B. Max

Well I consider communist's to be well to left, and Jones's little commune was left. As for no track record, lets let the numbers speak for themselves. http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.ART.HTM In sum the communist probably have murdered something like 110,000,000, or near two-thirds of all those killed by all governments, quasi-governments, and guerrillas from 1900 to 1987. Of course, the world total itself it shocking. It is several times the 38,000,000 battle-dead that have been killed in all this century's international and domestic wars. Yet the probable number of murders by the Soviet Union alone--one communist country-- well surpasses this cost of war. And those murders of communist China almost equal it. Now back to the question. How does one get rid of all the people our leftist ehco friends would like to get rid of.

Yup they are, along with the green cool-aid.

Well what would you call getting rid of a few billion people. The left has track record of around a 100 million in the last century of mostly death by government.

Well lets assume it's the for now since there is evidence to point the finger in that direction. So move on to the question.

It would seem that the left are plotting their biggest genocide to date. Exactly how does one go about getting rid of around five billion people. Forced sterilization, and who, forced abortion, and who, and what do you do with the people who are already here. Cut off the means to sustain themselves, and again who so that the chosen few survive. http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2...0506180903.aspx http://newsbyus.com/more.php?id=8130_0_1_0_M

No we don't "know" that. Yes we do know that for sure. http://republicans.oversight.house.gov/new...e.aspx?NewsID=4 Nor did the 911 commission ever see the captured Iraqi documents. In the end the 911 commission turned out to be a waste of time. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,165414,00.html The 9/11 commission took a very high-profile role in critiquing intelligence agencies that refused to listen to outside information. The commissioners very publicly expressed their disapproval of agencies and departments that would not entertain ideas that did not originate in-house," Weldon wrote in his letter Wednesday night. "Therefore it is no small irony," Weldon pointed out, "that the commission would in the end prove to be guilty of the very same offense when information of potentially critical importance was brought to its attention."

name='GostHacked' date='May 6 2007, 10:13 PM' post='216558'] No I didn't, but keep an eye on O'Reilly, they are advertising that he is about to expose a conspiracy to smear right thinking people. Yeah yellow cake that they had until about a year and half ago until the US flew it out F Iraq and back to the US. Plugged it whenever they could. Now they know it is a lie. So someone in the Bush admin outed Valerie Plame, because Wilson said that there was no claims about yellow cake from Niger. It was not a lie and the British still stand by their claim that Iraq had tried to buy more yellow cake but were unsuccessful. Wilson outed her when he wrote the letter that was published in the new york times. Not only that, they had been running around the Washington party circuit bragging that she worked for the CIA. On top of all that there were never any charges laid, nor did she fit any criteria that would make it illegal if someone did out her.

Link Link Wrong and wrong. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/6/29/232820.shtml Plainly miffed that Dr. Allawi hadn't accepted the U.S. media's attempt to cover-up links between Saddam, al Qaida and 9/11, Brokaw reprimanded him as cameras rolled: "Prime minister, I’m surprised that you would make the connection between 9/11 and the war in Iraq. The 9/11 commission in America says there is no evidence of a collaborative relationship between Saddam Hussein and those terrorists of al-Qaida." But Dr. Allawi refused to back down, telling the top TV anchor: "No. I believe very strongly that Saddam had relations with al-Qaida. And these relations started in Sudan. We know Saddam had relationships with a lot of terrorists and international terrorism. Now, whether he is directly connected to the September atrocities or not, I can’t vouch for this. But definitely I know he has connections with extremism and terrorists." http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2003/9/17/232349.shtml Here's what the New York Times said about the camp six weeks after 9/11: "New information does suggest that Mr. Hussein was actively training terrorists to attack American interests throughout the 1990's. "One example is the testimony of Sabah Khodada, a captain in the Iraqi army who emigrated to Texas in May after working for eight years at what he described as a terrorist training camp at a bend in the Tigris River just southeast of Baghdad."

Yawn! http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=28146

It backs up the claims that Iraq had yellow cake, and now puts you behind the wheel of another typical left wing drive by smear.

name='Guthrie' date='May 6 2007, 07:33 PM' post='216481'] Sounded a little strange until you find out the truth, and as usual leftwing nut bars are behind it using their smear tactics. http://www.lyingliar.com/lies/oreilly/peabodypolk.htm You and Franken must have went to the same left wing smear tactic school.

I don't even know what a Gaulist is, or the rest of it for that matter.

The MSM are in the business of cover up when it comes to the Islamic butchers and their plans. However they have no problem undermining the war effort against them. http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid...icle%2FShowFull

Wasn't Chirac a socialist.

Time shows its true colors. Who would want to be in it with a filthy piece of work like O'Donnell. It would be like getting the order of Canada for gear boxes and idiots.

prove it http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/11/2/220331.shtml

name='Guthrie' date='May 5 2007, 04:46 PM' post='216128'] For every time in 1997 that a civilian used a handgun to kill in self-defense, 43 people lost their lives in handgun homicides alone. That last fact is from FBI Supplementary Homicide Report data, 1997. firearms do not make us safer, firearms make us less safe Want else would one expect from a gun grabber site. Florida: concealed carry helps slash the murder rate in the state. In the fifteen years following the passage of Florida's concealed carry law in 1987, over 800,000 permits to carry firearms were issued to people in the state.32 FBI reports show that the homicide rate in Florida, which in 1987 was much higher than the national average, fell 52% during that 15-year period—thus putting the Florida rate below the national average.33 CDC admits there is no evidence that gun control reduces crime. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has long been criticized for propagating questionable studies which gun control organizations have used in defense of their cause. But after analyzing 51 studies in 2003, the CDC concluded that the "evidence was insufficient to determine the effectiveness of any of these [firearms] laws."9 http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/bates050307.htm http://www.gunowners.org/fs0404.htm

Tenet has a bad memory and subsitutes that with imagination. Wilson had nothing and as it turned out was wrong. Iraq did try to buy yellow cake but were turned down, and already hand 500 tons. It takes quite a case of cognitive dissonance to believe all of those lies -- Wilson had the facts, Tenet had the facts, Iraq did not try to buy yellow cake and no, they had no nuclear weapons program Wrong.

Tenet has a bad memory and subsitutes that with imagination. Wilson had nothing and as it turned out was wrong. Iraq did try to buy yellow cake but were turned down, and already hand 500 tons.

name='M.Dancer' date='May 3 2007, 10:14 AM' post='215093'] Never been debunked. However we know the 911 commision never heard everything.

No different than Pelosi and Reid in the US who have announced and want the president to sign a time table for surrender. Absolutely treasonous. They are all birds of a feather.

What evidence.

name='August1991' date='May 5 2007, 03:30 AM' post='215860'] name='B. Max' post='215857' date='May 5 2007, 02:05 AM'] So what. That has nothing to do with the second amendment or the first or any of the first ten. It depends on the constitution, and understanding it. If not they could very well suffer tyranny. Simply not true. Even the FBI estimates that guns are used, not necessarily fired, as many as 700'000 times a year in self defence. Others have put it higher. I would agree, and that would include those who attack the second amendment with dubious arguments. The framers considered the first ten amendments inherent and inalienable, and those who would attack one would given time, attack all of them.

Actually, no. Congress wasn't supplied the same intelligence as the administration. They had to go on the administration's word that the intelligence was sound, and the administration lied. http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/bliraqreshouse.htm What evidence did they have that congress didn't have that they lied about? How did the Bush administration lie in 1998? Whereas Iraq, in direct and flagrant violation of the cease-fire, attempted to thwart the efforts of weapons inspectors to identify and destroy Iraq's weapons of mass destruction stockpiles and development capabilities, which finally resulted in the withdrawal of inspectors from Iraq on October 31, 1998;

Hogwash. Maybe that's how they do it in socialist police state. In which case calling 911 is a waste of time, just call the morgue. The first ten amendments are listed in order of importance and are declaratory and restrictive as stated in the preamble. They restrict government power, and are rights the government can not change.