B. Max

If it's coming from the UN you know it's crap. The couldn't run a peanut stand never mind an economy.

Well if they had gone with the notion and propaganda that Saddam was bad and needed to be taken out and not lie about it, it might have never gone down. Gotta sex up everything for the masses. But because they lied about the 'true goal', I cannot put much faith in the war on terror. and overall Iraq will be a thorn in the US's side for decades to come. They never lied about anything. The Clinton administration had said the same thing, and congress looked at it said the same thing and voted for the war.

We're not? Why else would America be there if not to secure the oil supply. Yes, electric cars need to be at least as dependable as the vehicles we currently (pun unintended LOL) drive and at least as affordable. The US buys oil from different parts of the world and Canada is its biggest supplier. They also produce a lot of their own oil and could produce more.

We are not dependent on the ME. The electric car is no good. At 250 miles to the charge and 90'000 dollars what good is it.

Just our own quisling types. Who should be reminded that al Qaeda and the taliban don't take prisoners any longer than it takes to line them up and shoot them or chop necks.

Yeah this looks like it here. Just click below video. http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/beck.climateoffear/

Just watched Beck's show. Not bad but I think he could have done a better job. For instance when he exposed the CO2 lag verses temperature he never mentioned that it was an 800 year lag. I think that's important. He didn't spend enough time on some of the important details and then brought in the stupid sports car. Which is not practical anyway. Hopefully he woke up a few more people to the fact they are being duped by the Gore and Suzuki alarmists who are foot soldiers for the UN's agenda. I thought he did a pretty good job of exposing the state governors who are also complicit in trying to silence their state climatologists.

I guess that's means you don't dispute it.

That's the kind of nonsense that's comes from the likes of the world progress report.

Exactly.

....not was, is. There was no real connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda. But now for certain there is. Just not with Saddam.... Definately was in and is in Iraq. Even the clinton administration new it. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2...11/154020.shtml One such report was published by The Weekly Standard in its July 5-12 issue. Stephen F. Hayes, author of the new book "The Connection: How al-Qaeda's Collaboration with Saddam Hussein has Endangered America," says Clinton administration officials in the late 1990s and beyond were making regular references to Saddam, his WMD programs and association with al-Qaida.

Not true. Now why does Pelosi and Ried want to cut and run now. They know for sure that Al Qaeda is operating in Iraq while at the same time in the past claiming Bush isn't going after Al Qaeda. Why are they offering information to Al Qaeda in form of a time table for surrender to Al Qaeda . Concealed as a spending bill. Shadowy connections A captured Iraqi intelligence officer of 20 years' standing, Abu Iman al-Baghdadi, who is held by the PUK, said Abu Wa'il is actively manipulating the Ansar on behalf of Iraqi intelligence. Abu Iman al-Baghdadi: "Some of Ansar trained in Iraq" "I was captured by the Kurds after Iraqi intelligence sent me to check what was happening with Abu Wa'il, following rumours that he'd been captured and handed over the CIA," al-Baghdadi said. He added that Baghdad smuggles arms to the Ansar through the Kurdish area, and is using the group to make problems for the PUK, one of the opposition factions ranged against Saddam Hussein.

Why wait for 2008. Do it tomorow.

Fermentation releases CO2. Maybe they should all be shut down.

name='Guthrie' date='May 2 2007, 04:13 PM' post='214829'] It's what it was meant to be. More evidence of Al Qaeda operating in Iraq before the war. They didn't. They are still fighting Al Qaeda . Given time they will. The saudli's have been taking care of them. I have have made it. Pelosi and Ried are traitors. Buckley doesn't know what he's talking about. Al Qaeda was in Iraq.

Oh wow, all that power.

There is plenty of evidence. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2149499.stm

I know exactly who he is, and he is not informed. If he is, then he is closet liberal in the same camp as Pelosi.

I've seen this advertised for a couple of days now in several places. Rutherford mentioned it this morning on his show. The more the UN and Gore are exposed for the frauds they are the better.

Buckley is poorly informed and it seems, has jumped on Pelosi's and Ried's time table for surrender which they want to hand over to al Qaeda, which is clearly a treasonous act. Lets assume that al Qaeda was not in Iraq, something we know is not true. Everyone knows they are there now. So why are the Dems now wanting to cut and run. We can only assume that if the al Qaeda flag had been flying over Iraq at the time they still would have been against going after them.

GWB deniers remind me of that comcast phone commercial --- a guy stands there in his boxers and his tiger stripe tattoos -- "I told you before, tattoos are permanent" "but that was before on my old service" "sorry, Roger, you tiger now" "sorry? ... but I have Comcast Digital Voice" Well that proves the computer models don't work. It does not prove man global warming. We do know that it's nothing unusual. http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.ph...vived/#more-216

You mean the liberal MSM who have been undermining Bush and the war.

Only trouble is, Gee whiz..... It's hard to tell who wants us to be poor the ones who can't see the heat waves going past their own noses or the ones who can. No it's not hard to tell at all. It's the sickle swingers.

Sounds like a good place to send all those who preach the Gandhi nonsense of wanting to be poor. Yeah, I say hit em hard round em up and head em outa here.

All that proves is that the compertors models don't work. Which has been claimed all along. http://www.zenit.org/english/visualizza.phtml?sid=106708