well the whole Christian right. Like I said in another thread. The left thinks science is about smear. Well I guess for them it is when that's all you have.

He hasn't attacked anyone. He has put forword the numbers. That's what science is about, unfortunately you don't understand that. You and the Hansen crowd seem to think it's about smear and politics.

The election isn't tomorrow. The Republicans are still looking for Mr. right.

I don't have to defend him. He can defend himself. What have you proven wrong.

You have failed to prove anything wrong that he says, and much of what he says is the work of others which he credits for it. This is certainly true and he has not been the only one saying it, and it is because of the Hansen's of the world that it is true, and outfits like the corrupt IPCC. 1. Science is in a state of decay due to corruption. Science sets the standards of rationality for society. What happens to science will happen to all of society.

Actually the EPA are a bunch of liars and most of them got there under Clinton who was the liar king.

name='Canadian Blue' date='Apr 15 2007, 03:48 PM' post='208124'] Tom Tancredo, what is he at right now 1%... I don't know what he's at right now. But I know the others don't have the base and what chunk of the base they do have is eroding as of late and they have been flip flopping around trying to get it back. So this just proves he's a right wing ideologue. It proves he is a traditionalist, and not a leftwing progressive / cultural Maxrist.

Not true. I've been doing this for years and have looked at just about everything there is, and there is no evidence yet that CO2 causes any meaningful temperature rise. Only evidence that suggests it doesn't. http://www.nov55.com/crunch.html

Looks like you're out of ammo.

That is propaganda, composed of junk science, misleading information and outright lies.

If it's been proven for a long time now it shouldn't be hard for you to prove it.

Prove it.

We know the truth, and the truth is there is no evidence. To say there is, is like saying the sun comes up because the rooster crows.

I think by the time 08 comes around Tom Tancredo is going to look like the Republicans best chance to hold onto the white house, and the best hope to fix the problems of the country. Grass roots support looks strong but will the party hierarchy stab him in the back. http://www.saveamericafund.com/tom-tancredo-pres.php Voting Record Scorecard American Conservative Union A+ National Right to Life Committee A National Rifle Association A Family Research Council A National Taxpayers Union A Americans for Better Immigration A+ National Federation of Independent Business A+

Problem is, there is no evidence of man made global warming.

Cell phones have been around for years. Why now.

What US new world order.

So you've been seeing a lot of co2 have you.

He's a freaking Geologist for gawd's sake. Show me a consensus among Climatologists and you'll have something. Consensus is not science.

So do you think that crowd was disagreeing with him.

Oh, have you never heard the expression, they all look better at closing time.

it's on page 4 and its the presentation which they used to create this - http://www.energybulletin.net/22996.html - pile of crap Hanson and Gore are the one's who have been spreading misinformation. Neither one of them have ever produced anything of value but have sucked out of the public trough and now condemn those that keep the tough full. Hansen and his phony computer models are a prime example of why government needs to be down sized. http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.ph...ly-insensitive/

Might is not scientific fact, and to suggest that computer models are involved makes it laughable. So I guess that clinches it. Dust storms on earth cause global warming.