G Huxley

This whole pity Christian morality play is playing a key role in the environmental destruction in the world.

This whole thing is totally ridiculous, it doesn't even looked like he saw the person he bumped into as he was facing the other direction. Talk about over politicizing for real.

"Ever notice how Catholics from one part of the world are vastly different from Catholics in other parts? It probably has less to do with the religion and more to do with culture and politics." We can see where Catholicism has been there has been a period of massive population expansion. That makes it very problematic.

Africa is where Catholicism is growing the most. It has pretty much doubled its population in the last 20 years. Religion is the scourge of the earth.

Exactly its all USAID and Canada wheat. They thrive on it. No doubt they also take a significant cut. Jordan by the way where the population is about 65% refugees since 1948 has increased its population 2000% in the last century.

Where is Saudi Arabia? Where is Iran? The two countries who are driving this conflict more than any other.

Again its all about money. When the real issue at hand is the environment.

When it comes to immigration the Saudis have more sense than Canada.

hehehe

Well I'm thinking a very low number for Saudi Arabia, so we better not sell them those weapons Ottawa was planning to. This country is seriously sick.

How many by Saudi Arabia?

No kidding. Why doesn't the Middle East take them in? Oh I know, because the Middle East wants to dump them on the west and have Islam overrun it. The refugees are in fact a weapon of war against the West and they are being used as such. It plays right in to the west's incipidness and Christian sense of morality. Christian morality destroyed the Roman Empire and it is destroying the west.

It multiplies indeed. They never stop multiplying. That is the problem.

And destroy the local environment in the process.

Political correctness has become Orwellian Newspeak. e.g. how the word xenophobe is bastardized and abused and warped to mean something completely different from the original meaning. If you are opposed to being colonized (immigration) now you are labeled a xenophobe. However such people have no concept of what the word xenophobe literally means. A Xenos was the Greek word for a guest. In Ancient Greece if a person arrived as a guest one should offer them hospitality. It is still like this in some places and was like this in some places traditionally in Europe e.g. France. If a person typically avoided providing hospitality to guests they were considered a xenophobe. Now the term has been perverted to meaning 'opposition to colonization of your country.' This is the complete opposite of what the Greeks considered xenophobia. If a person overstayed their welcome they were no longer Xenos, and if they refused to leave they were a colonist. The Ancient Greeks fought tooth and nail against colonists.

"Canada comes first, not the rest of the world." Wow have you informed Ottawa of this? They think they are the world's immigration service for votes.

Exactly. Also the west provides insane amounts of free grain to such countries and causes their population to boom even more. It's like giving a crack addict unlimited free crack.

Dogonporch: Agreed with the latter part 100%. Of course that's why Neoliberal politicians love migrants, because they can be counted on for votes and they are unlikely to resist rather than the original population that has a stake in their country and a national identity. Disagree with the first part. The world is overpopulated and humans are rampantly destroying the environment. We need to stop human migration at least in order to prevent in further geometric increase in damage.

Regardless. My problem is with humans in general. We should not be letting anyone in.

Again, what was wrong with not letting the Jews in? I already quoted from their holy text what would be completely inadmissible on an immigration form. Harper spent the last few years representing Israel. Re: Trump I disagree with him on most issues. He is actually much closer to the Israelis in sentiment e.g. building a massive wall to divide them from their neighbours.

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/james-di-fiore/justin-trudeau-marijuana-hypocrisy_b_9944286.html?ir=Canada+Politics

"We don't discriminate by religion in immigration." However we should discriminate against religion.

"No specifics for this thread," The topic is migration. We've been on topic the entire time. "But how about we shut down immigration completely then?" That would be the most sensible thing to do. "Hell, stop having babies because of it all. Lead the way my friend. Set the example for us." I don't have any children. However I consider a sustainable number of children to be a far more effective method of population control than to have no children. The reason? If the population was decreasing, then the Neoliberals in Ottawa would be begging for more immigrants to come, who often don't have a tradition of sustainable family sizes. Also you need at least some population to defend the borders.

Not really temporary when all they had to do is be here long enough to gain citizenship.

Well said.